FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential
FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential
FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
United Nations petition — incomplete report<br />
Mr Arne RUSET (IQ 140 — cf Doc #377, pp 41–44), Mr Ivar<br />
OFTEDAHL (IQ 140 — cf Doc #377, pp 28 and 41) and Mr Carsten<br />
SMITH (IQ 153,5 — cf p 68 etc) are amongst the most dangerous.<br />
Average Stanford-Binet IQ for Norwegian physicians and nurses are<br />
125 and 118, respectively (i.e full-scale WAIS IQ 123,5 and 117,<br />
respectively — cf Doc #1536, pp 85–86). As regards Norwegian<br />
Parliament members, average Stanford-Binet IQ is 127,5 (possessing<br />
a general IQ of 152, the theologue Mr Inge LØNNING is the<br />
noometric dux of this lamentable assembly suggestively termed the<br />
―Snake Pit‖ or ―Pillbox‖), and for Norwegian police officers 113,5<br />
(i.e full-scale Wechsler IQ 112,5 — cf Doc #1536, p 86).<br />
The best qualified Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service agents all<br />
has an IQ between 128 and 132 (cf Doc #377, p 41. While 90% of<br />
regular Norwegian police officers has clearly marked, psychopathic<br />
personality traits, the actual prevalence of explicit psychopathy/sa-<br />
dism are 100% amongst the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service<br />
officers), and — as stated in Doc #3217 (p 106, cf pp 103–104) — the<br />
Norwegian Minister of Gross Injustice, Mr Odd Einar DØRUM, has a<br />
Stanford-Binet IQ of 137.<br />
With his 155 Stanford-Binet score Mr Egil Tryggve STORÅS (cf<br />
Doc #377, p 41) possess‘ the highest general IQ of the Norwegian co-<br />
unty physicians and amongst those actual to interrogate/prosecute usw<br />
in this case. Mr Storås is mentally unsound, and — fearing personal dis-<br />
grace and professional setbacks etc, he‘s hardly expected to deliver<br />
truthful testimonies (— though, of course, he‘ll attempt to convince<br />
the jury et al his explanations and views are perfectly honest and<br />
unbiased).<br />
Background information<br />
The reader should constantly keep in mind Norwegian authorities unscrupu-<br />
lously will exploit every adequate opportunity to erase, steal and<br />
falsify/alter to their advantage any piece of evidence communicated through<br />
nearby complaint — empirically they‘re much prone to manipulate, espy, ha-<br />
rass/intimidate, incarcerate, obstruct, weaken and explicitly harm/attack potent-<br />
ial/actual witnesses in this and other cases where Norwegian officials are the<br />
factual culprits.....and the presentation of forthcoming matter are by and large<br />
accommodated these disquieting facts.<br />
10<br />
<strong>FORMAL</strong> <strong>COMPLAINT</strong> VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY<br />
by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway<br />
10