Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>UK</strong> FILM COUNCIL<br />
importantly, it would mean that such rights on 173 titles released in 2003 are still unexploited and still in <strong>the</strong> possession <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original<br />
filmmakers.<br />
To clear up this issue, <strong>the</strong>re seems to be a need <strong>for</strong> some kind <strong>of</strong> retrospective negotiating with <strong>the</strong> original rights holders (<strong>the</strong><br />
filmmakers) and a reopening <strong>of</strong> contracts on many library titles. The message from some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> distributors interviewed was that in many<br />
cases sales agents are starting to realise <strong>the</strong> potential value <strong>of</strong> Internet rights and are minded to advise filmmakers to ‘stockpile’ rights in<br />
an ef<strong>for</strong>t to hedge bets on future successful services appearing.<br />
Interestingly, this strategy does not appear to be restricted to just sales agents alone. <strong>UK</strong> distributors seem to be viewing exploitation <strong>of</strong><br />
Internet rights in a very similar way --- taking advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ambiguity surrounding Internet business models to await <strong>the</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> services. One such service is BSkyB’s Sky Movies Broadband plat<strong>for</strong>m, <strong>for</strong> which <strong>the</strong> satellite operator is now actively<br />
acquiring rights <strong>for</strong> Internet distribution in <strong>the</strong> pay-TV window alongside its existing TV rights. According to studio sources, as well as<br />
some leading independents such as Artificial Eye, BSkyB is now implementing new deals to take into account <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Internet<br />
(although some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studio deals are simply being extended and construed to include Internet rights also). BSkyB is also seeking to<br />
extend <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> its PPV rights deals in <strong>the</strong> same vein.<br />
What this does not change, however, is <strong>the</strong> largely untapped base <strong>of</strong> Internet VoD rights held by <strong>the</strong> original filmmakers in <strong>the</strong><br />
independent sector. Not only is BSkyB unlikely to change its cherry-picking approach, it also does not deal with filmmakers directly (at<br />
least not yet). As such, anything <strong>the</strong> distributors do not hold <strong>the</strong> rights to, <strong>the</strong>n nei<strong>the</strong>r will, by definition, BSkyB. This in many ways<br />
creates a gap in <strong>the</strong> market. There seems to be a clear need <strong>for</strong> an on-demand aggregator <strong>of</strong> Internet rights, dealing directly with<br />
filmmakers (or through <strong>the</strong>ir sales agents), on many library titles picked up by distributors already <strong>for</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>r media, as well as titles<br />
that cannot find a distributor in <strong>the</strong> first place.<br />
The issue <strong>of</strong> Internet rights is fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated by <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> films <strong>the</strong>mselves --- which highlight <strong>the</strong> vagaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
independent film sector overall. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> one high pr<strong>of</strong>ile title, archive news footage was used in <strong>the</strong> background <strong>of</strong> a scene, <strong>for</strong><br />
which <strong>the</strong> rights holder was a major US broadcasting network. According to <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> distributor, <strong>the</strong> producers did not initially clear <strong>the</strong><br />
footage rights with <strong>the</strong> network because <strong>of</strong> time and financial restraints. When <strong>the</strong> distributor subsequently returned to <strong>the</strong> network to<br />
retrospectively clear <strong>the</strong> rights, <strong>the</strong>y were refused because <strong>the</strong> network has a blanket policy <strong>of</strong> controlling Internet rights to all <strong>of</strong> its<br />
content worldwide. It is suspected this may not be an unusual occurrence where independent filmmaking is concerned. What is apparent<br />
however is that a greater level <strong>of</strong> clarification is urgently needed into <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> Internet rights in <strong>the</strong> independent sector.<br />
<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>Plat<strong>for</strong>m</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>UK</strong> films and Specialised films to <strong>the</strong> Home<br />
<strong>UK</strong> Film Council © 2006<br />
28