09.05.2013 Views

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

The XIth dynasty temple at Deir el-Bahari .. - NYU | Digital Library ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

60 THE XlTU DYNASTY TEMPLE AT DEIR EL-BAHARI.<br />

found made of" brick, but he established the<br />

worship of Usertsen III., and fixed the offerings<br />

which had to be made to him. Usertsen is<br />

seen there associ<strong>at</strong>ed with Dedun, the god of<br />

Nubia, exactly as Mentuhetep is associ<strong>at</strong>ed with<br />

Amon.<br />

We have no inform<strong>at</strong>ion about the worship<br />

of i\eb-hepet-Ra under the kings of the XLth<br />

Dynasty, his immedi<strong>at</strong>e followers ; but no doubt<br />

Usertsen pursued a tradition which had been<br />

established before him, soon after Neb-hepet-<br />

Ra's de<strong>at</strong>h.<br />

Another monument of the Xllth Dynasty<br />

mentions the worship of Mentuhetep II. It<br />

is a st<strong>el</strong>e found by Marietta <strong>at</strong> Abydos,<br />

and made for a man called y^ V^. He is<br />

said t^e|/IiJ||^(^^]^J|^<br />

^7 = 15' '"^'^^ t'hief herald in the Akh-<br />

Asu (the <strong>temple</strong> with its pyramid) of Neb-hepet-<br />

Ra, and the prophet of v^ Y "<br />

, Hor-sam-<br />

taui," who must not be considered as the<br />

god of this name, but as the king hims<strong>el</strong>f<br />

deified, whose ka name is the same as th<strong>at</strong> of<br />

the god.<br />

One of the Sebekhoteps of the Xlllth Dynasty<br />

renewed wh<strong>at</strong> Usertsen II. and III. had done.<br />

We know this from the inscription discovered<br />

by M. Legrain. But it is chiefly the <strong>The</strong>ban<br />

princes of the gre<strong>at</strong> Dynasties XVIII. and XIX.<br />

who seem to have been worshij)pers of Mentu-<br />

hetep. This is n<strong>at</strong>ural, if it was he who chose<br />

<strong>The</strong>bes as his capital, and who thus was the real<br />

founder of the <strong>The</strong>ban monarchy. To him was<br />

to be traced originally the gre<strong>at</strong> power which<br />

this city <strong>at</strong>tained, and also the pre-eminence<br />

v/hich the worship of Amon enjoyed after<br />

him.<br />

It is one of the first kings of the XVIIItli<br />

Dynasty, Amenhetep I., who, as far as we<br />

know, did again for Mentuhetep wh<strong>at</strong> Usertsen<br />

1 Maeiette, C<strong>at</strong>alogue, No. 605.<br />

'<br />

^<br />

;^$J$SS<br />

imTT<br />

o<br />

Alllllllll<br />

AS<br />

ffl'<br />

m T<br />

A<br />

had done before. He consecr<strong>at</strong>ed<br />

here several of his own st<strong>at</strong>ues to the<br />

king. One of them has come down to<br />

us nearly intact. It is now in the<br />

British Museum (PL xxv. aa). It was<br />

found near the ramp leading to the<br />

pl<strong>at</strong>form (see p. 26). It is 9 ft. 2 in.<br />

high, made of sandstone, and painted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> king wears the double crown, the<br />

Knver one being red and the upper one<br />

white. Tlie whole <strong>at</strong>titude is th<strong>at</strong> of<br />

the Osirian st<strong>at</strong>ues which occur in the<br />

<strong>temple</strong>s ;<br />

the emblems which the figure<br />

h<strong>el</strong>d in its hands have disappeared.<br />

This st<strong>at</strong>ue gives us the l-u name of<br />

the knig, Ka-uaf-taii (?), which was<br />

only known before from !M. Legrain's<br />

work <strong>at</strong> Karnak,^ and the sense of<br />

which appears to be, " Bull, taming<br />

the lands." A st<strong>el</strong>e, which unfortun-<br />

<strong>at</strong><strong>el</strong>y is not complete, shows this st<strong>at</strong>ue<br />

of Amenhetep, with another, and<br />

also th<strong>at</strong> of Mentuhetep (PI. xxv. b).<br />

Amenhetep's figure, wearing the double crown,<br />

and standing in the same <strong>at</strong>titude as the colossus<br />

of the British Museum, but with a slightly shorter<br />

dress (the >;ed-heb, not the Osirian, robe), is seen<br />

Ijefore a garden in which are planted<br />

four trees. Behind liim stands a st<strong>at</strong>ue<br />

of Neb-hepet-Ra, whose name is written<br />

wearing the crown of Lower Egypt.<br />

Opjiosite these two st<strong>at</strong>ues is Amen-<br />

hetep I. again this time with the crown of Upper<br />

Egypt, and behind him a king whose name has<br />

been omitted, but evidently is again Neb-hepet-<br />

Ra. <strong>The</strong> four st<strong>at</strong>ues are clothed with the short<br />

dress of the Sed festival, but in spite of this<br />

difference in detail, there is little doubt th<strong>at</strong><br />

they represent a row of colossi, of which the<br />

British Museum st<strong>at</strong>ue is one.^<br />

<strong>The</strong>se figures give us a curious example of the<br />

2 Annales du Service, 1904, p. 182.<br />

o<br />

^J<br />

3 <strong>The</strong> broken companion figures found near by wear<br />

the sed-heb costume.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!