A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto
A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto
A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 29. UF pre-treatment. Adapted from (Wolf, Siverns & Monti 2005).<br />
The choice of a pre-treatment system for <strong>Aalto</strong>RO is not an easy one. This is mainly due<br />
to the fact that in regular systems the fundamental operating principle is different than in<br />
<strong>Aalto</strong>RO. In standard RO systems, the pre-treatment can be done at the point most<br />
convenient for it, typically onshore, and before the pressurization to a high pressure. In<br />
<strong>Aalto</strong>RO the pressurization dictates all other activities as it occurs at the bottom of the<br />
sea in the WEC, typically at 15 meters of depth and at 500 meters distance from the<br />
shore.<br />
Pre-treating water at a high pressure is practically impossible and therefore it has to be<br />
done before the WEC. But pre-treating water at the bottom of the sea is also extremely<br />
difficult. The pre-treatment for <strong>Aalto</strong>RO cannot be done either by conventional or by<br />
membrane pre-treatment. Yet, there are two mindsets for determining the suitable pretreatment<br />
system. Either to produce pre-treated water with excellent quality to minimize<br />
the maintenance of the RO membranes, or to have allowing pre-treatment and to wash<br />
RO membranes frequently to maintain the desired performance (Taniguchi 1997). Due<br />
to the challenges posed by <strong>Aalto</strong>RO, the second mindset is adopted in this thesis.<br />
Two main challenges for the <strong>Aalto</strong>RO pre-treatment system are small particles (e.g.<br />
sand particles) and biological fouling. With a carefully designed intake structure it is<br />
possible to minimize the incoming foulants, and with coarse and fine screens the<br />
filtration can be taken up to a level of 100 microns. Filtration to a better degree has been<br />
deemed too difficult, and therefore the system will have to be able to handle small<br />
particles of under that size.<br />
Biological fouling and scaling of soluble components can be taken care of with various<br />
chemicals. Antiscalants have been a standard option in RO systems for a long time, but<br />
recently there have been encouraging reports of antibiofouling chemicals as well<br />
(Matsumoto 2012). With the use of these chemicals, it has been estimated that scaling<br />
and biofouling will not pose a major threat to <strong>Aalto</strong>RO.<br />
The proposed pre-treatment system for <strong>Aalto</strong>RO is very light compared with the typical<br />
RO pre-treatment systems. The filtration level is not high, and depending only on<br />
chemicals with biofouling is also somewhat speculative. It also remains to be seen how<br />
well the mechanical parts of the system (the WEC and the APG) will perform with the<br />
chosen pre-treatment. At least, the RO membranes will require more maintenance and<br />
41