FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

United Nations petition — incomplete report
Article 16
Each State Party shall undertake to prevent in any territory
under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treat-
ment or punishment which do not amount to torture as defined in
Article 1, when such acts are committed by or at the instigation of or
with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person
acting in an official capacity. In particular, the obligations contained
in Articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 shall apply with the substitution for refe-
rences to torture or references to other forms of cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment or punishment.
The provisions of this Convention are without prejudice to the
provisions of any other international instrument or national law
which prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or pun-
ishment or which relates to extradition or expulsion.
Whereas the Hippocratic oath lay emphasis on honesty, respectfulness and
benevolence towards patients and impels physicians to champion international
human rights and exercise their professional judgment uninfluenced by political
pressure, physicians and other "health" personnel involved in this ill-omened
case maliciously 've displayed the most inexpiable disregard inasmuch as dutiful
compliance with ethical stipulations, the statutory rights of others and their
vocational integrity otherwise are concerned.....honestly; it's stark impossible to
find even the slightest trace of formally mitigating circumstances, respectability
or professional adequacy in the uninterrupted orgy of lawless terrorism
satanically indulged in by Norwegian medics AO since 1992!
Anyhow, let's make it perfectly clear right now; the actual and radically massive
violations of quoted articles noways applies to the Norwegian public "health"
service alone — corresponding malversation has continuously been schemed
and illicitly ratified v.g by diverse governmental bodies (cf pp 24–25, 29–31,
68–74 and 83–88 usw), and does also — largely — include the other officials
and establishments referred to as "Accused" at page 2 of nearby Complaint.
Cf Doc #4575, p 117 etc:
"All interference from Norwegian authorities in this case 've been
unilaterally destructive, invidious, unwelcomed and
largely criminal — clearly reflecting the mental illness, habitual
double-dealing and emetic disregard for the human rights and
fundamental freedoms of man indeed characterizing
most of the malefactors."
144
FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY
by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway
144