04.06.2013 Views

SPEED UP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Review<br />

“In both<br />

instances,<br />

the 2.6GHz i7<br />

Fusion Drive<br />

Mac mini<br />

was around<br />

six times<br />

faster”<br />

112<br />

And so we come to the allimportant<br />

question of performance.<br />

This is the area in which we expected<br />

some serious improvements, most<br />

noticeably with the Fusion Drive<br />

model. In order to get a clearer<br />

sense of just how much better the<br />

performance of the Fusion Drive Mac<br />

mini is in real terms (over and above<br />

the Geekbench score, which you’ll<br />

also find in this review), we ran a series<br />

of stress tests on it and the 2.5GHz<br />

dual-core variant. The first test was<br />

simple boot timing with no apps<br />

opening. The basic Mac mini took<br />

about 28 seconds, which is pretty<br />

good, however the Fusion Drive took<br />

only 12 seconds from pressing the<br />

power button to a fully functioning<br />

Dashboard and Desktop. As we would<br />

discover, that was mere child’s play.<br />

A slightly more intensive test was<br />

duplicating a 14.47GB file on the<br />

desktop. This file had a mixture of<br />

music, films, photos, documents and a<br />

Up close with the mini<br />

The newly updated Mac mini in the spotlight<br />

It’s all in<br />

the back<br />

All of the ports<br />

you’ll want to<br />

access on the Mac<br />

mini are placed<br />

at the rear, which<br />

some may find a<br />

little awkward to<br />

access<br />

Body<br />

The body of<br />

the Mac mini is<br />

also unchanged<br />

with the same<br />

highly recyclable<br />

aluminium<br />

enclosure (as Apple<br />

describes it), as<br />

we’ve become<br />

used to<br />

copy of BioShock 2. On the basic Mac<br />

mini it took a leisurely six minutes to<br />

complete the task. The Fusion Drive<br />

trounced this, managing the same<br />

task in only one minute, 15 seconds.<br />

Likewise when we attempted to open<br />

all the pre-installed apps on the Mac<br />

minis, plus Aperture, which we added<br />

to both, we saw the Fusion Drive<br />

model ready to use in just 16 seconds,<br />

while the other model took around<br />

one minute, 40 seconds. So, in both<br />

instances, the 2.6GHz i7 Fusion Drive<br />

Mac mini was around six times faster.<br />

With all these apps still open we<br />

went about attempting to edit some<br />

of those photos we mentioned in<br />

Aperture. Again, the difference was<br />

stark. The basic mini struggled to keep<br />

up with our inputs as we tried to move<br />

the sliders around and there was a<br />

delay in seeing them applied to the<br />

image. For the Fusion Drive though,<br />

as by now you will expect, this was<br />

no problem at all. It really didn’t seem<br />

Audio In<br />

It’s interesting to see that the Audio In remains despite having been removed<br />

from the latest iMac. Some GarageBand and Logic users may well be pleased<br />

USB 3.0<br />

Upgraded from the<br />

USB 2.0 ports in the<br />

previous Mac mini<br />

model, it’s the only<br />

externally visible<br />

change to this device<br />

Sharp edges<br />

The sharper corners<br />

of the Mac mini are<br />

something we would<br />

have liked to see<br />

softened, but aesthetic<br />

changes clearly<br />

weren’t high priority<br />

this time around

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!