View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Control of material flow – The lead screw which pushed the material from the<br />
top of the deposition head at times would not be good enough to maintain a<br />
continuous deposition. To overcome this, the lead screw was rotated at times<br />
with hand to ensure that material was always being deposited when the<br />
Fab@home software was running.<br />
The Fab@home software would refuse to connect to hardware at times for no<br />
reason. Repetitive trials of plug and play would set this right.<br />
When the Fab@home software was paused in the middle of a deposition, and<br />
then restarted back on again it would at times go to the wrong location and<br />
not start from the place it was paused at.<br />
When changing to print between different models / different conditions,<br />
Fab@homeat times would go to print at a wrong location on the machine. To<br />
avoid this, software was closed and started back on again to avoid any wrong<br />
printing.<br />
In spite of all these difficulties, all parts are printed as per the design specifications,<br />
however, with some minor errors in some of the parts. One set of parts printed to the<br />
specifications in Table 4.1 are shown in Fig. 4.1. Some disturbance and discontinuity<br />
of fibres may be evident in a couple of the samples. Otherwise, the specimen parts<br />
have some distortions on the sides due to the spreading of the polymer under its<br />
own weight. For this reason, the samples are polished on the side faces, after<br />
sufficient curing and the finished samples of flat and curved layer specimens are<br />
shown in Fig. 4.2.<br />
4.7 Results and discussion<br />
The specimens are then subjected to 3-point bending tests on the Hounsfield tensile<br />
testing equipment in materials testing lab of AUT University. A typical specimen<br />
under 3-point loading is shown in Fig. 4.3. The maxim compressive force before<br />
fracture of is recorded in the case of each sample, and the final data obtained for all<br />
samples is presented in Table 4.2. All the test samples are cured for about 48 hours<br />
in this case. It was observed that curing time is a critical factor in the case of<br />
fabepoxy, and the more the curing time, the better the part strength.<br />
95