01.05.2013 Views

Annual Report - COMPLETE - Australian Crime Commission

Annual Report - COMPLETE - Australian Crime Commission

Annual Report - COMPLETE - Australian Crime Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4.13: Output 1.3 – MIDAS arrests and charges<br />

Measure Total<br />

Arrests 9<br />

Charges 18<br />

Figure 4.7: MIDAS arrests and charges by month<br />

Number<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Jul<br />

Arrests<br />

Aug<br />

Most MIDAS operations were conducted in collaboration with partner law enforcement<br />

agencies.<br />

Additional outputs included the improvement of <strong>Australian</strong> law enforcement understanding<br />

of money laundering and tax fraud schemes. The ACC has conducted case studies<br />

of new methodologies to raise awareness of new money laundering and tax fraud<br />

techniques. These case studies have been disseminated to the ATO, AFP, and Anti-<br />

Money Laundering Council in the Philippines and are available to all law enforcement<br />

agencies through ALEIN.<br />

Other Information<br />

Major court outcomes<br />

Sep<br />

Oct<br />

Charges<br />

Nov<br />

Dec<br />

A person summonsed to give evidence in relation to his knowledge of drug<br />

trafficking and money laundering activities of the principal of a syndicate under<br />

investigation in (ACC Operation Soho) was examined in January 2004 and was<br />

subsequently sentenced to one year imprisonment for failing to answer questions<br />

at the examination.<br />

This is the first sentence for such an offence under the ACC legislation and is an<br />

important result for the ACC. It confirms that the courts are willing to be firm with<br />

people who attempt to defy the ACC coercive powers in the expectation that they<br />

will only be given a fine. Courts have been unwilling to apply penal penalties in the<br />

past for the refusal to answer questions at coercive examinations.<br />

Jan<br />

Month<br />

Feb<br />

Mar<br />

Apr<br />

May<br />

Jun<br />

ACC ANNUAL REPORT 2003–04 I 71<br />

4<br />

OUTPUT 1.3: INVESTIGATIONS INTO FEDERALLY RELEVANT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!