Northern Alliance - BFI
Northern Alliance - BFI
Northern Alliance - BFI
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 11: Filmmaker career progression 2006-09 43<br />
Scheme<br />
Percentage of<br />
filmmakers<br />
making<br />
further shorts<br />
(%)<br />
Percentage<br />
of<br />
filmmakers<br />
making a<br />
feature (%)<br />
Estimated<br />
number of<br />
filmmakers 44<br />
Total cost<br />
to NCF (£)<br />
Cost per<br />
feature<br />
filmmaker<br />
(£)<br />
Cinema<br />
Extreme n/c 4% 2 249,991 124,996<br />
Completion<br />
Fund 9% 1% 1 183,823 183,823<br />
Digital<br />
Shorts 23% 2% 16 1,634,400 102,150<br />
Digital<br />
Shorts Plus /<br />
Digital<br />
Nation 28% 11% 4 180,000 45,000<br />
Although it would be much more informative to perform the above analysis over a<br />
longer period of time, the fact that we can only analyse recent data at least means<br />
that errors from double counting 45 are more likely to be limited. The timeframe also<br />
coincides with the prosecution of the New Cinema Fund‟s revised strategy.<br />
While the analysis above is constrained by the information available, it appears that<br />
the Digital Shorts Plus/Digital Nation scheme is not only effective but also, relative to<br />
the other schemes, cost-efficient.<br />
43 This table shows the career development of filmmakers (writers, directors, producers) per<br />
scheme, from 2006 to 2009, as recorded by the UK Film Council's strategic partners. Source: strategic<br />
partners questionnaire. Please note, these figures include short films that have been funded but not yet<br />
completed (particularly in the most recent year). Figures reflect activity up until May 2009.<br />
44 Estimated by multiplying the number of films by three (to allow for one writer, director and<br />
producer) and then again by the percentage given. It has not been possible to identify the actual number<br />
of writers, directors and producers who have progressed to make feature films nor to examine the trend<br />
of progression over a longer (and thereby arguably more relevant) timeframe.<br />
45 For example, double counting a Digital Shorts filmmaker who subsequently makes a Digital Shorts<br />
Plus film, and then a Cinema Extreme film.<br />
Page 32