Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Feasibility Study of a Digital Platform for the delivery of UK ... - BFI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>UK</strong> FILM COUNCIL<br />
existing broadcasters, such as <strong>the</strong> BBC and Channel 4, who are not only <strong>the</strong> independent sector’s best customers, but in some cases<br />
financiers in <strong>the</strong>ir own right.<br />
Fundamentally, we believe that <strong>the</strong>re is an overall lack <strong>of</strong> clarity not only as to what rights are available <strong>for</strong> both Internet and VoD<br />
exploitation, but also as to who owns <strong>the</strong> rights (if anyone). It increasingly appears to be <strong>the</strong> case that contracts silent on Internet and<br />
VoD rights are interpreted to not include such rights within <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong>reby creating a convoluted scenario whereby an operator will have<br />
to deal with an exponentially larger number <strong>of</strong> rights holders on each and every title (rendering <strong>the</strong> whole process an expensive and<br />
time-consuming exercise).<br />
There are also fundamental questions surrounding rights granted by plat<strong>for</strong>m or window, mainly because <strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> clarity (and arguably<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> technologies) within many contracts. For example, do ‘on-demand rights’ include rights <strong>for</strong> on-demand<br />
exploitation across all possible plat<strong>for</strong>ms: walled garden TV, open gateway Internet and possibly mobile? Likewise, do cable rights include<br />
exploitation across all technologies that cable operators may choose to exploit that may include, <strong>for</strong> example, IPTV. The current<br />
approach, where contracts are differ greatly and separate rights in an arbitrary fashion, leaves much to be desired – only compounding<br />
<strong>the</strong> already prevalent chaos.<br />
Questions such as <strong>the</strong>se, as well as <strong>the</strong> overall silence on VoD and Internet rights in older contracts, have led to <strong>the</strong> confused situation in<br />
which companies and rights holders are now operating. It is also one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reasons why larger players are seeking more extensive rights<br />
in a bid to remove ambiguity. In a sense, independent rights holders and distributors can be doubly disadvantaged. They do not have <strong>the</strong><br />
same resources as larger companies to sort out murky rights issues – plus <strong>the</strong>y are under increasing economic pressure from plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />
owners and broadcasters to give up VoD/Internet rights along with <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> linear rights.<br />
We believe that any action taken to resolve <strong>the</strong>se issues will facilitate <strong>the</strong> wider distribution <strong>of</strong> specialised film in <strong>the</strong> on-demand space<br />
and discuss below a number <strong>of</strong> options as to how this might be undertaken.<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> a ‘rights portal’<br />
One relatively simple step that could be undertaken by <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> Film Council to ease <strong>the</strong> confusion surrounding rights would be to establish<br />
a ‘rights portal’ – an online business-to-business (B2B) database <strong>of</strong> rights in<strong>for</strong>mation. A number <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> shelf applications already exist<br />
<strong>for</strong> managing rights inventories. The portal could work on both a ‘push’ and a ‘pull’ basis. That is, rights holders would have <strong>the</strong><br />
opportunity to populate <strong>the</strong> database with <strong>the</strong>ir own in<strong>for</strong>mation in order to make distributors and plat<strong>for</strong>ms aware <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir content (‘push’). On <strong>the</strong> ‘pull’ side, <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>FC could facilitate <strong>the</strong> undertaking <strong>of</strong> an industry rights audit (possibly as <strong>the</strong> first step in<br />
setting up this initiative and <strong>the</strong>n on a regular basis) – see below. Such a step can be recommended on several grounds:<br />
<strong>Feasibility</strong> <strong>Study</strong> <strong>for</strong> a <strong>Digital</strong> <strong>Plat<strong>for</strong>m</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>delivery</strong> <strong>of</strong> Independent <strong>UK</strong> films and Specialised films to <strong>the</strong> Home<br />
<strong>UK</strong> Film Council © 2006<br />
91