09.05.2013 Views

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10<br />

THE XlTH DYNASTY TEMPLE AT DEIR EL-BAHARI.<br />

placed on the liitlicr side of the luuiiutiiin, ou<br />

the borders of the cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in the valley<br />

its<strong>el</strong>f, and mer<strong>el</strong>y pointing vagu<strong>el</strong>y iu the<br />

general direction of the tombs to which tliey<br />

b<strong>el</strong>onsed. <strong>The</strong> two first kino-s of the XYIIIth<br />

Dynasty had been buried in the Dra' Abu<br />

'l-Nefjga, on the hither side of the moun-<br />

tain, with their toml)-cliap<strong>el</strong>s adjoining their<br />

tombs. <strong>The</strong> kings of the Xllth Dynasty would<br />

have been buried in the same way, had they<br />

been interred <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong>bes. <strong>The</strong>y, however, pre-<br />

ferred the neighbourhood of their favourite<br />

'' Lake-Province " of the Favyum. Some of the<br />

kings of the Xlth Dynasty were probably buried<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong>, and we cannot doubt th<strong>at</strong><br />

their tombs were close to their funerary chap<strong>el</strong>s.<br />

For this reason the tomb of Xeb-hepet-Ra I.<br />

is probably near his <strong>temple</strong>, while the Bab<br />

ti-HoKiln may have been (if not the actual<br />

tomb) the ^vf -sanctuary of his successor, who<br />

added the shrines to the plan of the original<br />

builder, and so to some extent shares with him<br />

the ownership of the <strong>temple</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> tomb of Neb-hepet-Ka I. is said<br />

to have been intact <strong>at</strong> the time of the<br />

royal inquest into the tomb-robberies <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong>bes in the reign of Rameses TX., of<br />

the XXth Dynasty. //^"^kf /\ ~vwva<br />

'=' w<br />

\=^<br />

r\/^<br />

l]fiP¥C \ ^ D<br />

' <strong>The</strong><br />

Pyramid -Tomb of King Neb-hepet-Ra (life,<br />

wealth, health!). Son of the Sun, Mentuhetep<br />

(life, wealth, health!), which is in Tjesret<br />

(Zesret) ; it Avas intact." Ze)ier-zesrn-Ayion<br />

(" Holy of Holies of Amon ") is the ancient<br />

name of the Gre<strong>at</strong> Temple of Queen H<strong>at</strong>shepsu<br />

<strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong> ; and the shortened form<br />

Zesret was from the time of H<strong>at</strong>shepsu onwards<br />

used for <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong> generally. <strong>The</strong> tonib<br />

then was <strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong>, as Ave have assumed<br />

from wh<strong>at</strong> we know of the custom of the period<br />

l)efore the XMlIth Dynasty.<br />

<strong>The</strong> name of the tomb is given us by the st<strong>el</strong>a<br />

of a certain Tetu, priest of its chap<strong>el</strong>, who Avas<br />

buried <strong>at</strong> Abydos.' <strong>The</strong> name Avas(o<br />

'^» jj i /\<br />

, Al-li-dsnt-Nfb-hepet-Iid, "Glorious<br />

are the Se<strong>at</strong>s of King Xeb-hepet-Rn," deter-<br />

mined by a pyramid. <strong>The</strong> chap<strong>el</strong>, Avhich is the<br />

<strong>temple</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>ed by us, Avas known by the<br />

same name in its shortened form, Ahli-dsiit, or<br />

Akli-dset simply. In inscriptions found on the<br />

spot during these excav<strong>at</strong>ions the name occurs<br />

determined by the sign of a building, [ir^i,<br />

Avhich is used specifically ibr a <strong>temple</strong>, only ;<br />

thus a certain Aakhej)erka " Avas priest of the<br />

house (i.e. <strong>temple</strong>) Akh-asct " under the XVIlIth<br />

Dynasty. But in the inscriptions of the<br />

XVIIIth Dynasty <strong>temple</strong> of H<strong>at</strong>shepsu the<br />

name AlcJi-dsei seems to signify not a single<br />

building but the place <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong> gene-<br />

rally. On a small st<strong>el</strong>a of the XA'HIth<br />

Dynasty found by us Ave find Alrh-dset<br />

synonymous Avith Zesret : H<strong>at</strong>hor is called " lady<br />

of Zesret, she Avho is in Akh-aset," .<br />

'^^^ '^^ 1<br />

11<br />

^ r (^^- ^^^'- 6)- On another st<strong>el</strong>a<br />

(PI. xxvi. b) of the same d<strong>at</strong>e is mentioned a<br />

"priest of Amen in Akh-aset in the House of<br />

Xeb-hepet-Rfi," / J AAAAAA 1 -vtWAA ¥J^<br />

m^37n. Tiiis (unless it is an example of<br />

apposition, Akh-dset being synonymous Avith<br />

"the House of Xeb-hepet-Ra ") makes the <strong>temple</strong><br />

Avithin Akh-aset, not j;ikh-aset its<strong>el</strong>f. But th<strong>at</strong><br />

the Avoi'd Alih-dsut (Avritten l<strong>at</strong>er Akk-dset)<br />

originally design<strong>at</strong>ed not a place but a building<br />

Avould seem to be shown by its determin<strong>at</strong>ives<br />

and A : it is on the st<strong>el</strong>ae not determined<br />

by [y^, though it is sometimes determined by ®<br />

alone. We should ordinarily suppose th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

original Akh-dsnt Avas then a Ijuildino; <strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong><br />

<strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong>, the name of Avliich was afterwards,<br />

Avhen the st<strong>el</strong>ae mentioned above Avere inscribed,<br />

' Makiette, Cut. Ahijdu>i, No. 605.<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!