FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

honorless foes!
United Nations petition — incomplete report
As natural for hominoid faeces, my state paid enemies clung foully together
also at Hjelset — now the altogether false and trenchantly sphacelated concoc-
tion fabricated to incarcerate me had to be ―consolidated‖ through pretendedly
scrupulous, catamnestic annotations etc.
The misbegotten son of a manic-depressive drunkard, the psychologist Mr Hans
Peter MØLLER was amongst the first creeps I encountered at the madhouse —
sporting an unkempt hairstyle conspicuously resembling a machine-gunned
magpie‘s nest, he decidedly had the look of a bombed and shell-shocked circus
clown!
A fundamentally pusillanimous, immature and perfidious good-for-nothing, Mr
Møller compensated for some of his shortcomings through attributing his own,
despicable frailness and vile nature to me. Criminally jumbled up with the
pharisaic falsehood characterizing the abject weakling and hitlerite alienist*
(*while 20% of primary care physicians [general practitioners] in Norway can
be correctly described as clearly anti-Semitic and/or naziphile, corresponding fi-
gure for psychiatrists pendulates between 50 and 55%. Viewed as a single
group, medical practitioners in Norway ‘ve been extremely overrated —
morally,
intellectually, socially and medicomechanically) Mr Magnus AASHEIM, the
commentaries entered in the ―medical record‖ by Mr Møller presumably belongs
to the most low-minded fiction ever penned in Norwegian!
In said record the out-and-out criminal and medico/politician authorized assaults
launched by the police in Oslo had been described as purely imaginary, of
course, and the fibbing swine had shunned no iniquitous extremes to portray me
as paranoid and to cover-up their sickly vicious corruption.
As beforehand announced it‘s not my intention to furnish my diabolic foes with
especially useful information, so — at this point in the process — my direct co-
untercomments are tactically limited to declaring more than 90% of the slimy
stuff included in the scandalous record thoroughly false and deliberately mis-
guiding!
Acquainted with their forthcoming treachery long before they actually were
born in 1966 and 1970 respectively, it should nevertheless be underlined I al-
ways ‘ve held back any information my sisters prospectively could abuse — e.g
by passing it on to hostile persons.
When I met these fickle and neurotic wenches at Åndalsnes in 1992, they hadn‘t
seen me since 1984 — as for today, they both enjoy perpetual enemy-status due
29
FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY
by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway
29