30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Control of material flow – The lead screw which pushed the material from the<br />

top of the deposition head at times would not be good enough to maintain a<br />

continuous deposition. To overcome this, the lead screw was rotated at times<br />

with hand to ensure that material was always being deposited when the<br />

Fab@home software was running.<br />

The Fab@home software would refuse to connect to hardware at times for no<br />

reason. Repetitive trials of plug and play would set this right.<br />

When the Fab@home software was paused in the middle of a deposition, and<br />

then restarted back on again it would at times go to the wrong location and<br />

not start from the place it was paused at.<br />

When changing to print between different models / different conditions,<br />

Fab@homeat times would go to print at a wrong location on the machine. To<br />

avoid this, software was closed and started back on again to avoid any wrong<br />

printing.<br />

In spite of all these difficulties, all parts are printed as per the design specifications,<br />

however, with some minor errors in some of the parts. One set of parts printed to the<br />

specifications in Table 4.1 are shown in Fig. 4.1. Some disturbance and discontinuity<br />

of fibres may be evident in a couple of the samples. Otherwise, the specimen parts<br />

have some distortions on the sides due to the spreading of the polymer under its<br />

own weight. For this reason, the samples are polished on the side faces, after<br />

sufficient curing and the finished samples of flat and curved layer specimens are<br />

shown in Fig. 4.2.<br />

4.7 Results and discussion<br />

The specimens are then subjected to 3-point bending tests on the Hounsfield tensile<br />

testing equipment in materials testing lab of AUT University. A typical specimen<br />

under 3-point loading is shown in Fig. 4.3. The maxim compressive force before<br />

fracture of is recorded in the case of each sample, and the final data obtained for all<br />

samples is presented in Table 4.2. All the test samples are cured for about 48 hours<br />

in this case. It was observed that curing time is a critical factor in the case of<br />

fabepoxy, and the more the curing time, the better the part strength.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!