FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

United Nations petition — incomplete report
severely disordered and thoroughly dikephobic wrongdoers will do whatever
practically feasible to cover up and belittle their errors/unsuitability/corruption
— frequently at the expense of wholly guiltless persons facing false accusations
and unwarranted castigation etc.
As for the latter case, special attention should be called to the average Stanford-
Binet IQ of Norwegian Parliament/Storting representatives at 127,5 (cf p 10) —
which, not surprisingly, is 10–14 crucial points below corresponding scores for
national/federal assembly members in any Euro-American country/state
socioeconomically comparable with Norway.
Without validating the factual foundation of his suppositions etc, it may be
thematically justifiable though to refer to assistant professor of psychology at
Princeton University* (*New Jersey, USA) — Mr Carl C BRIGHAM* (*creator
of the well-known "Scholastic Aptitude Test") — who, in 1923, published "A
Study of American Intelligence" where he concluded that the IQ of immigrants
increased in proportion to the number of years of US residence — a
phenomenon he ascribed to a lower proportion of Nordic blood over the years,
rather than increased familiarization with cultural and educational factors…!
Anyhow; the US Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 favored immigration
from northern Europe, and restricted the entry of persons from other areas
referred to as "biologically inferior" ——
At the pages 9 and 85 I've fixed the lowest acceptable Stanford-Binet IQ of
different judges/experts at 145 and 140, respectively — but indeed; this does not
imply said scores are absolutely and professionally adequate! What indicated
minimum levels does mark, however, are the highest IQ scores practically
attainable a number of circumstantial factors and conventional requirements*
realistically considered (*amongst the formal prerequisites, a sufficient and high
degree of moral integrity, impartiality/independence and educational
competency are indispensable).
While a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 140 typically will enable otherwise
competent members of the Norwegian courts of appeals to handle around 80%
of the various lawsuits in a justifiable manner, a ditto IQ of 258 are required to
keenly perceive and adequately evaluate usw the intricate nuances and
multifarious facts relevant to the most complicated cases brought before these
appellate tribunals. Although the present courts of appeals comprises a few
judges with a Stanford-Binet IQ equalling or slightly exceeding 140, 45–50% of
nowadays judgments/sentences should be overruled on account of regular
corruption and the number/severity of procedural errors…..and, finally; whereas
corruption are exlex altogether and portrayed degree of erroneousness legally
unacceptable, it should be formally correct to render null and void all verdicts
and conclusions passed on by these incompetent and obscenely pretentious
kangaroo courts whatsoever — cf Doc #627 item nearby Complaint pp 2–8 and
84–88 etc!
146
FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY
by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway
146