27.06.2013 Views

A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto

A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto

A Feasibility Study - Aaltodoc - Aalto-yliopisto

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The performance of the RO membranes depends upon numerous factors, including the<br />

total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration, membrane material and thickness as well as<br />

the feed pressure, feed flow rate and feed temperature. In a standard RO system the<br />

operating pressure is maintained at the desired level and only start-ups and shut-downs<br />

cause significant changes in the pressure (Bergman 2007) .<br />

It has been estimated that pressure variations will cause losses in the life-time and the<br />

performance of the membranes, although the matter is still under discussion (Folley,<br />

Peñate Suarez & Whittaker 2008). With wave power being fluctuating by nature, it<br />

could cause a problem for the <strong>Aalto</strong>RO system, but the Adaptive Pressure Generator<br />

(APG) will be able to stabilize the pressure by using pressure accumulators. Thus,<br />

pressure fluctuations are not considered to be problematic for <strong>Aalto</strong>RO.<br />

The choice of various RO system components depends mainly on the desired output –<br />

its quantity and quality. For example, drinking water has strict standards, although<br />

varying between countries, which have to be met. World Health Organization does not<br />

give a strict standard for the TDS level of drinking water, instead it states that water<br />

with TDS concentrations below 1000 mg/l is acceptable (WHO 2003). The United<br />

States Environmental Protection Agency has set a secondary maximum contaminant<br />

level of 500 mg/l for TDS, which usually is the target for water treatment (Bergman<br />

2007, EPA 2012).<br />

Measuring the efficiency of the RO membranes and the overall membrane configuration<br />

is usually done by giving out certain key figures. The most important key figure is the<br />

recovery rate, usually denoted with R. It explains how much of the incoming feed water<br />

is transformed into product water. Typically the recovery rate will be kept at the highest<br />

possible value taking into account the desired water quality, fouling of the membranes<br />

and the capital and maintenance costs (Bergman 2007). The membrane system<br />

performance is measured by the membrane salt rejection capability, which can be as<br />

high as 99,7 % (Greenlee et al. 2009).<br />

Depending on the desired output, the input flow rate velocity, required maintenance<br />

schedule and various factors depending on the project in question, the decision of the<br />

suitable design configuration is made. It can be a single pass, dual-pass or any other<br />

configuration. Still, some key design principles should be thought of. First, the RO<br />

system has a minimum energy requirement when the recovery is between 50 – 55 %.<br />

Second, maximum recovery is achieved when only one pass system is used (Greenlee et<br />

al. 2009). Third, novel practices and membranes can improve the efficiency and lifetime<br />

of the membranes thus resulting in significant savings (Peñate, García-Rodríguez 2012).<br />

Therefore, the choice of the design configuration should be made only after a careful<br />

consideration (Kucera 2010). <strong>Aalto</strong>RO will utilize a single pass system, as it is typical<br />

in small seawater reverse osmosis systems (DOW 2010).<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!