10.08.2013 Views

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the VDI model, if MSTABLE is not specified, Fij is determined dynamically, using an initial value<br />

~ = ?/’2.The motion is governed by the rate at which one considers the flow path to become filled ~<br />

with material from the upstream cell:<br />

dFij _ KW..<br />

——<br />

clt OUti!.<br />

lJ<br />

(4-11)<br />

where K is a dimensionless acceleration factor defined below, Wij is the mass flow rate in the path,<br />

as determined from the flow equation, pa is the upstream, or donor, gas density, LJj = max( IH: -<br />

H{1,~j) is the effective filling length <strong>of</strong> the flow path, and ~j is the inertial length. Equation (4-1 1)<br />

is coupled to the momentum equation through Equation (4-10) above and is solved with the<br />

constraint O < Fij s 1. Note the value K = 1 when L’ = L would correspond to physically filling an<br />

area equal to the actual flow path area ~j over the inertial length L, and K = m corresponds to an<br />

instantaneous flow path filling, or donor, assumption. In practice, <strong>for</strong> reasons discussed below, large<br />

values <strong>of</strong> K are used to accelerate the filling. Much <strong>of</strong> the time the VDI method gives essentially the<br />

same results m a strtight<strong>for</strong>wmd donor cell approach, which corresponds to setting Fij = 1 if Wij>O<br />

and Fij = O if Wijin Equation (4-10). This occurs whenever flow in one direction has persisted<br />

<strong>for</strong> a sufficient time to cause Fij to be pinned at its maximum or minimum value. The time required<br />

<strong>for</strong> pinning to occur is clearly reduced as K is increased.<br />

As discussed above, if MSTABLE is specified, Fij is simply set equal to Yf2. This value <strong>for</strong> Fij<br />

corresponds to treating stratifications as metastable over the vertical rise spanned by the flow path, ~<br />

since Fij cannot respond to flow to provide a restoring <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>for</strong> a stable stratification or a<br />

destabilizing <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>for</strong> an unstable stratification.<br />

It should be noted that in the derivation <strong>of</strong> <strong>CONTAIN</strong> momentum equation in Table 4-2, the<br />

changeover in density within the flow path to that based on the donor cell is assumed to occur<br />

instantaneously. Thus, Equation (4-1 1) is not strictly consistent with the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

momentum equation unless K is effectively infinite. In practice, the value used <strong>for</strong> K is chosen<br />

sufficiently large (z 10) to give results close to donor cell results but not so large that the<br />

discontinuities associated with the donor cell approach result in numerical problems. The value used<br />

is<br />

K=max 1o,-<br />

[1L!.<br />

g(Atfy<br />

where AL is the flow timestep.<br />

(4-12)<br />

If Fij were in fact solved using values <strong>of</strong> K close to the “physical” value, in contradiction to the<br />

momentum equation assumption, gravity wave behavior would in general be observed in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> stable stratifications. If one views the density difference between cells as representing<br />

a sharp stratification interface, then these gravity waves would cause unphysical mixing across the<br />

Rev. O 4-24 6/30/97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!