31.07.2013 Views

Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability

Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability

Understanding Consumer Reactions to Assortment Unavailability

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3.3 The interaction of hedonic level and brand equity on OOS reactions<br />

Two main rationales exist for a moderating effect of the hedonic level of a product on the effect<br />

of brand equity in OOS reactions. First, hedonic products offer more opportunities <strong>to</strong><br />

differentiate the brand in consumers’ minds than do utilitarian products (Keller 2002; Rossiter<br />

and Percy 1997). In utilitarian product groups, brands mainly are differentiated by product<br />

quality. In hedonic product groups, however, emotional and symbolic aspects play an important<br />

role in positioning the brand. Strong hedonic brands, such as Coca-Cola, Budweiser, and<br />

Marlboro, have built dominant and relevant association networks in many consumers’ minds.<br />

Due <strong>to</strong> the stronger position of high-equity brands in hedonic product categories, the effect of<br />

brand equity on brand or s<strong>to</strong>re switching should be greater in hedonic categories than in<br />

utilitarian categories.<br />

Second, high-equity brands in hedonic categories usually provide more items on the shelf<br />

relative <strong>to</strong> high-equity brands in utilitarian categories. For example, in a utilitarian category like<br />

milk, there are only a few items for the leading brand, whereas consumers may choose among<br />

many sizes and flavors (e.g., regular, vanilla, cherry) of leading brands in a hedonic product<br />

group like cola. This provides the consumer with more switching alternatives of the same brand,<br />

which may lead <strong>to</strong> increased item switching. In addition, consumers have a greater need for<br />

variety in hedonic categories than in utilitarian categories (Van Trijp, Hoyer, and Inman 1996)<br />

and therefore may be more willing <strong>to</strong> switch <strong>to</strong> another size or flavor. Thus, the probability that<br />

consumers will switch items is higher for high-equity brands in hedonic product groups than for<br />

high-equity brands in utilitarian product groups. In the same fashion, the greater availability of<br />

items of the same brand leads <strong>to</strong> less postponement for high-equity brands in hedonic product<br />

groups than for high-equity brands in utilitarian product groups.<br />

H3a: The hedonic level of a product group increases the negative effect of brand equity on the<br />

probability of brand switching.<br />

H3b: The hedonic level of a product group increases the positive effect of brand equity on the<br />

probability of s<strong>to</strong>re switching.<br />

H3c: The hedonic level of a product group increases the positive effect of brand equity on the<br />

probability of item switching.<br />

H3d: The hedonic level of a product group decreases the positive effect of brand equity on the<br />

probability of postponing.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!