Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>UK</strong> FILM COUNCIL<br />
hard to quantify in precise terms, and may be exaggerated by <strong>the</strong> fact that we are comparing with only <strong>the</strong> top mainstream titles <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
year.<br />
Title by title comparisons<br />
Theatrical<br />
One valuable metric <strong>for</strong> quantifying <strong>the</strong> relative per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> films through different windows is to simply compare<br />
<strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people who consumed individual titles through window A with <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> people who consumed <strong>the</strong>m through window<br />
B. This can be shown as a simple ratio A/B. So if five times as many people saw a film at <strong>the</strong> cinema than bought it at <strong>the</strong> DVD store,<br />
<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> simple ratio <strong>of</strong> retail to <strong>the</strong>atrical consumption is 20 per cent.<br />
For this analysis we have ignored <strong>the</strong> vast majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>UK</strong> and specialised film releases and concentrated only on <strong>the</strong> top 25 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
releases in each <strong>of</strong> 2003 and 2004 (50 films in total). Not only does this substantially remove <strong>the</strong> bias that we had <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> comparative<br />
mainstream films towards <strong>the</strong> top end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> market only, but it also<br />
10%<br />
8%<br />
6%<br />
4%<br />
2%<br />
0%<br />
Ratio <strong>of</strong> online rentals to cinema admissions <strong>for</strong> films<br />
released in 2003 and 2004<br />
removes a whole raft <strong>of</strong> films from <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong><br />
numbers were so low in certain windows that <strong>the</strong> ratios with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
windows became meaninglessly large.<br />
Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bars in <strong>the</strong> chart on <strong>the</strong> left represents one release, <strong>the</strong><br />
darker bars represent <strong>the</strong> top <strong>UK</strong> and specialised films from 2003 and<br />
2004, and <strong>the</strong> lighter bars represent <strong>the</strong> top mainstream titles.<br />
The chart shows that a handful <strong>of</strong> top <strong>UK</strong> and specialised films<br />
generated online rental transactions that numbered at least a tenth <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> admissions that <strong>the</strong>y attracted in <strong>the</strong> cinemas. For <strong>the</strong>se films,<br />
<strong>the</strong> audience was increased by at least 10 per cent on <strong>the</strong>atrical as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> online rental release. One film attracted 22 per cent <strong>the</strong><br />
number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>atrical admissions in <strong>the</strong> online space.<br />
About a fifth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> and specialised films attracted transactions<br />
that numbered at least five per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir cinema admissions<br />
<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>Plat<strong>for</strong>m</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>UK</strong> films and Specialised films to <strong>the</strong> Home<br />
<strong>UK</strong> Film Council © 2006<br />
19