15.08.2013 Views

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

similarly be entitled to refer the notice to court, where <strong>for</strong> example injunctive relief<br />

is required to restrain a breach <strong>of</strong> covenant or prevent further damage to the<br />

premises.<br />

Re<strong>for</strong>m recommendations<br />

4.79 A chief aim <strong>of</strong> our recommendations is <strong>for</strong> landlord and tenant to reach a<br />

negotiated settlement <strong>of</strong> their dispute, thereby avoiding the need to engage the<br />

court.<br />

4.80 On reconsideration, we have concluded that there is a danger that the provisional<br />

proposal that a tenant should be able to refer a tenant default notice to the court<br />

might actually work against these aims. Service <strong>of</strong> a tenant default notice is a<br />

pre-requisite <strong>for</strong> making a termination claim (unless the need <strong>for</strong> a tenant default<br />

notice is dispensed with by the court) but it is by no means certain that a claim<br />

will be commenced in every case where a notice is served. We would hope that<br />

in a large proportion <strong>of</strong> cases service <strong>of</strong> the notice will prompt negotiations that<br />

will lead to a settlement out <strong>of</strong> court. To allow a tenant or qualifying interest<br />

holder who receives a tenant default notice to refer it to the court might there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

precipitate litigation and expend court time in circumstances where the notice<br />

might otherwise have led to a negotiated settlement.<br />

4.81 Changes to the CP’s provisional proposals have also in our view rendered this<br />

particular proposal unnecessary. As previously conceived, a pre-action notice<br />

(now tenant default notice) would be served whether the landlord intended to<br />

make a termination claim or unilaterally recover possession <strong>of</strong> the demised<br />

premises. By referring the notice to the court, a tenant would be able to prevent<br />

the landlord taking possession unilaterally. We have now revised our proposals<br />

and no longer recommend that a landlord may unilaterally recover possession <strong>of</strong><br />

the demised premises. Instead, a landlord will, in restricted circumstances, be<br />

able to make use <strong>of</strong> a summary termination procedure (set out in Part 7). But this<br />

procedure is not commenced by service <strong>of</strong> a tenant default notice. 65 There is<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e no possibility that a tenant who is served with a tenant default notice will<br />

lose his or her tenancy other than by means <strong>of</strong> a court order.<br />

4.82 We do not believe that it is necessary to make express provision <strong>for</strong> a landlord to<br />

refer a tenant default notice to court to seek injunctive relief be<strong>for</strong>e making a<br />

termination claim. A landlord may bring proceedings <strong>for</strong> an injunction or other<br />

interlocutory relief in such cases under the general law.<br />

SPECIAL REPAIRS PROCEDURE<br />

4.83 The Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 Act <strong>of</strong>fers protection <strong>for</strong> tenants<br />

against claims brought by their landlords <strong>for</strong> damages <strong>for</strong> breach <strong>of</strong> repairing<br />

covenants or <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>feiture on the ground <strong>of</strong> such a breach. The legislation was<br />

passed to address the mischief <strong>of</strong> property speculators gaining a windfall by<br />

buying cheap reversions <strong>of</strong> dilapidated properties whose tenants could not af<strong>for</strong>d<br />

to pay <strong>for</strong> repairs and then en<strong>for</strong>cing <strong>for</strong>feiture <strong>for</strong> disrepair. Originally limited to<br />

repairing covenants in long leases <strong>of</strong> small houses, the 1938 Act now applies to<br />

65 Rather, the procedure will be commenced by service <strong>of</strong> a summary termination notice,<br />

which the court can discharge on application by the recipient: see para 7.94 and following.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!