19.06.2013 Views

Editorial

Editorial

Editorial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86<br />

The Terpandros Orchestra playing at Casteliotissa Hall.<br />

scales which were composed of tones and semitones<br />

(diatonic scales), there existed those which<br />

were composed of semitones and three-semitones<br />

(chromatic scales), and others composed<br />

of quarters of tones and two-toned intervals<br />

(henarmonic). The kind of intervals used<br />

by each scale is called genus. Each genus had<br />

different shades which were called colors. The<br />

fact that would seem strange to the ancient<br />

Greeks is that contemporary scales would sound<br />

disonal, having fallen victims of blending. Because<br />

of the fact that ancient scales were based on natural<br />

intervals in accordance with Pythagoras’s<br />

findings in the 6th century BC semitones and<br />

tones were not equal between them, with the<br />

result that it was difficult to transpose musical<br />

pieces (a fact that did not bother the ancient<br />

Greeks, since their melodies were mostly monodies).<br />

In the 16th AC century, western musicians sacrificed<br />

the melody of unequal musical intervals<br />

in order to gain complete freedom for the transportation<br />

(for the sake of polyphony), and comfort<br />

for the practical use of keyboard instruments.<br />

This was achieved with the equalization<br />

of the twelve semitones of the octave, in other<br />

words the equal temperament where semitones<br />

become equal, and fourths and fifths are allowed<br />

to become slightly imperfect. So a compromise<br />

was found between the laws of nature and the<br />

needs of art.<br />

At this point it should be stressed that ancient<br />

Greeks had a different concept of concord from<br />

our own. To them there were only four perfect<br />

concords: Unison, the eighth, the fifth and<br />

the fourth. A noticeable fact is that the ancient<br />

Greeks never considered the third as a concord<br />

interval, although it forms the basis of contemporary<br />

harmony. In fact Gavdentios calls<br />

it disonal as an intermediate step between<br />

concord and discord intervals.<br />

One can easily understand how ancient Greek<br />

music gave a variety of choices regarding the<br />

kind of intervals used (genuses, chroiai) and<br />

to the way that unites them (systems).<br />

So a composer could compose a piece and<br />

perform it differently if he wished to do so.<br />

He could change the scale (like today) with the<br />

selection of another tone transposing the piece.<br />

He could change the mode that is to do a modulation.<br />

Today this is also done mainly between<br />

Major and Minor scales. He could change the<br />

genus and chroia that is to do a complete change<br />

of the piece. Today this is not possible because<br />

melody uses only the diatonic scales. He<br />

could change the system from synimmeno (conjuct)<br />

to diazevgmeno (disjunct). That is to do<br />

a systematic change. Apart from the melody, he<br />

could also (like today) change the rhythm, speed<br />

and character of the piece by using the rest of<br />

the changes.<br />

It is obvious that where Western music was seeking<br />

beauty through polyphonic multiplication

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!