01.08.2013 Views

Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI

Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI

Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>UK</strong> FILM COUNCIL<br />

Third, <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> ‘independent’ and ‘specialised’ must be construed as widely as possible, not only to encompass all <strong>UK</strong> independent<br />

rights holders, but also to give <strong>the</strong> service a commercial edge by <strong>of</strong>fering better known titles to drive traffic. This view was supported<br />

significantly by <strong>the</strong> bigger labels, such as Entertainment, Pa<strong>the</strong> and Tartan. However, in contrast, <strong>the</strong> smaller labels interviewed raised<br />

<strong>the</strong> concern that a wider definition <strong>of</strong> studio titles would lead to <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> too many major studio titles at <strong>the</strong> expense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> smaller<br />

independents. The concern seemed to appear from <strong>the</strong> definitions used in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Digital</strong> Screen Network and <strong>the</strong> anecdotal practices adopted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> cinemas with digital projectors favouring better-known titles such as ‘Sideways’ to drive audiences.<br />

In reality, this is unlikely to be an issue in an on-demand environment (and even less so over <strong>the</strong> Internet) given that <strong>the</strong>re is almost no<br />

limitation on ‘shelf-space’. Moreover, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> independent and specialised films lists <strong>for</strong> 2003 and 2004, only 36 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 521 total titles<br />

were released by <strong>the</strong> Hollywood studios --- equivalent to 7 per cent <strong>of</strong> all releases. However, <strong>the</strong> studio titles accounted <strong>for</strong> 12 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

all <strong>the</strong>atrical revenues from specialised films in <strong>the</strong> two years combined (most <strong>of</strong> which was generated in 2003 when <strong>the</strong> studio share <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> independent and specialised market revenue was almost 20 per cent from 8 per cent <strong>of</strong> releases).<br />

A greater concern from almost every single rights holder interviewed seemed to be that a plat<strong>for</strong>m was needed to support <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> film<br />

industry. That is, <strong>the</strong>re needs to be a greater emphasis on a ‘<strong>UK</strong> independent film’ plat<strong>for</strong>m than just a ‘specialised film’ plat<strong>for</strong>m. The<br />

prospect <strong>of</strong> a somewhat guaranteed distribution mechanism in one window and showcasing on a dedicated plat<strong>for</strong>m/channel --- whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

being <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>for</strong> on-demand rental or digital sell-through over <strong>the</strong> Internet --- seems to be considered an opportunity to increase <strong>the</strong><br />

commercial viability <strong>of</strong> some content (and as such to a relative degree to drive investment).<br />

<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>Plat<strong>for</strong>m</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>UK</strong> films and Specialised films to <strong>the</strong> Home<br />

<strong>UK</strong> Film Council © 2006<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!