A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto
A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto
A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9 Case study<br />
A case study will be performed in order to determine the feasibility of <strong>Aalto</strong>RO. Four<br />
different areas will be studied, each with unique wave power characteristics. From all<br />
four areas a performance curve of the WEC WaveRoller will be supplied by AW-<br />
Energy, which will serve as the basis for all further calculations. With the supplied data,<br />
a performance calculation of the entire system will be carried out. Lastly, the price of<br />
the produced water will be estimated, thus giving an estimation of the feasibility of<br />
<strong>Aalto</strong>RO.<br />
First, the general description of the calculation method will be given. Second, the<br />
presumptions and simplifications that have been made will be presented as well as some<br />
details that will be common to all four cases, e.g. the membrane type. Third, the<br />
optimum pressure level for the operation of <strong>Aalto</strong>RO will be determined. Fourth,<br />
calculations will be performed separately for each case area in order to determine the<br />
optimum configuration, the permeate production and the cost of the produced water in<br />
€/m³.<br />
9.1 Calculation method<br />
This Chapter presents the general calculation method used in determining the feasibility<br />
of <strong>Aalto</strong>RO. The calculation begins with the wave resources available on the location.<br />
The developer of WaveRoller, AW-Energy has provided performance curves of<br />
WaveRoller for each of the chosen sites. These performance curves represent the<br />
capability of WaveRoller as a pump pressurizing seawater to 65 bar pressure.<br />
From each Site there are two curves. The first gives the ratio between the nominal pump<br />
capacity of the “wave-pump” and the annual production, represented by the upper<br />
picture in Figure 34. For instance the star represents the nominal pump capacity of 0,02<br />
m³/s and the annual production of 350 000 m³ of feed water in 65 bar pressure.<br />
The second curve one is a retention curve and represents the probability of each nominal<br />
pump capacity (the lower picture of Figure 34). The annual production of 350 000 m³<br />
with a nominal pump capacity of 0,02 m³/s (the star) in the upper picture has been<br />
calculated as the area marked with grey in the lower picture. It has been presumed that<br />
with wave powers lower than the nominal pump capacity, the WaveRoller can operate<br />
without problems, but with wave powers greater than the nominal pump capacity, it will<br />
operate only with its nominal capacity (the black line in the lower picture).<br />
49