13.07.2013 Views

CONTENTS - ouroboros ponderosa

CONTENTS - ouroboros ponderosa

CONTENTS - ouroboros ponderosa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J\dS "( )jN-.- f,, · AMI·',U·r\N INIII I"> 'IO:\l ISM<br />

in August IK2X Kensington's hand 100111 weavers alillOUllccd a JHllidIY<br />

from their daily toil. News of the affair circulateo throughout thl' distrirt<br />

and by mid-afternoon the hard-living frame tenders and their eOlnrad,'"<br />

turned the neighborhood avenues into a playground. Knots of loungill :<br />

workers joked and exchanged gossip .... The more athletic challenged onl'<br />

another to foot races and games ... (and) quenched their thirst wilh<br />

frequent drams. The spree was a classic celebration of St. Monday,"'"<br />

It was no accident that mass production-primarily textile factories<br />

first appeared in New England, with its relative lack of strong craft<br />

traditions, rather than in say, Philadelphia, the center of American<br />

artisan skills ." Traditions of indepenoent creativity ohviously posed an<br />

obstacle to manufacturing innovation, causing Carl Russell Fish to assay<br />

that "craftsmen were the only actively dissatisfied class in the country.""<br />

The orthodox explanation of industrialism's triumph stresses the much<br />

higher U.S. wage levels, compared to Europe, and an alleged shortage<br />

of skilled workers. These are, as a rule , considered the primary factors<br />

that produced "an environment affording every suggestion and induce­<br />

ment to substitute machinery for men," and that nurtured that "inven­<br />

tiveness and mcchanical intuition which are sometimes regarded as a<br />

national trait," in the descriptive phrases of Clark."<br />

But the preceding dicusion should already be enough to indicate that<br />

it wa the presence of work kills that challenged the new technology; not<br />

their absence. Research shows no dearth of killed workers,26 and there<br />

is abundant evidence that "the trend toward mechanization came more<br />

from cultural and managerial bias than from carefully calculated marginal<br />

costs.,m<br />

Habakkuk's comparison of American and British antebellum technolo­<br />

gy and labor economics cites the "scarcity and belligerency of the<br />

available skilled labour"'" and we must accent the latter quality, while<br />

realizing that scarcity can also mean the ability to make oneself scarce­<br />

namely, the oft-remarked high turnover rate.29<br />

It was industrial discipline that was missing, especially among crafts­<br />

men. At mid-century Samuel Colt confided to a British engineering<br />

group that "uneducated laborers" made the bet worker in his new<br />

mass-production arms factory becaue they had so little to unlearn;lO<br />

skills-and the rccalcitrance accompanying them-wcre hardly at a<br />

premium.<br />

Strikes and unionization (though ccrtainly not always linked) became<br />

common from 1823 forward," and the modern labor movement showed<br />

particular vitality during the militant "great uprising" period of 1833-<br />

1837 -"<br />

I II·MI'NI:-. fll 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!