Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>UK</strong> FILM COUNCIL<br />
Although CinemaNow has not <strong>of</strong>fered a white label service to date, it has carried out co-branding packages <strong>for</strong> companies such as MSN<br />
and AOL. Its primary proposal would be to <strong>of</strong>fer something such as this <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> Film Council. However, <strong>the</strong> company not only sees <strong>the</strong><br />
value <strong>of</strong> independent and specialised content (as evidenced in its deal with <strong>the</strong> Sundance Channel), it would be prepared to <strong>of</strong>fer a white<br />
label service to this end. But a total white label service might require up front and back end fee, whereas a semi-branded service would<br />
reduce <strong>the</strong> fee, possibly eliminating up front charges. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> company has gone to great pains to assert that it believes that its<br />
online plat<strong>for</strong>m grants specialised film content exposure that it would likely not receive through traditional distribution channels.<br />
One drawback <strong>of</strong> CinemaNow is <strong>the</strong> Micros<strong>of</strong>t factor and whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> Film Council would be prepared, politically, to irrevocably tie <strong>the</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> an independent film plat<strong>for</strong>m with <strong>the</strong> technology and strategies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US s<strong>of</strong>tware giant.<br />
World Cinema Online<br />
On Demand Offering<br />
Independent production company Transmission Films has been in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> testing and establishing an open Internet digital<br />
download service called World Cinema Online, dealing exclusively in independent content. With <strong>the</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong> <strong>UK</strong> producer Nick<br />
O’Hagan as head <strong>of</strong> Business Development, <strong>the</strong> service is seeking to deliver content worldwide via an advanced peer-to-peer (p2p)<br />
network designed to keep prices low and increase <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> download by retrieving content from a pool <strong>of</strong> users simultaneously (similar<br />
in nature to <strong>the</strong> technical characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sky Movies Broadband service built by IOKO/Kontiki).<br />
The venture has received financing from NESTA, and has distribution alliances with US start-ups Akimbo (Internet-to-TV <strong>delivery</strong>) and<br />
Blinkx (Internet video search) amongst o<strong>the</strong>rs. Although none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se services nor <strong>the</strong>ir technologies have been proven, <strong>the</strong> alliances do<br />
place World Cinema Online in a small group <strong>of</strong> companies pioneering video business models over <strong>the</strong> Internet.<br />
Relaunched in November 2005, <strong>the</strong> plat<strong>for</strong>m currently <strong>of</strong>fers around 30 feature and short titles <strong>for</strong> download worldwide, charging from<br />
£1.00 <strong>for</strong> a five-day rental, and £3.99 <strong>for</strong> a download-to-own <strong>for</strong> feature films going up to £1.99 and £6.99 respectively. Like<br />
Cinemanow, World Cinema Online has chosen to adopt <strong>the</strong> sell-through model as a unique aspect <strong>of</strong> its service, and can be more liberal<br />
with its consumer proposition (such as five-days viewing time as opposed to 24 hours). The content is distributed in <strong>the</strong> Windows Media<br />
environment and DRM. Its titles are predominantly budget, but <strong>the</strong>re are notable exceptions, such as George Romero’s Night <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Living<br />
Dead and Roman Polanski’s Cul-de-Sac. The service also takes direct submissions from filmmakers through its website, on a model not<br />
dissimilar to TuneTribe.com in <strong>the</strong> music market. The website as it currently stands however frequently malfunctions and has recurring<br />
consumer issues which if not resolved will prove to be a problem.<br />
<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>Plat<strong>for</strong>m</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>UK</strong> films and Specialised films to <strong>the</strong> Home<br />
<strong>UK</strong> Film Council © 2006<br />
63