Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DCH Heat Transfer. In the model for heat transfer between airborne debris and the gas, the only nondefault parameter setting recommended is the black-body multiplier (RADGAS) for debris-gas radiation. Given the particle size, this debris-gas heat transfer model is considered to be adequate. Effects of any uncertainties in this model will be qualitatively similar to, and smaller in magnitude than, the effect of the uncertainties in particle size upon the heat transfer rates. If sensitivity calculations for particle size are carried out, additional sensitivity studies involving debris-gas heat transfer parameters are not needed. The presence of dense clouds of hot aerosols during DCH events is expected to enhance atmospheric ernissivities above what is calculated by the CONTAIN default atmospheric emissivity model; hence the standard input includes specifying an atmosphere emissivity (GASSUR) equal to 0.8 during the DCH event. In code versions prior to CONTAIN 2.0, this option is not available, but the user may specify KMX equal to -0.8 in the RAD-HEAT input block in order to obtain a similar result insofar as the DCH calculation itself is concerned. However, when this option is employed, the userspecified emissivity will be used for the entire calculation, not just during the DCH event. Hence the GASSUR option is preferred for CONTAIN 2.0. However, a sensitivity calculation for the Sequoyah plant indicated that the inappropriate use of KMX = -0.8 prior to vessel breach had very little effect upon containment pressures (-0.001 MPa). Although dense clouds of hot aerosols have been assumed to enhance emissivities in defining the standard prescription, concerns do exist that the ernissivity could actually be reduced if the aerosol clouds are so dense that the optical mean free path is less than that of the thermal boundary layer, so that structures cannot “see” the hot gas/aerosol cloud beyond the boundary layer. In this event, the standard value could prove nonconservative. Little quantitative guidance as to the possible magnitude of this effect is currently available, however. Sensitivity studies given in Reference Wi195 for the SIWAET-3 and SNLOET-11 experiments indicated that use of the default radiation treatment or using KMX=- 0.4 had at most a moderate impact on AP (S 11% enhancement). Totally eliminating atmosphere-structure radiant heat transfer enhanced AP by 32% in the SNIJIET- 11 experiment, a relatively severe event in which high atmosphere temperatures resulted in radiation being especially important. Since totally eliminating radiant transfer is clearly unrealistic, even as a bound, we believe that more realistic uncertainty estimates are provided by running sensitivity calculations with the default radiation treatment ador with ISMX = –0.4. DCH Chemistry. The user of code versions prior to CONTAIN 2.0 should take care to specify the drop diffusivity (LIQSIDE) as in Table 13-1, which will eliminate drop-side reaction rate limits through an infinite drop diffusivity. The default diffusivity in the previous code versions, 10-8m2/s, can yield strongly nonconservative results; e.g., underpredicting hydrogen production by more than a factor of two in the SNLJIET-lR and SNIJIET-3 experiments, and underpredicting zIP by -35% for SNIAET-3, in which combustion of the DCH-produced hydrogen is a major contributor to the DCH load. The default value of the reaction threshold temperature (THRESH = 273.15) is obviously unrealistically low, but is specified for the standard prescription in order to avoid spurious quenching Rev. O 13-38 6/30/97 -“
esulting from homogenizing cool aged debris with hot, fresh debris. In calculations that do not involve water, specifying a higher value (1200 K or even 1800 K) typically makes little difference because gas temperatures in locations containing substantial debris become too high to cool the debris significantly, and debris is typically either completely reacted, trapped, or both before it cools sufficiently for quenching of chemical reaction to be physically reasonable. In scenarios involving water, calculated atmospheric temperatures can be much lower, and quenching of chemical reaction can be a physically realistic possibility. This potential mitigation effect is not captured in the standard prescription because neither the reaction threshold nor an appropriate temperature-dependent drop-side diffusivity is specified. However, specification of a reaction temperature threshold and/or a temperature-dependent drop-side diffusivity can result in very nonconservative results owing to the spurious quenching effect resulting from homogenizing fresh reacting debris with cold aged debris. Hence, if these features are to be used in calculations involving water, the multigeneration feature is required to avoid the spurious quenching effect. There is little experience in using this approach and little guidance can be given; it is up to the user to ensure that any quenching of chemical reaction calculated is realistic. Non-Airborne Debris. DCH analysis has traditionally emphasized the interactions of airborne debris with blowdown steam and the containment atmosphere. However, analysis of the DCH experiments discussed in Section 13.3.2.2.1 shows that it is difficult to account for all the hydrogen produced in the experiments if interactions of non-airborne debris with blowdown steam are not also modeled. The CONTAIN model for these interactions is partially parametric and the standard prescription for its use is based partly upon empirical results and partly upon a stand-alone model for non-airborne debris interactions. We summarize here the standard prescription and suggested sensitivity studies with relatively little discussion. Analysis of the Zion IET experiments shows that calculations that included only airborne debris and neglected cavity water underpredicted hydrogen production and AP by about a factor of two. All of these experiments included at least a small amount of water in the cavity. Neither the experimental data nor the modeling were adequate to completely separate the effects of non-airborne debris and co-dispersed cavity water. In the l/10-scale Zion IET experiments, AP and hydrogen production were reproduced well assuming a trapped field diameter, ~, equal to 0.01 m if the water is ignored, or equal to 0.02 m if the water is included as described below; the results given in Figure 13-4 were calculated assuming ~~ = 0.01 m and included no water. The integral results provided no basis for choosing between these two prescriptions, but the calculated pressure-time histories agreed better with experimental results for the prescription including the water. On the other hand, the prescription with ~ = 0.01 m gave satisfactory results for other experiments in which there was no cavity water. The calculated effects of non-airborne debris were smaller for the other experiments than for the Zion IET experiments, but the effect upon hydrogen production was still significant in almost all cases. The non-airborne model does not capture the effects of facility scale properly. When analyzing DCH events other than l/10-scale experiments, ~~~should be adjusted to compensate for the difference in scale. The recommended scaling law is Rev O 13-39 6/30/97
Page 1 and 2:
Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0: A Comp
Page 3:
ABSTRACT The CONTAIN 2.0 computer c
Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 4.0 A
Page 8 and 9:
R O TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 6
Page 10 and 11:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 9.1.3
Page 12 and 13:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CO NTINUED) 13.0
Page 14 and 15:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 14.2.
Page 16 and 17:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) 16.3.
Page 18 and 19:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONCLUDED) C.2Va
Page 20 and 21:
LIST OF FIGURES (CO NTINUED) Figure
Page 22 and 23:
LIST OF FIGURES (CONCLUDED) Figure
Page 24 and 25:
LIST OF TABLES (CONCLUDED) Table 9-
Page 27 and 28:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The CONTAIN code i
Page 29 and 30:
. respond under accident conditions
Page 31 and 32:
This code manual includes documenta
Page 33 and 34:
The intent of this document is to p
Page 35:
Table 1-3 Major New Models and Feat
Page 38 and 39:
Deposition/ Agglomeration Rates Hea
Page 40 and 41:
For completeness, the environment o
Page 42 and 43:
ilobal Loop zstart I Input * Loed N
Page 44 and 45:
Table 2-1 lists the internal timest
Page 46 and 47:
where p is the structure density, C
Page 48 and 49:
material definitions are given in t
Page 50 and 51:
water vapor, noncondensable gases (
Page 52 and 53:
2.7 Aerosol Behavior Events occurri
Page 54 and 55:
In addition to these models, fissio
Page 56 and 57:
2.10 Heat and Mass Transfer Through
Page 58 and 59:
diffusion of water and the released
Page 60 and 61:
primary system through a large ice
Page 62 and 63:
Gas Liquid ● argon ● nitrogen
Page 64 and 65:
Table 3-2 References for CONTAIN Ma
Page 66 and 67:
● A common reference temperature,
Page 68 and 69:
where u$T,P) = h$T) = ~~TcP,f(T)dT
Page 70 and 71:
Table 3-3 The Coefficients Aij in E
Page 72 and 73:
To ensure that the extrapolation ha
Page 74 and 75:
4. AssumWion of saturated intermedi
Page 76 and 77:
output after a run is completed, th
Page 79 and 80:
4.0 ATMOSPHERIVPOOL THERMODYNAMIC A
Page 81 and 82:
o 0 *0-0 o +F-ooo 0000 Atmosphere G
Page 83 and 84:
Am An HW ❑ Ht AI * HI= Hb Figure
Page 85 and 86:
connected to the respective cells.
Page 87 and 88:
A side-connected path is defined as
Page 89 and 90:
4.3 ~ tion The flow modeling option
Page 91 and 92:
FLOW option for overcoming the gas
Page 93 and 94:
Table 4-2 Conservation of Momentum
Page 95 and 96:
4.4.3 User-Specified Flow Rates The
Page 97 and 98:
4.4.5 Gravitational Head Modeling T
Page 99 and 100:
gas center-of-volume elevations, in
Page 101 and 102:
crossover parameter y always select
Page 103 and 104:
interface, since in CONTAIN materia
Page 105 and 106:
where dmi ~ Table 4-3 Conservation
Page 107 and 108:
where Table 4-3 Conservation of Mas
Page 109 and 110:
Table 4-4 Conservation of Energy Eq
Page 111 and 112:
Table 4-5 Conservation of Mass Equa
Page 113 and 114:
Table 4-6 Conservation of Energy Eq
Page 115 and 116:
architecture. A gas-pool equilibrat
Page 117 and 118:
Finally, the mass transfer rate of
Page 119 and 120:
where Ap~jis the area of the atmosp
Page 121 and 122:
The FIX-FLOW option may be useful i
Page 123 and 124:
exit losses and other fictional los
Page 125:
. Pressure: where Pi = 2 k=l Table
Page 128 and 129:
CCIS are modeled through an embedde
Page 130 and 131:
~ Boiling \t/ o 0: O.” 0°0000 .O
Page 132 and 133:
the pool layer should lie on top of
Page 134 and 135:
modeled will include the scrubbing
Page 136 and 137:
ebar using the RBRCOMP keyword. Con
Page 138 and 139:
aerosol release model. The allowabl
Page 140 and 141:
Keyword Chemical Symbol Table 5-4 M
Page 142 and 143:
The coolant pool layer is unique in
Page 144 and 145:
water and regarding heat transfer a
Page 146 and 147:
options is directed to the fwst nod
Page 148 and 149:
5.6.2 External Lower Cell Material
Page 150 and 151:
CONTAIN Code Main Modules CONTAIN I
Page 152 and 153:
5.7.5 Restrictions in Mass and Ener
Page 154 and 155:
Both gas-phase and condensed-phase
Page 156 and 157:
decay power calculated in the DECAY
Page 158 and 159:
5.8.15 Energy Conservation (2.3.12
Page 160 and 161:
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. imposed on it by
Page 163 and 164:
6.0 DIRECT CONTAINMENT HEATING (DCH
Page 165 and 166:
● ● ● “. . . . . ● ☞✍
Page 167 and 168:
evolve independently of the other d
Page 169 and 170:
The combined mass flow rate of gas
Page 171 and 172:
where ,=W Ipgu+wi Note that when al
Page 173 and 174:
‘ig,i,k _ — — ~‘jiwji$ ‘g
Page 175 and 176:
entering directly into the atmosphe
Page 177 and 178:
airborne particles can be neglected
Page 179 and 180:
1. Conventional atmospheric source
Page 181 and 182:
ecommended that the user review Ref
Page 183 and 184:
The heat transfer coefficient betwe
Page 185 and 186:
other versions of the Whalley-Hewit
Page 187 and 188:
6.2.10.2 Entrained Fraction Correla
Page 189 and 190:
and [) y+l y+l f(y) = yo”s ~ 2 (y
Page 191 and 192:
ecause the desired fraction of debr
Page 193 and 194:
pdv; NWe=— C! (6-71) where NW.is
Page 195 and 196:
Equations (6-73) and (6-74) may all
Page 197 and 198:
dmd’ ,, ~ +[+” rpv,s [1 ‘t en
Page 199 and 200:
Tin = v.=— g,ln Z ‘g,ji6jiTg,jc
Page 201 and 202:
An important aspect of the CONTAIN
Page 203 and 204:
6.3.6 TOF/KU Trapping Model Like th
Page 205 and 206:
whose default value is 0.32, p~jis
Page 207 and 208:
The flight time and average velocit
Page 209 and 210:
If slip is ignored completely, then
Page 211 and 212:
Zr +2HZ0 + Z@z+2Hz L Fe+ H20 “ zr
Page 213 and 214:
The Reynolds and Schmidt dimensionl
Page 215 and 216:
D H20 = 4.40146 X 10-6 (T~~)2334 P
Page 217 and 218:
.. 1-exp -~ = 0.5 [} ‘d where t~o
Page 219 and 220:
AN~~, = N& 1- exp -— ‘re [{IIAt
Page 221 and 222:
(AI-120)i,n= (~)~oAtC Am,j,.,,=-((A
Page 223 and 224:
where ~~,i,. = (AO&hO~P&i,n) + (AH2
Page 225 and 226:
calculated intercell mass flow rate
Page 227 and 228:
The total radiative energy loss fro
Page 229:
The velocity for non-airborne debri
Page 232 and 233:
UK ~ DSolid Aerosol Water [ A Spray
Page 234 and 235:
● particle scrubbing from gases v
Page 236 and 237:
too small by evaporation of water.
Page 238 and 239:
(7-3) where d(&(t)/dt is the time r
Page 240 and 241:
This constraint thus reduces the nu
Page 242 and 243:
particles can combine at a time. Th
Page 244 and 245:
Except when they include significan
Page 246 and 247:
Table 7-1 Comparison Between Fixed-
Page 248 and 249:
Figure 7-3. Model for Water Condens
Page 250 and 251:
The condensation Reference Pru78: r
Page 252 and 253:
DiffusioDhoresi$. When water conden
Page 254 and 255:
the user may specify these paramete
Page 256 and 257:
The settling area ~ is the sum of a
Page 258 and 259:
The effective cylindrical diameter
Page 260 and 261:
where St is the Stokes number, the
Page 262 and 263:
100 1 ()-1 10-2 1()-3 10-4 ‘\ Tot
Page 264 and 265:
and Potential Flow: ELP E ll,p = =
Page 266 and 267:
The efilciency E of a spray drop ch
Page 268 and 269:
with enhanced scrubbing) or a small
Page 270 and 271:
As an example of difficulties that
Page 272 and 273:
,. - 137c~ / \ P- w 137M Ba 1 137Ba
Page 274 and 275:
user. From this information, the co
Page 276 and 277:
No. 7 No. 8 No. 9 No. 10 No. 11 No.
Page 278 and 279:
~- ~- No. 19 l~R” —> 106Rh~ 106
Page 280 and 281:
No. 28 No. 29 No. 30 No. 31 No. 32
Page 282 and 283:
with the host. In such cases, the f
Page 284 and 285:
103Rhbranch as in the second chain
Page 286 and 287:
and B2, respectively, differing onl
Page 288 and 289:
Table 8-3 Fission Product Library -
Page 290 and 291:
inventory and for time-dependent so
Page 292 and 293:
[Lee80] Note that array space for t
Page 294 and 295:
I GAS UC Atmosphere Heat +%.OOO 00
Page 296 and 297:
where t is the problem time in seco
Page 298 and 299:
where V~ is the drop volume, which
Page 300 and 301:
supplied by the library. Such inven
Page 302 and 303:
The governing equation for the chan
Page 304 and 305:
s DFB is assumed to occur whenever
Page 306 and 307:
The chemical reactions that occur d
Page 308 and 309:
up before ignition occurs. For exam
Page 310 and 311:
delay factor is too small, the tota
Page 312 and 313:
The deflagration model assumes that
Page 314 and 315:
The above correlations assume only
Page 316 and 317:
to occur in the bum model at a reas
Page 318 and 319:
where At~,is the remaining bum time
Page 320 and 321:
Specifically, for DFB to occur, the
Page 322 and 323:
where NtOti= N~ + N~o + ~ is the to
Page 324 and 325:
wheres, is the user-specified spont
Page 326 and 327:
—’ - ● *4 / hMl Outgassing St
Page 328 and 329:
prior to CONTAIN 1.2, there is cons
Page 330 and 331:
except for the error introduced by
Page 332 and 333:
0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 ~ 0.02 h G o s .
Page 334 and 335:
Nk = ~BLcp,BLABL h = kB~N~u/L (10-1
Page 336 and 337:
unsubmerged surface of the structur
Page 338 and 339:
‘=4Hpi-Hb’iF$l (10-15) e where
Page 340 and 341:
to simulate forced convection throu
Page 342 and 343:
10.1.3 Generalized Gas-Structure Co
Page 344 and 345:
Note that the default correlations
Page 346 and 347:
Because the heat and mass transfer
Page 348 and 349:
0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 temperatu
Page 350 and 351:
0.01 0.001 0.0001 0.00001 ~emperatu
Page 352 and 353:
default correlations with ones of t
Page 354 and 355:
The film tracking model is discusse
Page 356 and 357:
this limit would correspond to a fi
Page 358 and 359:
follows the standard recommendation
Page 360 and 361:
In Equation (10-54) the relation 6
Page 362 and 363:
where N is the number of the surfac
Page 364 and 365:
X= XO-b At, AT (lo-66) where X“is
Page 366 and 367:
The ernissivity of each of the abov
Page 368 and 369:
The term ~ in Equation (10-80) is t
Page 370 and 371:
coolant subcooling. The various cor
Page 372 and 373:
If boiling is occurring at the inte
Page 374 and 375:
‘TL.eid,s.b = ATbid + 8 AT,ub (10
Page 376 and 377:
Concrete Air Figure 10-8. Cylindric
Page 378 and 379:
where k is the thermal conductivity
Page 380 and 381:
T 2,eff = T2 h I,eff = hlz whereas
Page 382 and 383:
extrapolated temperature as defined
Page 384 and 385:
Distance ~ ~ Surface Node ~ Nodei F
Page 386 and 387:
The interface temperature Oihas sti
Page 388 and 389:
to be reduced in proportion to this
Page 390 and 391:
fde, TAPE17, to the effect that the
Page 392 and 393:
The outgassing of evaporable water
Page 394 and 395:
Gas Film Boundary Layer Bulk \& I A
Page 396 and 397:
interface temperature. Note that co
Page 398 and 399:
● heat transfer between the atmos
Page 400 and 401:
Reactor Pressure Vessel Drywell Sou
Page 402 and 403:
Figure 11-2. CONTAIN Multi-Node Ven
Page 404 and 405:
L“ ●LO n ‘n I ,a ,rn n I I I
Page 406 and 407:
Table 11-1 Example Solution for Flo
Page 408 and 409:
IDrywell Water Vapor and Gas Source
Page 410 and 411:
—= dx — dt F Pq 1 2[pd - ‘w +
Page 412 and 413:
Drywell, Pd Ii P(f> Pw Vent Vd =
Page 414 and 415:
For flow from wetwell to drywell, a
Page 416 and 417:
Aeff =4 for AP > APU where ~ is the
Page 418 and 419:
the component hosting the fission p
Page 420 and 421:
noncondensable gases multiplied by
Page 423 and 424:
12.0 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE MODE
Page 425 and 426:
~ Spray Flow Path ~~ Reinforced Con
Page 427 and 428:
Inlet Manifold Cold Side Hot Side C
Page 429 and 430:
other than air or superheated condi
Page 431 and 432:
Because the total heat transferred
Page 433 and 434:
7 Plenum t Ice Compartment 1 Accumu
Page 435 and 436: spring or gravity-controlled motion
Page 437 and 438: conditions. If “citlex” does no
Page 439 and 440: where p~is the atmosphere gas mixtu
Page 441 and 442: In these equations, N~~is the drop
Page 443 and 444: Figure 12-8. Th,o ~b Cold Leg (Outl
Page 445 and 446: The capacity-rate ratio CR is defin
Page 447 and 448: Note that the user-specified pump m
Page 449 and 450: 13.0 USER GUIDANCE AND PRACTICAL AN
Page 451 and 452: small flow areas. Also, in the mome
Page 453 and 454: 13.2.4 Aerosol Modeling ~t. The aer
Page 455 and 456: ~s. The heat given off by many radi
Page 457 and 458: concentration in the cell maybe hig
Page 459 and 460: In comparisons with experimental re
Page 461 and 462: It is normally considered inappropr
Page 463 and 464: 0.00016 0.00014 0.00012 0.0001 8E-0
Page 465 and 466: 13.2.9 Calculational Sequence Effec
Page 467 and 468: 13.3.1.3 Modelin~ Stratifications.
Page 469 and 470: Figure 13-2. Two Thermal Siphon Nod
Page 471 and 472: for the Sequoyah plant given in Cha
Page 473 and 474: — uses CONTAIN. In any given anal
Page 475 and 476: 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 (a) / ~ ..” ~ ●
Page 477 and 478: Table 13-1 Summary of the CONTAIN S
Page 479 and 480: 0.4 1J- 2 6.3 d# p“ RPV (13-1) He
Page 481 and 482: 1. Use Equation (13-1) to define z~
Page 483 and 484: In the standard prescription, the c
Page 485: as small pipes, cabling, etc. Impac
Page 489 and 490: equivalent to that of the liquid wa
Page 491 and 492: called “tarnping.” Since aeroso
Page 493 and 494: Co-Eiected Primarv Svstem Water. Wa
Page 495 and 496: .- If the initial atmosphere compos
Page 497 and 498: hybrid solver was not available at
Page 499 and 500: 13.3.2.3 RPV Models. When the RPV a
Page 501 and 502: other governing input parameters. I
Page 503 and 504: and Griffith. ~i196] In addition, t
Page 505 and 506: several reasons, the assessment per
Page 507 and 508: area. It is recommended that the us
Page 509 and 510: 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 \
Page 511 and 512: heat flow under conditions of nearl
Page 513 and 514: dumped into a layer in a short time
Page 515 and 516: Comments at the begiming of an inpu
Page 517: — cannot be modeled directly. How
Page 520 and 521: CELL, must follow the global input.
Page 522 and 523: CELL 1 && beginning of input for ce
Page 524 and 525: In the following input descriptions
Page 526 and 527: A sub-block thus can begin with a l
Page 528 and 529: The global CONTROL block is used to
Page 530 and 531: NENGV = nengv NWDUDM = nwdudm NMTRA
Page 532 and 533: table may be specified after the CO
Page 534 and 535: COMPOUND keyword. Such names need n
Page 536 and 537:
RHOT density values, paired with th
Page 538 and 539:
correspond to the species as they a
Page 540 and 541:
14.2.4 Intercell Flows be considere
Page 542 and 543:
nat the number of cell atmospheres
Page 544 and 545:
cellfr the number of the cell from
Page 546 and 547:
VTOPEN = vtopen TYPE = {GAS or POOL
Page 548 and 549:
RVAREA-P the keyword for initiating
Page 550 and 551:
NWET the number of the cell contain
Page 552 and 553:
(NAME=aname [FLAG=iflag] X=n (x) VA
Page 554 and 555:
keyword will result in the oversize
Page 556 and 557:
SURTEN the surface tension of a wet
Page 558 and 559:
newcof = 2: Coefficients are reques
Page 560 and 561:
FINVT = (finvt) (8-5). If FGPPWR is
Page 562 and 563:
In the input block description of t
Page 564 and 565:
FDISTR = (fdistr) FDEVEN GRPLIM = g
Page 566 and 567:
DIFH20 the multiplier on the mass t
Page 568 and 569:
AHOLE1 the initial hole size in the
Page 570 and 571:
IENFRA = ienfra AFLOW = aflow AHENF
Page 572 and 573:
WESIG the natural logarithm of the
Page 574 and 575:
The EDMULT keyword is useful for re
Page 576 and 577:
PRBURN a keyword which invokes the
Page 578 and 579:
tfac exactly “ncells”values spe
Page 580 and 581:
14.3 Cell Level Input The cell is t
Page 582 and 583:
a pool layer will form in the cours
Page 584 and 585:
NSOSAT the number of safety relief
Page 586 and 587:
GASVOL = gasvol CELLHIST n hl, area
Page 588 and 589:
Presently, DCH and other nongaseous
Page 590 and 591:
xmass the mass of species “oname
Page 592 and 593:
ATMOS=3 EOI PGAS=l.0E5 TGAS=335 SAT
Page 594 and 595:
[INIDEPTH=indpth] [MINDEPTH=rnndpth
Page 596 and 597:
STRUC CRANK = crank OUTGAS TRANGE t
Page 598 and 599:
kco2 eco2 QH20E = qh20e QH20B = qh2
Page 600 and 601:
cYLHn-’E the axial length of a cy
Page 602 and 603:
FORCOR1 =a3b3c3 d3 FORCOR2 =a4b4c4
Page 604 and 605:
VELOCITY, REY-NUM, and NUS-FORC are
Page 606 and 607:
whether net condensation or evapora
Page 608 and 609:
cylinder. Here, RI is the cylinder
Page 610 and 611:
istr hgap ICELL = icell TGAS = tgas
Page 612 and 613:
14.3.1.5 Radiation. The radiation m
Page 614 and 615:
eaml EOI GASWAL = gaswal GEOBL geob
Page 616 and 617:
Table 14-1 Types of Bums Allowed fo
Page 618 and 619:
0.0376. Thekeyword CFRMNGserves the
Page 620 and 621:
DEBCONC the concentration of debris
Page 622 and 623:
14.4.1. The particle size distribut
Page 624 and 625:
14.3.1.10 Fission Product Initial C
Page 626 and 627:
FROM = marne TO = aname “mame”
Page 628 and 629:
The following keywords and associat
Page 630 and 631:
LENGFT = xleng KU1 = xku 1 KU2 = xk
Page 632 and 633:
and the DIATR4P, VELTRAP, and IL4.D
Page 634 and 635:
(data) EOIl [CONCRETE (data) EOIl (
Page 636 and 637:
EOI [Q235U=q235u] [Q238U=q238u] [Q2
Page 638 and 639:
EOI EOIl T=(times) MASS=(masses) {T
Page 640 and 641:
HT-COEF NAME olay oxopt nh xhtval h
Page 642 and 643:
EOI EOI [USERSENS [{HXBOTCOR ahtb b
Page 644 and 645:
RBRCOMP ometl fmfrac EOI cmass TEMP
Page 646 and 647:
w the outside radius of the cylinde
Page 648 and 649:
SLAGSIDE a keyword which enables th
Page 650 and 651:
HBOILFLX = nhb dtsat bflx HBOILMUL
Page 652 and 653:
RHOOMUL = rhomul TSOMLT = tsomlt XE
Page 654 and 655:
DETAIL nvcons ovnam nfp ofpnam wfra
Page 656 and 657:
into CONTAIN. The obsolete VANESA k
Page 658 and 659:
SOURCE nso Q-VOL HT-COEF the keywor
Page 660 and 661:
smo TMETAL = tmi TOXIDE = toi LAYER
Page 662 and 663:
METALPWR the keyword to begin speci
Page 664 and 665:
14.3.3 Engineered Safety Systems Th
Page 666 and 667:
iclin iclout delev now automaticall
Page 668 and 669:
FCFLAR the frontal area of the fan
Page 670 and 671:
DIAMDIF the effective wire cylindri
Page 672 and 673:
hxarea the effective heat transfer
Page 674 and 675:
PIPE the keyword to specify a pipe
Page 676 and 677:
EOI (oaer=na [IFLAG=ival] [AMEAN=(m
Page 678 and 679:
SOURCE nsosfp Ofp nf HOST = nhost C
Page 680 and 681:
with standard keywords. Thus the pr
Page 682 and 683:
encountered. Aerosol suspended mass
Page 684 and 685:
EOI the keyword used to terminate e
Page 686 and 687:
[PRFLOW [{ON or OFF}]] [PRAER [{ON
Page 688 and 689:
14.5.1.1 The TIMES Block in a Resta
Page 690 and 691:
AEROSOL a keyword sequence to speci
Page 693 and 694:
15.0 SAMPLE PLANT CALCULATIONS In t
Page 695 and 696:
Table 15-1 Grand Gulf Input File (C
Page 697 and 698:
— o1 DRYWELL t o2 ANNULUS Figure
Page 699 and 700:
. 2 190 PO o - 170 aJ L 3 In (n a)
Page 701 and 702:
3 0 r w.- 3 0- .- _d 120 100 80 60
Page 703 and 704:
8 7 1 0 % :k I I i I I I I I I I 1
Page 705 and 706:
15.2 Surry Plant In the second samp
Page 707 and 708:
Table 15-2 Surry Input File (Contin
Page 709 and 710:
Page 711 and 712:
Page 713 and 714:
Page 715 and 716:
Page 717 and 718:
Page 719 and 720:
Page 721 and 722:
Page 723 and 724:
Page 725 and 726:
mass= O.OOOOOe+OO 1.45045e+Ol 1.438
Page 727 and 728:
3.05000e-01 eoi Table 15-2 Surry In
Page 729 and 730:
concrete in the cavity and thus the
Page 731 and 732:
500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100
Page 733 and 734:
-. The amount of water boiled and e
Page 735 and 736:
.- 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3
Page 737 and 738:
c .— s o .- rn (J-J K 1 0+2 10-3
Page 739 and 740:
5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4
Page 741 and 742:
Table 15-3 Sequoyah Input File && -
Page 743 and 744:
Table 15-3 Sequoyah Input File (Con
Page 745 and 746:
2.8000e+Ol 2.8000e+Ol 2.8000e+Ol en
Page 747 and 748:
8.0500e+02 8.0650e+02 eoi feed debr
Page 749 and 750:
eoi 1.0000e+Ol 1.0000e+Ol 1.0000e+O
Page 751 and 752:
Page 753 and 754:
eoi Table 15-3 Sequoyah Input File
Page 755 and 756:
Page 757 and 758:
Page 759 and 760:
Page 761 and 762:
Page 763 and 764:
eoi 4.30918e+06 4.34125e+06 4.52691
Page 765 and 766:
Page 767 and 768:
eoi 1.55497e+07 1.58464e+07 1.65145
Page 769 and 770:
Page 771 and 772:
var-y=diatrap eoi trapping to fku &
Page 773 and 774:
Page 775 and 776:
Page 777 and 778:
o 8 w s H I E 5 UP Co L I D 3’ 4
Page 779 and 780:
Table 15-4 Sequoyah Restart Input F
Page 781 and 782:
.. Table 15-4 Sequoyah Restart Inpu
Page 783 and 784:
eoi dch-cell sdeven= 1.0 && default
Page 785 and 786:
Table 15-4 Sequoyah Restart Input F
Page 787 and 788:
compartment. The subsequent upward
Page 789 and 790:
350 I I I I I I I i I I I i 325 300
Page 791 and 792:
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ? i I i / /
Page 793 and 794:
combustion as calculated by the hyd
Page 795 and 796:
16.1 Introduction 16.0 OUTPUT FILES
Page 797 and 798:
will report conditions that might h
Page 799 and 800:
To achieve this objective, POSTCON
Page 801 and 802:
typically very undescriptive, a sho
Page 803 and 804:
Table 16-1 Item Keywords (Continued
Page 805 and 806:
Page 807 and 808:
Page 809 and 810:
Page 811 and 812:
Table 16-2 Default Conversion Facto
Page 813 and 814:
16.3.4.1 Simzle Pass. For simple pr
Page 815 and 816:
16.4.1.3 Bin ary Plot File (PLTFIL)
Page 817 and 818:
16.5 COntrol Block The general stru
Page 819 and 820:
MAXSNI? keyword that initiates inpu
Page 821 and 822:
EOI termination for the entire cont
Page 823 and 824:
VECTOR ovname keyword that initiate
Page 825 and 826:
EOF keyword thatterminates theendof
Page 827 and 828:
POSTCON routine, and possibly writi
Page 829 and 830:
Three units are converted in this e
Page 831 and 832:
pltfil=plotl pout=poutl pvec=pvecl
Page 833 and 834:
&& poet snapshot vector for flag: 5
Page 835 and 836:
Figure 16-9. PMIX1 File from Exampl
Page 837 and 838:
cell=2 vector=mettmp layer=3 type=t
Page 839:
16.10.3 Output Handling When a user
Page 842 and 843:
Ben84 Ber85a Ber85b Ber86 Bi193 Bin
Page 844 and 845:
Dhi78 Din86 Dui89 Dun84 Edw73 E1w62
Page 846 and 847:
Hin82 H068 H0168 Hot67 HUS88 Ide60
Page 848 and 849:
Low82 Lui83 Lut91 Mak70 Mar86 Mas58
Page 850 and 851:
Pi195 Pi196 Pit89 Pon90 POW86 POW93
Page 852 and 853:
Sum95 Ta180 Tam85 Tarn87 Tam88 Tar8
Page 854 and 855:
was95 Wea85 Web92 Wei72 Wha78 Wi187
Page 857 and 858:
A. 1 Introduction APPENDIX A DETAIL
Page 859 and 860:
thermodynamic states. However, the
Page 861 and 862:
= h~(T) (for non-coolant liquids, s
Page 863 and 864:
(A-4) where N~X~j is the number of
Page 865 and 866:
.. in the liquid and vapor enthalpi
Page 867 and 868:
APPENDIX B 1 ALTERNATE INPUT FORMAT
Page 869 and 870:
.- AREA,i,j = area AVL,i,j = avl CF
Page 871 and 872:
n x PDAFLAG keyword discussed above
Page 873 and 874:
parameter string, the redefined val
Page 875 and 876:
RELEASE specifies nontargeted relea
Page 877 and 878:
nraycc number of rays used to model
Page 879 and 880:
ishape nslab ibc tint Chrl vufac bc
Page 881 and 882:
keywords FLAG, X, and Y are given i
Page 883 and 884:
C. 1 Introduction APPENDIX C VALIDA
Page 885 and 886:
Validation is considered outside th
Page 887 and 888:
2) Medium = prediction of prime qua
Page 889 and 890:
C.3.4 Aerosol Behavior Table C-7 pr
Page 891 and 892:
product behavior, it can be used to
Page 893 and 894:
Table C-1 CONTAIN Code Release Hist
Page 895 and 896:
Table C-3 Validation Matrix for Atm
Page 897 and 898:
Page 899 and 900:
Page 901 and 902:
Page 903 and 904:
Page 905 and 906:
Table C-4 Validation Matrix for Hea
Page 907 and 908:
Table C-5 Validation Matrix for Hea
Page 909 and 910:
I Validation Type/Basis Separate ef
Page 911 and 912:
Table C-6 Validation Matrix for DCH
Page 913 and 914:
Table C-6 Validation Matrix for DCH
Page 915 and 916:
Experiment (Test Facility) SNLJIET-
Page 917 and 918:
(Footnotes for Table C-6 Continued)
Page 919 and 920:
Table C-7 Validation Matrix for Aer
Page 921 and 922:
Table C-8 Validation Matrix for Hyd
Page 923 and 924:
Table C-10 Validation Matrix for Mi
Page 925 and 926:
n 400 ) 300 % $ 200 ~ * o 6 100 * z
Page 927 and 928:
~ ~ 0.10 0.08 g 0.06 a fn g n g 0.0
Page 929 and 930:
g 403 393 383 373 363 353 343 333 3
Page 931 and 932:
Has96b Hei86 Huh93 Jac89 Jon87 Jon8
Page 933 and 934:
Mur83b Mur88 Mur89 Mur96 0wc85 Pet9
Page 935 and 936:
Ti191 Ti196 Uch65 Va183 va188 Ver87
Page 937 and 938:
D. 1 Introduction APPENDIX D QUALIT
Page 939 and 940:
L==I-----F -—— - L I I I Desk M
Page 941 and 942:
Ir Lo! (o) Releases \ II T ata chan
Page 943 and 944:
the difilculty, resolving the issue
Page 945 and 946:
When the review is complete, the up
Page 947 and 948:
● ensures that modifications will
Page 949 and 950:
-. . ---ula GMF Program Library \ O
Page 951 and 952:
instruction set that creates the va
Page 953 and 954:
experimental results. The objective
Page 955 and 956:
D.2.6.4 Test Doc umentation. In eve
Page 957 and 958:
REFERENCES Bi194 S. C. Billups et a
Page 960:
4 QPrinted on recycled paper Federa
show all

Code Manual for CONTAIN 2.0 - Federation of American Scientists

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?