13.06.2013 Views

FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

United Nations petition — incomplete report<br />

'cause, quorum pars magna fui; Norway, in symptomatic conformity with its<br />

star-crossed NPSMS prevalence* (*cf pp 122–124 &c), is — as far as one<br />

knows — the only nation where official "health" personnel AO has rushed off a<br />

formal application for carte blanche experimentation with and illegal/lifelong<br />

incarceration of a completely unconsenting/guiltless person exclusively because<br />

he, supposedly, were possessed of outstanding intelligence!<br />

According to the partially disallowed plot, the chosen victim and experimentee<br />

was to be portrayed as a particularly dangerous maniac by means of false<br />

accusations/statements and massive psychotomimetic drugging — thus<br />

"justifying" the internment usw (cf pp 22–31 and 80–103 etc)!<br />

Careful investigation has confirmed the planned experiments included regular/<br />

diversified torture, sexual abuse, and a considerable number life-endangering<br />

hostilities which — perhaps — had shocked the infamous Nazi doctor Josef<br />

MENGELE…!<br />

Notwithstanding the fact Norwegian senior civil, ecclesiastical (cf Doc #7011<br />

&c) and military officials solemnly has declared obedience/allegiance to the<br />

Constitution* (*cf ARTICLE 21, p 163 of this Petition), Article 7 in the<br />

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights unambiguously lays<br />

down that:<br />

―No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel,<br />

inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.<br />

In particular, no one shall be subjected without his<br />

free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.‖<br />

The Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, has turned international<br />

human rights conventions/covenants into a fundamental part of Norwegian<br />

legislation (cf pp 3 and 155), and Article 110 c. of the Norwegian Constitution<br />

correspondingly reads (cf pp 165–166) — sic:<br />

"It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State<br />

to respect and ensure human rights. Specific provis-<br />

ions for the implementation of treaties hereof shall be<br />

determined by law."<br />

Anyway — as things actually have turned out in this exceedingly macabre case,<br />

said experimentee has been diabolically and continuously terrorized/surveilled<br />

in his private house etc since 1992 (cf pp 15–25, 28–31, 68–74 and 80–84, item<br />

Doc #4588 &c), and the stark psychopathic culprits has all the time, and without<br />

exception, been perfectly aware the thoroughly criminal extent/implications of<br />

184<br />

<strong>FORMAL</strong> <strong>COMPLAINT</strong> VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY<br />

by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway<br />

184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!