FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

United Nations petition — incomplete report
The manifestly morbid preoccupation with supernormal intelligence and human
genius constantly displayed by Norwegian physicians, psychologists, politicians,
police officers et al has been touched upon earlier in this report (v p 118 — cf
Doc #1536, p 85), and it should be timely to supply foregoing information with
a few germane remarks.
Studying the thousands of registered crimes and calamitous boo-boos wholly
ascribable to Norwegian officials and local authorities the last decennium, we
are struck not only by the unprovoked diabolism and radical unsoundness
characterizing these misdeeds, but by the marked lack of foresight and stark
fatuity as well.
Inasmuch as essential parts of our noometric capability may be adequately
evaluated through standardized and accurately scaled intelligence tests…..and
given that we fairly correctly may equate corresponding IQ scores with our
immanent/potential ability to acceptably handle diverse practical situations and
precisely grasp more or less abstract/intricate problems/ideas professionally or
otherwise encountered, we may assuredly ascribe much of said improvidence
and bêtises ex officio to insufficient psychometric intelligence.
At this point those of you familiar with the common classification of IQ scores
may feel somewhat bewildered, as it previously 've been correctly stated several
of the culprits actual to prosecute in this case possess' a general IQ equal or
superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale (cf pp 9–10). IQs corresponding to
— or exceeding — indicated score are normally regarded as highly impressive,
and many psychologists will set the intelligence quotient for "potential genius"
at 140 or over. In the general Norwegian population 1 out of 190 people are
expected to achieve a Stanford-Binet IQ of 140, and there are roughly 3 men for
every woman reaching specified score.
Howbeit —; comprehensive observations here in Norway bears witness to the
fact individuals with a Stanford-Binet IQ in the 130–155 range are essentially
unable to meet the dianoetic requirements necessary to acquire even passable
understanding of more intricate scientific, moral and purely logical &c
causata/implications/problems. Typically earning their university and first-class
degrees relatively hands down, these noometrically — and oftentimes
professionally — incompetent persons are likely to occupy central community
positions. In cases where the shortcomer has maintained his/her moral and
eunoic integrity, the psychometric inadequacy may be accidentally fatal indeed
— though — regularly and pragmatically amendable, as the intellectually
subpotent faultdoer will be genuinely eager to admit, correct and avoid e.g
professional mistakes induced by noometrically overtaxing demands.
Inasmuch as the dianoetic deficiency and related/professional fall downs are
directly pertinent to NPSMS afflicted individuals/officials* (*cf pp 122–124) —
which conspicuously often is the case in Norway, we empirically knows these
145
FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY
by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway
145