Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability
Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability
Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
interaction effects between assortment structure and brand equity and between assortment<br />
structure and (relative) assortment size. To do so, we estimate an additional model in which we<br />
add the following interaction terms <strong>to</strong> Equation 1: STRi,p,r × BEi,b and STRi,p,r × ASi,p,r.<br />
We measure SSI on a single five-point scale. Because this scale should be considered an<br />
ordinal scale, we use an ordered probit model instead of the standard linear regression model <strong>to</strong><br />
estimate Equation 1 (Long 1997). In an ordered probit model, the observed response variable is<br />
modeled on an underlying continuous variable yi * , which depends linearly on explana<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
variables. We estimate the model with maximum likelihood in E-Views 4.0. To estimate the<br />
effect of our explana<strong>to</strong>ry variables on assortment satisfaction and complaining behavior, we use<br />
a standard linear regression model with ordinary least squares, because the summation of the<br />
three CIs can be considered an interval scale.<br />
Prior <strong>to</strong> estimating the model for Equation 1, we assess whether multicollinearity might<br />
cause severe problems in our data by considering the correlation among the independent<br />
variables (see Table 3.4). In general, the correlation among the independent variables is low. We<br />
also compute the variance inflation fac<strong>to</strong>rs and find that all are less than 2. Therefore, we<br />
conclude that multicollinearity will not affect our estimation results (Hair et al. 1998; Leeflang et<br />
al. 2000). We use White’s (1980) method <strong>to</strong> correct for potential heteroscedasticity in the errors<br />
and variables.<br />
82