FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential
FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential
FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
United Nations petition — incomplete report<br />
'cause, quorum pars magna fui; Norway, in symptomatic conformity with its<br />
star-crossed NPSMS prevalence* (*cf pp 122–124 &c), is — as far as one<br />
knows — the only nation where official "health" personnel AO has rushed off a<br />
formal application for carte blanche experimentation with and illegal/lifelong<br />
incarceration of a completely unconsenting/guiltless person exclusively because<br />
he, supposedly, were possessed of outstanding intelligence!<br />
According to the partially disallowed plot, the chosen victim and experimentee<br />
was to be portrayed as a particularly dangerous maniac by means of false<br />
accusations/statements and massive psychotomimetic drugging — thus<br />
"justifying" the internment usw (cf pp 22–31 and 80–103 etc)!<br />
Careful investigation has confirmed the planned experiments included regular/<br />
diversified torture, sexual abuse, and a considerable number life-endangering<br />
hostilities which — perhaps — had shocked the infamous Nazi doctor Josef<br />
MENGELE…!<br />
Notwithstanding the fact Norwegian senior civil, ecclesiastical (cf Doc #7011<br />
&c) and military officials solemnly has declared obedience/allegiance to the<br />
Constitution* (*cf ARTICLE 21, p 163 of this Petition), Article 7 in the<br />
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights unambiguously lays<br />
down that:<br />
―No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel,<br />
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.<br />
In particular, no one shall be subjected without his<br />
free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.‖<br />
The Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, has turned international<br />
human rights conventions/covenants into a fundamental part of Norwegian<br />
legislation (cf pp 3 and 155), and Article 110 c. of the Norwegian Constitution<br />
correspondingly reads (cf pp 165–166) — sic:<br />
"It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State<br />
to respect and ensure human rights. Specific provis-<br />
ions for the implementation of treaties hereof shall be<br />
determined by law."<br />
Anyway — as things actually have turned out in this exceedingly macabre case,<br />
said experimentee has been diabolically and continuously terrorized/surveilled<br />
in his private house etc since 1992 (cf pp 15–25, 28–31, 68–74 and 80–84, item<br />
Doc #4588 &c), and the stark psychopathic culprits has all the time, and without<br />
exception, been perfectly aware the thoroughly criminal extent/implications of<br />
184<br />
<strong>FORMAL</strong> <strong>COMPLAINT</strong> VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY<br />
by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway<br />
184