Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
past conduct <strong>of</strong> the parties. This may include past breaches <strong>of</strong> covenant, whether<br />
or not they constituted tenant default and whether or not they have been<br />
remedied. 87<br />
5.115 It is at this stage <strong>of</strong> its determination that the court may consider the extent to<br />
which the parties have acted reasonably. Evidence <strong>of</strong> an unreasonable refusal by<br />
either party to negotiate or to take part in proportionate dispute resolution that<br />
might have avoided court proceedings should be considered at this stage (as well<br />
as at the stage <strong>of</strong> considering costs). 88<br />
5.116 It is particularly important, in light <strong>of</strong> the fact that we do not attempt to replicate<br />
the doctrine <strong>of</strong> waiver in the scheme, that the court takes account <strong>of</strong> any conduct<br />
that has led the tenant reasonably to believe that the landlord has accepted the<br />
tenant default being complained <strong>of</strong>. 89 Equally, the court should take account <strong>of</strong><br />
any conduct <strong>of</strong> the tenant that might have misled the landlord into acquiescing in<br />
the tenant default.<br />
(2) Qualifying interests<br />
5.117 Where the applicant <strong>for</strong> an order is a qualifying interest holder, factor (1) requires<br />
the court to take his or her conduct into account as well as the conduct <strong>of</strong> the<br />
landlord and <strong>of</strong> the tenant. But in every case where there are qualifying interests<br />
in the tenancy we believe that the court should take those interests into account,<br />
whether or not the holders <strong>of</strong> those interests have applied <strong>for</strong> an order to protect<br />
their interests (discussed in Part 6).<br />
5.118 In considering any particular qualifying interest, we would expect the court to take<br />
account <strong>of</strong> its nature and terms. By this we mean the type <strong>of</strong> interest (the range <strong>of</strong><br />
qualifying interests are set out in Part 6), its duration or size and the terms on<br />
which the interest was granted. For example, where a sub-tenancy has been<br />
granted <strong>for</strong> almost the whole term <strong>of</strong> the tenancy or there is a significant<br />
mortgage over the tenancy, the court should take these factors into account<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e making a termination order that will effectively terminate these interests as<br />
well as the tenancy that they are derived from.<br />
5.119 The court’s attention is also drawn to the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the creation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
qualifying interest in question. For the reasons we discuss in Part 6, we do not<br />
exclude from the protection <strong>of</strong> the scheme sub-tenancies or mortgages that were<br />
created without the landlord’s consent (where such consent is required).<br />
However, we would want the lawfulness or otherwise <strong>of</strong> the sub-tenancy or<br />
mortgage to be taken into account by the court in deciding what order to make.<br />
87 See CP, para 4.26.<br />
88<br />
This is in line with the approach taken under the Civil Procedure Rules to parties who fail to<br />
follow a relevant pre-action protocol.<br />
89 See CP, para 4.32.<br />
100