The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...
The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...
The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
10<br />
THE XlTH DYNASTY TEMPLE AT DEIR EL-BAHARI.<br />
placed on the liitlicr side of the luuiiutiiin, ou<br />
the borders of the cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion in the valley<br />
its<strong>el</strong>f, and mer<strong>el</strong>y pointing vagu<strong>el</strong>y iu the<br />
general direction of the tombs to which tliey<br />
b<strong>el</strong>onsed. <strong>The</strong> two first kino-s of the XYIIIth<br />
Dynasty had been buried in the Dra' Abu<br />
'l-Nefjga, on the hither side of the moun-<br />
tain, with their toml)-cliap<strong>el</strong>s adjoining their<br />
tombs. <strong>The</strong> kings of the Xllth Dynasty would<br />
have been buried in the same way, had they<br />
been interred <strong>at</strong> <strong>The</strong>bes. <strong>The</strong>y, however, pre-<br />
ferred the neighbourhood of their favourite<br />
'' Lake-Province " of the Favyum. Some of the<br />
kings of the Xlth Dynasty were probably buried<br />
<strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong>, and we cannot doubt th<strong>at</strong><br />
their tombs were close to their funerary chap<strong>el</strong>s.<br />
For this reason the tomb of Xeb-hepet-Ra I.<br />
is probably near his <strong>temple</strong>, while the Bab<br />
ti-HoKiln may have been (if not the actual<br />
tomb) the ^vf -sanctuary of his successor, who<br />
added the shrines to the plan of the original<br />
builder, and so to some extent shares with him<br />
the ownership of the <strong>temple</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong> tomb of Neb-hepet-Ka I. is said<br />
to have been intact <strong>at</strong> the time of the<br />
royal inquest into the tomb-robberies <strong>at</strong><br />
<strong>The</strong>bes in the reign of Rameses TX., of<br />
the XXth Dynasty. //^"^kf /\ ~vwva<br />
'=' w<br />
\=^<br />
r\/^<br />
l]fiP¥C \ ^ D<br />
' <strong>The</strong><br />
Pyramid -Tomb of King Neb-hepet-Ra (life,<br />
wealth, health!). Son of the Sun, Mentuhetep<br />
(life, wealth, health!), which is in Tjesret<br />
(Zesret) ; it Avas intact." Ze)ier-zesrn-Ayion<br />
(" Holy of Holies of Amon ") is the ancient<br />
name of the Gre<strong>at</strong> Temple of Queen H<strong>at</strong>shepsu<br />
<strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong> ; and the shortened form<br />
Zesret was from the time of H<strong>at</strong>shepsu onwards<br />
used for <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong> generally. <strong>The</strong> tonib<br />
then was <strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong>, as Ave have assumed<br />
from wh<strong>at</strong> we know of the custom of the period<br />
l)efore the XMlIth Dynasty.<br />
<strong>The</strong> name of the tomb is given us by the st<strong>el</strong>a<br />
of a certain Tetu, priest of its chap<strong>el</strong>, who Avas<br />
buried <strong>at</strong> Abydos.' <strong>The</strong> name Avas(o<br />
'^» jj i /\<br />
, Al-li-dsnt-Nfb-hepet-Iid, "Glorious<br />
are the Se<strong>at</strong>s of King Xeb-hepet-Rn," deter-<br />
mined by a pyramid. <strong>The</strong> chap<strong>el</strong>, Avhich is the<br />
<strong>temple</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>ed by us, Avas known by the<br />
same name in its shortened form, Ahli-dsiit, or<br />
Akli-dset simply. In inscriptions found on the<br />
spot during these excav<strong>at</strong>ions the name occurs<br />
determined by the sign of a building, [ir^i,<br />
Avhich is used specifically ibr a <strong>temple</strong>, only ;<br />
thus a certain Aakhej)erka " Avas priest of the<br />
house (i.e. <strong>temple</strong>) Akh-asct " under the XVIlIth<br />
Dynasty. But in the inscriptions of the<br />
XVIIIth Dynasty <strong>temple</strong> of H<strong>at</strong>shepsu the<br />
name AlcJi-dsei seems to signify not a single<br />
building but the place <strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong> gene-<br />
rally. On a small st<strong>el</strong>a of the XA'HIth<br />
Dynasty found by us Ave find Alrh-dset<br />
synonymous Avith Zesret : H<strong>at</strong>hor is called " lady<br />
of Zesret, she Avho is in Akh-aset," .<br />
'^^^ '^^ 1<br />
11<br />
^ r (^^- ^^^'- 6)- On another st<strong>el</strong>a<br />
(PI. xxvi. b) of the same d<strong>at</strong>e is mentioned a<br />
"priest of Amen in Akh-aset in the House of<br />
Xeb-hepet-Rfi," / J AAAAAA 1 -vtWAA ¥J^<br />
m^37n. Tiiis (unless it is an example of<br />
apposition, Akh-dset being synonymous Avith<br />
"the House of Xeb-hepet-Ra ") makes the <strong>temple</strong><br />
Avithin Akh-aset, not j;ikh-aset its<strong>el</strong>f. But th<strong>at</strong><br />
the Avoi'd Alih-dsut (Avritten l<strong>at</strong>er Akk-dset)<br />
originally design<strong>at</strong>ed not a place but a building<br />
Avould seem to be shown by its determin<strong>at</strong>ives<br />
and A : it is on the st<strong>el</strong>ae not determined<br />
by [y^, though it is sometimes determined by ®<br />
alone. We should ordinarily suppose th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
original Akh-dsnt Avas then a Ijuildino; <strong>at</strong> <strong>Deir</strong><br />
<strong>el</strong>-<strong>Bahari</strong>, the name of Avliich was afterwards,<br />
Avhen the st<strong>el</strong>ae mentioned above Avere inscribed,<br />
' Makiette, Cut. Ahijdu>i, No. 605.<br />
.