01.08.2013 Views

Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI

Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI

Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>UK</strong> FILM COUNCIL<br />

Based on a library <strong>of</strong> 500 films, <strong>the</strong> costs associated with creating digital masters suitably tagged and stored centrally would be £60,000<br />

<strong>for</strong> initial creation <strong>of</strong> masters, tagging and encoding. On-going annual storage costs would be in <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> £25,000.<br />

Enable marketing support (“digital P&A”) <strong>for</strong> on-demand distribution<br />

In <strong>the</strong> traditional film outlets, independent and specialised products require as much marketing support as possible to bring <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong><br />

attention <strong>of</strong> potential viewers in a crowded and ‘noisy’ marketplace. This is just as important in <strong>the</strong> digital space. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strengths <strong>of</strong><br />

on-demand plat<strong>for</strong>ms is <strong>the</strong>ir flexible virtual ‘shelf-space’ that could allow a wider choice <strong>of</strong> content to be available. The corollary <strong>of</strong> this is<br />

that it can potentially be difficult <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer to find more specialised product when <strong>the</strong>re is a large number <strong>of</strong> titles on <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

Moreover, harsh business realities dictate that plat<strong>for</strong>m owners will generally still promote and ‘push’ mainstream films perceived to have<br />

<strong>the</strong> strongest commercial appeal and will have little incentive to advertise <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> more niche <strong>of</strong>ferings. Promotion in this<br />

context can mean anything from marketing materials included with a cable operator’s monthly bill to electronic measures that highlight<br />

particular titles within a TV electronic programme guide (EPG) or on <strong>the</strong> home page <strong>of</strong> a particular website.<br />

The point here is that it is not enough to simply make specialised films available on digital plat<strong>for</strong>ms; it is just as important to let people<br />

know <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong>re. The concept <strong>of</strong> “digital P&A” could encompass both a ‘digital print’, in <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> a digital master (as discussed<br />

above), as well as a marketing support element. This latter component could be used, <strong>for</strong> example, to buy favourable positioning within<br />

an EPG or to buy a strong ranking within particular Internet search engine results.<br />

Indicative costs<br />

Based on Web promotion <strong>of</strong> 500 titles, <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> digital P&A would be around £3.7m. If creation <strong>of</strong> digital masters was included, this<br />

would add an additional £10,000 <strong>for</strong> 500 titles.<br />

Partner with one or a restricted number <strong>of</strong> distribution partners with access to a plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> ways in which <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>FC could partner an existing <strong>UK</strong> distribution plat<strong>for</strong>m. One plat<strong>for</strong>m or a restricted number <strong>of</strong><br />

plat<strong>for</strong>ms could be charged with distributing a quota <strong>of</strong> independent <strong>UK</strong> and specialised films (perhaps on a franchise basis). The potential<br />

advantages <strong>of</strong> this approach include <strong>the</strong> relative simplicity <strong>of</strong> dealing with one or a small number <strong>of</strong> players and <strong>the</strong> fact that a specially<br />

chosen partner could be expected to put more ef<strong>for</strong>t into promoting <strong>the</strong> content in return <strong>for</strong> having some kind <strong>of</strong> exclusivity. The<br />

downside <strong>of</strong> this option is that a limited partnership <strong>of</strong> this kind is unlikely to achieve <strong>the</strong> strategic objective <strong>of</strong> maximising exposure <strong>for</strong><br />

specialised films.<br />

<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>Plat<strong>for</strong>m</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>UK</strong> films and Specialised films to <strong>the</strong> Home<br />

<strong>UK</strong> Film Council © 2006<br />

98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!