09.05.2013 Views

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38 TFIB XlTii DYNASTY TEMPLE AT DKIR EL-BAHARI.<br />

presented to the Museum by the Egyi^t Ex-<br />

plor<strong>at</strong>ion Fund.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first work undertaken in the third season<br />

(November, 1905) was the completion of the<br />

excav<strong>at</strong>ion of the Southern Court. <strong>The</strong> cross-<br />

wall was folloAved south until it was found to<br />

join a similar wall running eastwards, just as<br />

the fragment of the northern wall discovered in<br />

the work of ten years ago joins a similar Avail<br />

running eastwards, which was then n<strong>at</strong>urally<br />

considered to be the southernmost boundary-<br />

wall of H<strong>at</strong>shejisu's <strong>temple</strong>. <strong>The</strong> discovery of<br />

the parall<strong>el</strong> southern wall shows, however, th<strong>at</strong><br />

both these walls, and the cross-walls, were in<br />

reality of Xlth Dynasty work ; the long walls<br />

running east and west being, as has been said<br />

above (p. 20), the' temenos-Avalls of Mentuhe-<br />

tep's <strong>temple</strong>. <strong>The</strong> southern wall was followed for<br />

a considerable distance eastward. It had been<br />

covered in ancient times by tnfi rubbish, which<br />

looks as if it had been carried from an excava-<br />

tion in the tafl rock and tipped in the regular<br />

Egyptian way along the line of the temenos-wall.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only excav<strong>at</strong>ion in the tafl answering the<br />

requirements of the case is th<strong>at</strong> of the gre<strong>at</strong> ha-<br />

tomb or subterranean sanctuary in the Western<br />

Court, and it may w<strong>el</strong>l be th<strong>at</strong> the rubbish from<br />

this was tipped along the temenos-wall not so<br />

very long after the l<strong>at</strong>ter was built. <strong>The</strong><br />

Egyptians very often did things iu this car<strong>el</strong>ess<br />

fashion. Behind tlie temenos-wall (to the<br />

south of it) is a heavy brick wall. This was<br />

continued eastward into the plain by a low<br />

boundary-wall of brick, the course of which had<br />

been traced during the previous season. This<br />

turns to the north <strong>at</strong> right angles, thus enclosing<br />

the whole <strong>temple</strong> in a large rectangular temenos.<br />

<strong>The</strong> northern side of this was apparently de-<br />

stroyed by H<strong>at</strong>shepsu's work. <strong>The</strong> excav<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

of the southern line of it may be seen in the<br />

bird's-eye view (PI. vi., fig. 3). Connected with<br />

it were some found<strong>at</strong>ion-blocks of the blue-grey<br />

sandstone used in the <strong>temple</strong>, which were dis-<br />

covered in a line with tlie new house built in<br />

1905 for the expedition, about a hundred yards<br />

east of the camp. <strong>The</strong>se found<strong>at</strong>ions were only<br />

about 12 feet long, and then ceased abruptly,<br />

no further traces of building here being found.<br />

Kt the angle of the southern cross-Avall and<br />

the stone temenos-wall were uncovered some<br />

chambers of brick, compactly built, and covered<br />

with stucco (PI. viii., figs. 3, 4). <strong>The</strong> walls of<br />

these chambers are more or less intact up to the<br />

height of G or 7 feet, and are 2 to 3 feet thick.<br />

Remains of three chambers exist. <strong>The</strong> d<strong>at</strong>e of this<br />

building seems to be between the Xllth Dynasty<br />

and the beginning of the XVIIIth Dynasty. It<br />

is evident th<strong>at</strong> both of the Xlth Dynasty Avails<br />

Avere broken doAvn before its erection, as it is<br />

placed upon the ruins of their junction (see photo-<br />

graph in the Archaeological Report for 1905-6,<br />

PI. i., fig. 5). But fragments of joottery found<br />

in the bricks certainh' d<strong>at</strong>e to about the Xllth-<br />

XVIIIth Dynasty period. <strong>The</strong> bricks are<br />

large and Av<strong>el</strong>l-formed,^ resembling those of the<br />

XVIIIth Dynasty girdle-Avall of tlie <strong>temple</strong> of<br />

<strong>Deir</strong> <strong>el</strong>-Medina. <strong>The</strong> j)laster with Avhich they<br />

Avere covered is firm, Av<strong>el</strong>l-made, and hard. Close<br />

by, between the houses and Tomb No. 13, is a<br />

small Avail, only one brickthick and Avavy on plan,<br />

in order to give so thin a Avail the requisite sta-<br />

bility (see p. 51). This peculiar mode of Avall-<br />

building is <strong>el</strong>seAvhere found associ<strong>at</strong>ed Avith<br />

buildings of the Xllth Dynasty.^ One thing<br />

is certain : these buildings are not l<strong>at</strong>er than the<br />

Ramesside j)eriod. Th<strong>at</strong> they could be Coptic is<br />

utterly impossible, as all the objects found near<br />

them are either Xlth Dynasty or Ramesside, and<br />

their bricks are not of Coptic form. In Coptic<br />

days, also, these buildings Avere buried deep in the<br />

debris of the <strong>temple</strong>. <strong>The</strong>ir purpose is doubtful.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y cannot Av<strong>el</strong>l be buildings connected with the<br />

solitary tomb (No. 13) th<strong>at</strong> Avas found in this<br />

court, as they must have been erected after the<br />

' Measuring 13x5^x45 in., while the Xlth Dynasty<br />

bricks average 12 x 7 x 3 in.<br />

" Abijdoa, iii., }3l. xlii.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!