31.07.2013 Views

Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability

Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability

Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 4.2: Overview of separate analyses<br />

Analysis Description Sample<br />

1. Total category sales analysis Total<br />

2. Decomposition: Former category buyers delisted<br />

items – former category buyers nondelisted items<br />

101<br />

Category buyers before assortment<br />

reduction (former buyers)<br />

3. Decomposition: Sales of new buyers New category buyers after<br />

4.4.3 Econometric modeling<br />

assortment reduction<br />

To estimate the effect of the assortment reduction on the category sales in the test s<strong>to</strong>res, we<br />

specify an econometric model in terms of the log category sales of specific sets of households.<br />

Thus, the parameters should be interpreted as relative effects; that is, they represent percentage<br />

changes. An advantage of such a specification is that sales of populations of different sizes can<br />

be compared easily. For ease of exposition, we start by specifying the model for the comparison<br />

of the <strong>to</strong>tal category sales across the four s<strong>to</strong>res. For this case, the model can be presented<br />

compactly as follows:<br />

] { f ( t | γ ) + g(<br />

t | θ ) } + ε 1,<br />

3 ( test s<strong>to</strong>res)<br />

] { f ( t | γ ) } + ε 2,<br />

4 ( control s<strong>to</strong>res),<br />

log = α + β ' x + I[<br />

t ≥ T1<br />

i =<br />

(2a)<br />

Sit i it<br />

it<br />

log = α + β ' x + I[<br />

t ≥ T1<br />

i =<br />

(2b)<br />

Sit i it<br />

it<br />

where Sit denotes the sales for s<strong>to</strong>re i = 1,2,3,4 at time t = 1, …, T; xit denotes a vec<strong>to</strong>r of<br />

explana<strong>to</strong>ry variables, such as promotion dummies or dummies for aberrant observations; I[t ≥<br />

T1] denotes an indica<strong>to</strong>r function that equals 0 before the time of delisting (T1) and 1 after the<br />

delisting; and f(t|γ) and g(t|θ) denote flexible functions of the time index that measure the change<br />

in category sales in the period after the delisting. These functions depend on unknown<br />

parameters γ and θ. In this specification, we explicitly use the control s<strong>to</strong>res <strong>to</strong> identify the effect<br />

of the delisting. The function f(t|γ) gives the baseline changes in category sales in all s<strong>to</strong>res,<br />

irrespective of the delisting, whereas g(t|θ) gives the (additional) change in the test s<strong>to</strong>res due <strong>to</strong><br />

the assortment reduction. Note that these functions capture everything that is different after the<br />

delisting versus prior <strong>to</strong> the delisting. They are therefore not specified for t < T1. We estimate the<br />

model based on the entire sample (t = 1, …, T), so the estimates of f() and g() depend on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!