21.06.2013 Views

Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology, 23rd Edition

Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology, 23rd Edition

Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology, 23rd Edition

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

176 SECTION III Central & Peripheral Neurophysiology<br />

two components <strong>of</strong> pain pathways. From VPL nuclei in the<br />

thalamus, fibers project to SI and SII. This is the pathway<br />

responsible for the discriminative aspect <strong>of</strong> pain, and is also<br />

called the neospinothalamic tract. In contrast, the pathway<br />

that includes synapses in the brain stem reticular formation and<br />

centrolateral thalamic nucleus projects to the frontal lobe, limbic<br />

system, and insula. This pathway mediates the motivational-affect<br />

component <strong>of</strong> pain and is called the<br />

paleospinothalamic tract.<br />

In the central nervous system (CNS), visceral sensation<br />

travels along the same pathways as somatic sensation in the<br />

spinothalamic tracts and thalamic radiations, and the cortical<br />

receiving areas for visceral sensation are intermixed with the<br />

somatic receiving areas.<br />

CORTICAL PLASTICITY<br />

It is now clear that the extensive neuronal connections described<br />

above are not innate and immutable but can be<br />

changed relatively rapidly by experience to reflect the use <strong>of</strong><br />

the represented area. Clinical Box 11–1 describes remarkable<br />

changes in cortical and thalamic organization that occur in response<br />

to limb amputation to lead to the phenomenon <strong>of</strong><br />

phantom limb pain.<br />

Numerous animal studies point to dramatic reorganization<br />

<strong>of</strong> cortical structures. If a digit is amputated in a monkey, the<br />

cortical representation <strong>of</strong> the neighboring digits spreads into<br />

the cortical area that was formerly occupied by the representation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the amputated digit. Conversely, if the cortical area<br />

representing a digit is removed, the somatosensory map <strong>of</strong> the<br />

digit moves to the surrounding cortex. Extensive, long-term<br />

deafferentation <strong>of</strong> limbs leads to even more dramatic shifts in<br />

somatosensory representation in the cortex, with, for example,<br />

the limb cortical area responding to touching the face.<br />

The explanation <strong>of</strong> these shifts appears to be that cortical connections<br />

<strong>of</strong> sensory units to the cortex have extensive convergence<br />

and divergence, with connections that can become<br />

weak with disuse and strong with use.<br />

Plasticity <strong>of</strong> this type occurs not only with input from cutaneous<br />

receptors but also with input in other sensory systems.<br />

For example, in cats with small lesions <strong>of</strong> the retina, the cortical<br />

area for the blinded spot begins to respond to light striking<br />

other areas <strong>of</strong> the retina. Development <strong>of</strong> the adult pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

retinal projections to the visual cortex is another example <strong>of</strong><br />

this plasticity. At a more extreme level, experimentally routing<br />

visual input to the auditory cortex during development creates<br />

visual receptive fields in the auditory system.<br />

PET scanning in humans also documents plastic changes,<br />

sometimes from one sensory modality to another. Thus, for<br />

example, tactile and auditory stimuli increase metabolic activity<br />

in the visual cortex in blind individuals. Conversely, deaf<br />

individuals respond faster and more accurately than normal<br />

individuals to moving stimuli in the visual periphery. Plasticity<br />

also occurs in the motor cortex. These findings illustrate<br />

the malleability <strong>of</strong> the brain and its ability to adapt.<br />

CLINICAL BOX 11–1<br />

Phantom Limb Pain<br />

In 1551, a military surgeon, Ambroise Pare, wrote, ”. . . the<br />

patients, long after the amputation is made, say they still<br />

feel pain in the amputated part. Of this they complain<br />

strongly, a thing worthy <strong>of</strong> wonder and almost incredible to<br />

people who have not experienced this.” This is perhaps the<br />

earliest description <strong>of</strong> phantom limb pain. Between 50%<br />

and 80% <strong>of</strong> amputees experience phantom sensations, usually<br />

pain, in the region <strong>of</strong> their amputated limb. Phantom<br />

sensations may also occur after the removal <strong>of</strong> body parts<br />

other than the limbs, for example, after amputation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

breast, extraction <strong>of</strong> a tooth (phantom tooth pain), or removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> an eye (phantom eye syndrome). Numerous theories<br />

have been evoked to explain this phenomenon. The<br />

current theory is based on evidence that the brain can reorganize<br />

if sensory input is cut <strong>of</strong>f. The ventral posterior thalamic<br />

nucleus is one example where this change can occur.<br />

In patients who have had their leg amputated, single neuron<br />

recordings show that the thalamic region that once received<br />

input from the leg and foot now respond to stimulation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the stump (thigh). Others have demonstrated<br />

remapping <strong>of</strong> the somatosensory cortex. For example, in<br />

some individuals who have had an arm amputated, stroking<br />

different parts <strong>of</strong> the face can lead to the feeling <strong>of</strong> being<br />

touched in the area <strong>of</strong> the missing limb. Spinal cord stimulation<br />

has been shown to be an effective therapy for phantom<br />

pain. Electric current is passed through an electrode that is<br />

placed next to the spinal cord to stimulate spinal pathways.<br />

This interferes with the impulses ascending to the brain and<br />

lessens the pain felt in the phantom limb. Instead, amputees<br />

feel a tingling sensation in the phantom limb.<br />

EFFECTS OF CNS LESIONS<br />

Ablation <strong>of</strong> SI in animals causes deficits in position sense and in<br />

the ability to discriminate size and shape. Ablation <strong>of</strong> SII causes<br />

deficits in learning based on tactile discrimination. Ablation <strong>of</strong><br />

SI causes deficits in sensory processing in SII, whereas ablation<br />

<strong>of</strong> SII has no gross effect on processing in SI. Thus, it seems clear<br />

that SI and SII process sensory information in series rather than<br />

in parallel and that SII is concerned with further elaboration <strong>of</strong><br />

sensory data. SI also projects to the posterior parietal cortex<br />

(Figure 11–3), and lesions <strong>of</strong> this association area produce complex<br />

abnormalities <strong>of</strong> spatial orientation on the contralateral<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the body.<br />

In experimental animals and humans, cortical lesions do<br />

not abolish somatic sensation. Proprioception and fine touch<br />

are most affected by cortical lesions. Temperature sensibility<br />

is less affected, and pain sensibility is only slightly altered.<br />

Only very extensive lesions completely interrupt touch sensation.<br />

When the dorsal columns are destroyed, vibratory sensation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!