CONTENTS - ouroboros ponderosa

,(0)) ,. T,lylm, op. ("if., p. J..IK.
'
53. Henry I; " May 'IhI ' . F . Il( I U if /11I(,I"Wall I
J"I/(J(:('llt'r (Nt'\\' YOlk , liJVi) . , p . . 114 - .
. ;
5 4. Grnham Adams lr "' Th,. ' A g{ ()) .rj f1(I us!naI Vio{[,!lC/', jl)j() Nl'i(Ncw York J9(()
· 5" j. IbI 'd 'J p. 219.
56. Christopher Lasch, Tltr. Ne.w Radicalism in Amnica ' 1889-1963(Ncw York, It)(l.'I ),
pp. 202-203.
57. Jacques Ellul ' The - T, Poe hno ioglca ' IS OClcty · (New York ' 19(7) , pp . . 365 - -. 36' ) \J .
_
::,8. Zeman, or.cit., p. 162.
' "
> • , • 222.
.
' )), p. II
59. John Highm, Strangers in fhe Land (New York, 19(8) ,P ,
60. Ha!e, up. elf., p. 163.
195.
61, Ibid" p, 153
62. Rc ,gcr Shattuck, The Banqun Ye an (New York, 19(7) ' p . 28 3.
.
63. /bul., p. 279.
64. !"larr:r Golumbek, The. Game a/ Chess (london 19)4) p
65. ZweIg, op. (:il., p. 195.
G6. R.W. Flint, ed. Marinerti (New York, 1972), P . 14.
67 Shauuck, op. cit., p. 353.
68 Discussed by Carolyn E . PI ayne, Th I" M!umses of Nations (London ' 1925) , p . 49 .
.
69' , P auI
R' lCotUr, Hwory and Truth (Evanston 1%5) p 213
.
70 ' DavId . . La n d es, 'rl 1 ,le lfnhound Prome!heus
(Lon on " 1969) , p . 316 .
. .
d
71 Siegfried ("ar II ' Ion, M ec h amzullOn Takes Command (New Y rk " 1969) p. 41 .
o
72· . Hilton ' Kramer ' "German Ex , pressloillsm, " " .san . Francisco T'.Xaminer-Chronicle7 October 12,
1980.
73. Berghahn, op . cit., p. 78.
74. Ibid., p. 81 ,
75. Yon Bu[ow, op. dt., p. [03.
70, Ibid,. p, 102.
77. Playne, op. cit., p. 88.
78. James Gerard Mu F }'j
. G
, J our ears In ermallY (New York > t917) , p. 75 . G erar d saw [he
popular reaction to the Zab ern mCI " d cnts as " perhaps the f' ma 1fae t or w h' Ie h decided the
.
advocates of Ihe old milita r) 's Y s(e m of Germany 10 favor of a European war" (p. 91) .
79. John T . Fl ynn, As W.
.
I" Go Marchmg (New York 1973) 81
SO. Arthur Ros nberg, impenal Ge.nnany (New YOk, 1970f p.
e: 58.
8 1. Gordn Cnllg, Gf'-rmany, 1866-1945(New . York ' 1978) , p. 337 .
.
82. D.!\. Smart ' Pannelwe.k . . an d G OTter s Mar:nsm (New York, 1977) . , p . 20 .
03 Ib'd
o . I ., p. 21.
. J
84. Austin Harrison, TJu Ka iser's War (London 1914) p 197
amcs Jail, The Second International (New York, 1956) pp. 166-167
· Robert
Looker, ed ROl'a Luxembu . . . '
,
18· S eute l d Polmeal Writings (New York, 1972), p. 40.
87. Ibid., p. 197. "
88. Ibid., p. 222.
,
89 · The 0 p. mkus, ed., Coner.sa!lolIs with Luk(ICS (Cambridge 1975) , p. 1 48.
90. Hannah Arendt, Totahrarianism (New York " 1968) p . 26' J.
91. Quoted by Arendt, Ibid.
92. Hannah Hafkesbrink ' Unknown G mnany: An inner Ch ronicle (New Haven, 1948),
pp. 30-32.
93. Reginald Pound, The ost Gme.rarion (New York 1964) p 73 .
L ' .
94. Joseph Bibby, The. War, Its Unseen Cause and S if"
95. eorge Dangerfield,
Thp. Strange Dr.ath of Liber;(d
,
L s
[:,::; L o n , 91
don
k 1 5) . .
or , 1961) p. Vlll. p
96. Eman uel Shmwcll, I've Lived Through II All (London ' 1973) ,p 12
97. R.C.K. Enor, England, 1870-1914 (Ox[ord, 1936), p. SS7. . .
.
12
I·" , ·.MI ·NI:-' III· 1< 1+1 /\,\1
'JK, ILL I '\'.111'. /I,.' ! 'It'lm;(01 /l,!W (I Hudon, 19)0), p. 46.
1)'1. ('oliu ('IOSS , 'lJ1I· I.iI}('ral.\· in Power, 1905-1914 (London, 1(63), p. 171.
lOll. James {:'1Itll.:ron, 1':)i4 (New York, 1959), p. 21.
101. Harold Nicolson, King Geo'1:e the Fifth (London, 1952), p . 163.
102. Arthur Marwick, The Deluge: British Socir.ty and lhe First WorM War (Roston, 19(6),
p, 10,
103. William Archer, The Great Analysis (London, 1911), p. 19.
104, Zan S. Steiner, Britain and the On'gins of the. First World War (New York, 1977), p. 153.
lOS. Elie Halev)', A History of the. £fl8li.h People, 1905-1915(London, 1934), p. 457.
106. Ibid., p. 436.
107. Ibid., pp. 446,45 1.
109. Elie Halevy, The Era of Tyrannie' (Garden City, N.Y., 1965), p. 106,
109. G. A. Phillips.. "The Triple Industrial Alliance in 1914," Economic History Rf':vit'w,
XXIV J (1971), p, 63,
110. Camcron, op. cit., p. 46.
111. V.i. Pound, op. Cil., p. 28.
12. Quoted in Eric J. Leed's "Class and Disillusionment in World War I," Journal of
1
Modf.m iILI·tOry, so (December 1978), p. 691.
Taylorism and Unionism
1. David Jenkins, lob Power: Blur. and White Collar Democracy (Baltimore, 1974), p. 9.
2. Department o[ Health, r:d ucation and Welfare, Work in America (Cambridge, Mass.,
1973). p, 19,
3. Frederick W. Taylor, Principles of SCientific Ml1nagemt'fli (New York, 19l1), p. 32.
4. Siegfried Giedion. Mechanization Takes Command (New York, 1945), p. 38. C. Bertrand
'Thompson made the same point in 1917 when he pointed out the absence of compeli­
tive pressure behind firms employing scientific management, "for the reason that most
of them now using it stand in a quasi-monopoly position in which there is no neces:>ity
to reduce their prices .... "] See hi!; The. Theory and Prar::lice of SCientific Management
(Bostoll, 1917), pp, 88-89,
5. Mary Follett of the Taylor Society, for example, claimed that with scientific management,
"authority is derived from function" and thus "has little to do with hierarchy of position
as such .... " {Sec Taylor Society, H.S. Person, Editor, Scie.ntific Manage.ment in Amoican
Induslry (New York, 1929), p. 436] Typical pronouncements claimed that it embodied
"a new kind of authority which stemmed [rom the unveiling of scientific law," lSee
Samuel Haber, l:.Jflci(lU:Y and Up lifl (Chicago, 1964), p. 25] and that it substituted joint
obedience o[ employers and workers "to fact and law for obedience to personal
authority." [See Robcrt Franklin Hoxie, Scimlific Management and Labor (New York,
1915), p. 9.] The time-study man, measuring, and manipulating the worker wi th his
stopwatCh, relies on "unimpeachable data." {Horace D Drury, Scimrific Manageme.nt
(New York, 1915), p. 59.J
6. Taylor Socicty, op. cit, p. 46.
7. Taylor, Prineiplr.s, op. cit., p. 59. RL. GoOU, one of Taylor's leading disciples, spoke of
implementing the task system as "the standard method of teaching and training,
chi[dren." lSec his Wagl's tJ.nd Profits (New York, 1919), p. 122.} Since "the worker
became an object in Taylor's hands," in Jacques Ellul's phrase, it follows easily that he
would be seen as an animal or a child by the Tayloritcs, Another part of the justifica­
tion was Taylor's notion of the "economic man," that a worker's real motivation is
money and nothing else. !See Sudhir Kakar, Frede.rick Taylor: A Study in P(>onality and
lnnovation (Cambridge, Muss., J970) p. 99.J