10.08.2013 Views

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

as small pipes, cabling, etc. Impact with such structures maybe more likely to merely deflect the<br />

debris than de-entrain it and these structures may not survive impact by large amounts <strong>of</strong> debris.<br />

For compartmentalized geometries, the most important debris transport issue is <strong>of</strong>ten the fraction <strong>of</strong><br />

the debris transported to the dome (f~O..). This transport fraction is governed by the relative rate at<br />

which airborne debris is transported by gas flow to downstream cells versus the rate the debris is<br />

removed from the cell atmosphere by trapping. Hence high trapping rates in the subcompartment<br />

cells tend to reduce f~O~..The TOF/KU model, when used as suggested here, is thought to be either<br />

reasonably best-estimate or else tend toward conservatism in terms calculating fd~~..However, it iS<br />

not bounding; <strong>for</strong> example, it underestimated fdO~~by 20-40% in the Surry JET experiments. If it is<br />

thought that f~O~. is being overpredicted <strong>for</strong> the case at hand, and that this is significantly affecting<br />

the calculation, sensitivity calculations may be run with sd>1 in the subcompartments and/or with<br />

the defaults used <strong>for</strong> RHODG and./or VNOST. In the TOF/KU model, variations in the critical<br />

Kutateladze numbers <strong>for</strong> de-entrainment Nfi,~,land Nfi,~J (see Sections 6.3.6 ~d Section 14.3.2.11)<br />

may be used to assess the effects <strong>of</strong> uncertainties in the de-entrainment criteria. For any trapping<br />

model, the TRAPMUL parameter may be used to vary trapping rates in either direction by an<br />

arbitrary user-specified factor. Sensitivity calculations such as these can help determine whether<br />

loads are sensitive to debris transport and trapping uncertainties, but we cannot <strong>of</strong>fer defensible<br />

uncertainty ranges <strong>for</strong> these parameters that would be generally applicable to all problems.<br />

In the dome, debris flight paths are typically long and the TOF/KU model <strong>of</strong>ten predicts the debris<br />

will stick on fmt impact, which may not be fully realistic; hence the model maybe nonconservative<br />

if dome carryover is large. A sensitivity calculation with the critical Kutateladze number <strong>for</strong> sticking<br />

on the fmt impact (Nfi,~,l)set to a very small value can be per<strong>for</strong>med to investigate the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> this question. Alternatively, gravitational fall time trapping may be specified <strong>for</strong> the dome. These<br />

sensitivity studies may be unnecessary if fd~~~.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!