PDF (Thesis) - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham
PDF (Thesis) - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham
PDF (Thesis) - Nottingham eTheses - University of Nottingham
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 6: SIMULATIONS OF INPUT AND OUTPUT SYSTEM EMI<br />
V[dBµV]<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
−20<br />
Simulation<br />
Measurement<br />
1 10<br />
Frequency [MHz]<br />
Figure 6.3: Output Vab simulation/measurement comparison<br />
voltage and current have been measured (Fig. 6.4 shows the measurements on phase<br />
a). Applying the FFT operator to the sampled values measured with a scope (WavePro<br />
715Zi sampling 500ms at 500kHz), the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the fundamental frequency with<br />
its phase has been obtained. The model’s R/L parameters can be obtained from the<br />
measured amplitudes:<br />
RL = |V|<br />
|I| · cos(φV − φI) (6.4.1)<br />
XL = |V|<br />
|I| · sin(φV − φI) (6.4.2)<br />
In order to double check the phase <strong>of</strong>fset between the two current and voltage signals,<br />
the cross-correlation operator has been used. This operator is proportional to the over-<br />
lapping between the two signals and, for real values, it is expressed by the formula<br />
6.4.3.<br />
c(m) =<br />
N−m−1<br />
∑ xn+myn,<br />
n=0<br />
m = −2N+ 1 . . . 2N− 1 (6.4.3)<br />
The output is a vector as long as the sum <strong>of</strong> the lengths <strong>of</strong> the two input signals, voltage<br />
and current in this case, and its peaks are located when the two signal match the most.<br />
Since both voltage and current are sine waves, the peaks will be periodic, and peak<br />
when the two signals are exactly in phase; this can be seen in Fig. 6.5. At the positive<br />
peak the overlapping is at the maximum, so to obtain the phase <strong>of</strong>fset the time shift<br />
m must simply be divided by the periodicity <strong>of</strong> the signal and multiplied by 2π. The<br />
values obtained with both methods are compared and contrasted in Table 6.1, where<br />
we can observe the reliability <strong>of</strong> the measurements.<br />
75