01.06.2013 Views

Queensland Life Sciences Industry Report 2012 (PDF, 3.5MB)

Queensland Life Sciences Industry Report 2012 (PDF, 3.5MB)

Queensland Life Sciences Industry Report 2012 (PDF, 3.5MB)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>Life</strong> <strong>Sciences</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

64<br />

10.COMMERCIAL INDICATORS<br />

“Existing shareholders contributed the majority of total funds raised<br />

by companies in 2011 (68.8%). While ‘Other private equity’ was also<br />

a significant source of finance (19.9%), Venture capital accounted for<br />

only 2.9% of the total raised in 2011.”<br />

10.1 Commercialisation<br />

10.1.1 Commercialisation — All Respondents<br />

Respondents ranked the strategies they would<br />

likely employ to commercialise their main<br />

technology, product or service. The top three<br />

strategies in 2009 and 2011 are shown in Table 55.<br />

Figure 29 shows the spread of responses for each of<br />

the options. The most likely strategy was in-house<br />

development (Table 55; Figure 29). The strategies<br />

most often referred to as ‘least likely’ in both 2009<br />

and 2011, were an initial public offering (IPO) or the<br />

spinning out of a company.<br />

TABLE 55: Most likely commercialisation strategy to<br />

be employed (90 respondents)<br />

Rank 2011 2009<br />

1 In-house development In-house development<br />

2 Collaborative venture Out-Licensing<br />

3 Out-Licensing Collaborative venture<br />

10.1.2 Commercialisation –<br />

Companies vs. Research Organisations<br />

The highest ranking commercialisation strategies<br />

for companies (74 respondents) and research<br />

organisations (16 respondents) are shown in<br />

Table 56.<br />

TABLE 56: Most likely commercialisation<br />

strategy employed<br />

Rank Companies Research<br />

Organisations<br />

1 In-house development Out-licensing<br />

2 Collaborative venture Collaborative venture<br />

3 Out-Licensing Spin-out company<br />

The majority of companies (40 of 69 companies;<br />

58%) intended to fully commercialise their<br />

technology/product or complete early stage<br />

commercialisation activities (e.g. later stage clinical<br />

development, pilot plant; 12 of 69 companies; 17%),<br />

before realising their primary commercial outcome.<br />

A minority of companies indicated that they planned<br />

to only complete proof-of-concept activities (9%) or<br />

the R&D phase (3%) before realising their primary<br />

commercial outcome.<br />

In contrast, the majority of research organisations<br />

indicated their intention to realise their primary<br />

commercial outcome following completion of<br />

the R&D phase (9 out of 16; 56%) or proof of<br />

concept (5 out of 16; 31%). None intended to take<br />

their technology/product through to early or full<br />

commercialisation.<br />

Figure 29: Strategies respondents will likely employ to commercialise their main technology (90 respondents)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!