11.05.2013 Views

Prefixation in English and Catalan - Departament de Filologia ...

Prefixation in English and Catalan - Departament de Filologia ...

Prefixation in English and Catalan - Departament de Filologia ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Because Re<strong>in</strong>hart’s mark<strong>in</strong>g procedures apply only for the arguments on a V’s<br />

Θ-grid, it will only be at the verbal no<strong>de</strong>, <strong>and</strong> not before, that arguments will get <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>x<br />

1 ([+] cluster), 2 ([-] cluster) or no mark<strong>in</strong>g at all (mixed cluster). That means that the<br />

Θ-roles of As <strong>and</strong> Ns cannot follow Re<strong>in</strong>hart’s mark<strong>in</strong>g system, s<strong>in</strong>ce this is not<br />

applicable to them. With respect to the relationship between the Θ-roles of As <strong>and</strong> Ns<br />

<strong>and</strong> their syntactic position (whether they are external or <strong>in</strong>ternal arguments), I follow<br />

the regularities (see (10)) already established <strong>in</strong> other work (for example, Williams<br />

1981b). That is, a [-c-m] role on an A will be external. The same role on a N will be<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>and</strong> the R-role, 9 which is associated with Ns, will be external. The result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pattern is as follows:<br />

(10) a. For As:<br />

i. [-c-m] → external<br />

b. For Ns:<br />

i. [R] → external<br />

ii. [-c-m] → <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

As will be seen, such approach seems problematic at first sight, because the external<br />

argument of an A (This apple is edible) is <strong>in</strong>ternalized when it is on the V’s no<strong>de</strong> (I ate<br />

the apple). However, this apparent <strong>in</strong>ternalization is expla<strong>in</strong>ed if we adopt the view<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to which only Θ-roles percolate, <strong>and</strong> the notions external or <strong>in</strong>ternal are<br />

<strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>ed by the category the Θ-roles are associated with (see Neeleman & Schipper<br />

(1992) for a similar view). In other words, the A will force an argument specified as<br />

[-c-m] to be external, whereas the same role on a V will be given <strong>in</strong><strong>de</strong>x 2, which will<br />

<strong>de</strong>term<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>ternal merg<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

2.2 Two analyses of reflexives: unergative vs. unaccusative<br />

9<br />

The source of the R-role is to be found <strong>in</strong> Williams (1981b), who notes that Ns also have external Θroles.<br />

In sentence (i),<br />

(i) I consi<strong>de</strong>r that [<strong>de</strong>struction of a city by evil forces]<br />

the predicative NP <strong>de</strong>struction has two <strong>in</strong>ternal arguments: the Theme a city <strong>and</strong> the Agent evil forces, but<br />

it also has an external argument which has no counterpart <strong>in</strong> the verbal system, i.e. that, which he gives<br />

the label R. That is, <strong>de</strong>struction of a city by evil forces is predicated of that. “The label R is meant to<br />

suggest ‘referential’, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is this argument position (R) that is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> referential uses of NPs as<br />

well” (p. 86)<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!