Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
emphasise what the <strong>Commission</strong> was hoping to achieve with this new statutory<br />
right <strong>of</strong> re-entry:<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the new right is to provide landlords <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />
premises with a management tool to protect both the value <strong>of</strong> their<br />
investment and their income stream where the tenant has defaulted<br />
on the covenants or conditions contained in the lease. It will be <strong>of</strong><br />
particular value where there is no realistic prospect <strong>of</strong> the tenant or<br />
the owner <strong>of</strong> any derivative interest obtaining relief from the court.<br />
However, the right would not operate in a way that would unfairly<br />
deprive tenants and the owners <strong>of</strong> derivative interests <strong>of</strong> a reasonable<br />
opportunity to apply <strong>for</strong> relief. 28<br />
7.25 After consultation, <strong>Commission</strong>ers agreed to depart from the recommendations<br />
contained in the First Report to which the 1994 Bill sought to give effect. A press<br />
release, published in June 1999, stated that the <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> now intended<br />
to recommend:<br />
(1) the retention <strong>of</strong> a landlord’s right to terminate a tenancy by physical reentry;<br />
but<br />
(2) that the existing right <strong>of</strong> re-entry should be replaced with a new statutory<br />
right which would be subject to rational procedural and notice<br />
requirements and appropriate safeguards.<br />
7.26 The key difference between the current law and the proposed new statutory right<br />
<strong>of</strong> re-entry was that exercise <strong>of</strong> the statutory right would not bring the tenancy to<br />
an end immediately. Instead, the landlord’s action would initiate a process<br />
whereby the tenancy would terminate automatically after a fixed period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
This period <strong>of</strong> time was intended to give the tenant and certain derivative interest<br />
holders the opportunity to apply to the court <strong>for</strong> relief. The tenancy would<br />
continue during the period between re-entry and termination. The tenant would<br />
there<strong>for</strong>e remain liable <strong>for</strong> rent and would be expected to observe the covenants<br />
in the tenancy, at least those which they were able to observe while out <strong>of</strong><br />
occupation. No provision was made <strong>for</strong> the tenant or any derivative interest<br />
holder to make any application <strong>for</strong> relief after the tenancy had terminated.<br />
7.27 The modified recommendation included a requirement that a minimum <strong>of</strong> seven<br />
days’ notice <strong>of</strong> the landlord’s intention to physically re-enter should be given in all<br />
cases. There would be restrictions on the right to exercise physical re-entry at all<br />
in relation to residential premises, tenancies with an unexpired term <strong>of</strong> 25 years<br />
or more, and circumstances where the breach <strong>of</strong> covenant complained <strong>of</strong> related<br />
to disputed service charges. It was made clear that the statutory right would only<br />
be exercisable in circumstances where the landlord would be entitled to bring a<br />
claim under the court-based procedure.<br />
28 Landlord and <strong>Tenant</strong> <strong>Law</strong>: <strong>Termination</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Tenancies</strong> by Physical Re-entry (January 1998)<br />
<strong>Law</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> Consultative Document, para 3.16.<br />
137