20.06.2013 Views

impaginato piccolo - Società Italiana di Parassitologia (SoIPa)

impaginato piccolo - Società Italiana di Parassitologia (SoIPa)

impaginato piccolo - Società Italiana di Parassitologia (SoIPa)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60<br />

(Kijlstra et al., 2006). Regar<strong>di</strong>ng pigs, the majority of<br />

the infections are sub-clinical or latent and few clinical<br />

cases of toxoplasmosis have been reported. However,<br />

four outbreaks of <strong>di</strong>sease with mortality in <strong>di</strong>fferent pig<br />

herds have been recently reported in the Lombar<strong>di</strong>a<br />

and Emilia-Romagna regions of northern Italy<br />

(Gelmetti et al., 1999).<br />

Concerning small ruminants, T. gon<strong>di</strong>i is recognized as<br />

one of major cause of infectious reproductive failure in<br />

several countries of the world causing fetal resorption,<br />

abortion at any stage of pregnancy, fetal mummification,<br />

stillbirth or birth of live but weak offspring. The<br />

important role played by T. gon<strong>di</strong>i in ovine and caprine<br />

abortion as been documented in the Sar<strong>di</strong>nia region<br />

(Tola et al., 2002; Masala et al., 2003); out of a total of<br />

366 ovine aborted samples from Sar<strong>di</strong>nia, T. gon<strong>di</strong>i<br />

DNA was detected in 18.1% of fetuses and 13.1% of<br />

placentae (Masala et al., 2007).<br />

In conclusion, the present paper shows that seroprevalence<br />

data on toxoplasmosis in livestock are not uni-<br />

L. Rinal<strong>di</strong>, A. Scala - Toxoplasmosis in livestock<br />

Table 1. Seroprevalence data on T. gon<strong>di</strong>i recorded in livestock from <strong>di</strong>fferent Italian regions over the last 3 decades<br />

Livestock<br />

species<br />

Cattle North<br />

Sicilia<br />

Region No. examined<br />

animals<br />

255<br />

317<br />

Seroprevalence<br />

(%)<br />

92.0<br />

11.3<br />

Diagnostic<br />

method<br />

DAT<br />

IFAT<br />

References<br />

Avezza et al., 1993<br />

Vesco et al., 2005<br />

Buffaloes Campania 187 94.0 MAT Persechino et al., 1980<br />

Sheep<br />

Goats<br />

Lombar<strong>di</strong>a<br />

Emilia Romagna<br />

Campania<br />

Puglia and<br />

Basilicata<br />

Sicilia<br />

Sardegna<br />

Lazio<br />

Puglia and Basilicata<br />

352<br />

374<br />

1,170<br />

306<br />

321<br />

1,390<br />

1,876<br />

7,149<br />

29,886<br />

1,043<br />

198<br />

244<br />

Sar<strong>di</strong>nia 2,445<br />

Pigs North<br />

Emilia Romagna<br />

Umbria<br />

Sicilia<br />

Sardegna<br />

Horses<br />

(human<br />

consumption)<br />

4,562<br />

90<br />

1,521<br />

576<br />

1,035<br />

408<br />

78.0<br />

69.0<br />

28.5<br />

88.6<br />

56.1<br />

0.1<br />

49.9<br />

28.4<br />

9.9<br />

19.2<br />

5.4<br />

51.3<br />

95.0<br />

68.9<br />

12.3<br />

5.6<br />

11.7<br />

4.0<br />

64<br />

9.0<br />

16.7<br />

21.3/20.0<br />

15.2<br />

LAT<br />

IFAT<br />

IFAT<br />

IFAT<br />

IFAT<br />

IFAT<br />

ELISA<br />

IFAT IgG<br />

IFAT IgM<br />

IFAT IgG<br />

IFAT IgM<br />

ELISA<br />

MAT<br />

IFAT<br />

IFAT IgG<br />

IFAT IgM<br />

IFAT IgG<br />

IFAT IgM<br />

IFAT<br />

LAT<br />

IFAT<br />

ELISA/IFAT<br />

ELISA<br />

Gaffuri et al., 2006<br />

Baldelli and Pietrobelli, 1985<br />

Fusco et al., 2007<br />

Puccini et al., 1981<br />

Puccini et al., 1983<br />

Balbo et al., 1980<br />

Vesco et al., 2007<br />

Masala et al., 2003<br />

formly <strong>di</strong>stributed along the whole Italy. In ad<strong>di</strong>tion,<br />

these data, although revealing a scenario at risk from a<br />

zootechnical and sanitary point of views, represent a<br />

situation highly heterogeneous, probably due to the <strong>di</strong>fferent<br />

sampling and laboratory techniques utilized.<br />

Thus, a coor<strong>di</strong>nated national-scale survey on toxoplasmosis<br />

in livestock - based on homogeneous sampling<br />

and laboratory techniques - is strongly needed, in order<br />

to better assess the actual epidemiological situation of<br />

this under-estimated zoonosis in livestock and to clarify<br />

factors that influence its presence and <strong>di</strong>stribution.<br />

References<br />

Tola et al., 2006<br />

Natale et al., 2006<br />

De Capraris and Gravino, 1981<br />

Puccini et al., 1983<br />

Masala et al., 2003<br />

Tola et al., 2006<br />

Various 163 30.7 MAT Tassi, 2006<br />

Genchi et al., 1991<br />

Soldati et al., 1986<br />

Piergili Fioretti et al., 2008<br />

Vesco et al., 2006<br />

Scala et al., 2008<br />

Chickens Various 80 12.5 MAT Dubey et al., 2008<br />

Legend: DAT = <strong>di</strong>rect agglutination test; IFAT = in<strong>di</strong>rect fluorescent antibody tests; MAT = microscopic agglutination test; LAT = latex<br />

agglutination test; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.<br />

Avezza F, Greppi G, Agosti M, Belloli A, Faverzani S (1993). La<br />

toxoplasmosi bovina: risultati <strong>di</strong> un indagine siero-epidemiologica.<br />

Atti Soc Ital Buiatria 25: 621-624.<br />

Balbo SM, Iannizzotto G, Jannotta V (1980). Indagine sierologia<br />

sulle forme più importanti <strong>di</strong> aborti infettivi degli ovini in Sicilia.<br />

Clin Vet 104: 46-52.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!