Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The CP’s provisional proposals<br />
4.6 The CP provisionally proposed that a landlord must serve a notice on his or her<br />
tenant prior to commencing termination order proceedings, whatever the tenant<br />
default complained <strong>of</strong>. 3 It also proposed that a copy <strong>of</strong> the notice should be<br />
served on holders <strong>of</strong> those derivative interests falling within a qualifying class. 4<br />
Consultation<br />
4.7 This proposal was widely supported by consultees. The Bar Council believed that<br />
“the requirement <strong>for</strong> a notice be<strong>for</strong>e action is fundamental to the protection <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rights <strong>of</strong> tenants”. HH John Colyer QC considered the mandatory requirement <strong>for</strong><br />
a notice in all cases, including non-payment <strong>of</strong> rent, “essential to fair play” and<br />
believed it would reduce litigation.<br />
4.8 Since publishing the CP, we have met with members <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Mortgage<br />
Lenders. They were highly supportive <strong>of</strong> the suggestion that derivative interest<br />
holders (including mortgagees) should receive a tenant default notice. They<br />
confirmed that, at present, their members <strong>of</strong>ten learn <strong>of</strong> the <strong>for</strong>feiture <strong>of</strong> a tenancy<br />
over which a mortgage is secured only when HM Land Registry contact them<br />
during the process <strong>of</strong> closing title, long after the <strong>for</strong>feiture has been effected. 5<br />
Re<strong>for</strong>m recommendations<br />
4.9 We intend to proceed with the substance <strong>of</strong> this provisional proposal with some<br />
modifications. We replace the term “pre-action notice”, which we used in the CP,<br />
with the term “tenant default notice”. We believe that this better describes the<br />
function <strong>of</strong> the notice, which is to in<strong>for</strong>m any recipient <strong>of</strong> the tenant default and to<br />
encourage the tenant to take remedial action or enter into negotiations with the<br />
landlord. The notice will not be followed by the making <strong>of</strong> a termination claim in all<br />
cases. Indeed, the notice will have served its purpose if it leads to a negotiated<br />
settlement.<br />
4.10 We recommend that a landlord may not make a termination claim on the<br />
ground <strong>of</strong> a tenant default unless he or she has given the tenant, and the<br />
holder <strong>of</strong> any qualifying interest in the tenancy, a tenant default notice<br />
specifying the tenant default. 6<br />
4.11 We recognise that there may be circumstances in which it will be appropriate <strong>for</strong><br />
the court to dispense with the requirement that a landlord give a tenant default<br />
notice to the tenant and to all qualifying interest holders be<strong>for</strong>e making a<br />
termination claim. We do not believe that it would be helpful <strong>for</strong> legislation to<br />
prescribe the specific circumstances appropriate to the exercise <strong>of</strong> such a power<br />
but it should be stressed that we would anticipate these to be exceptional cases.<br />
3 CP, para 12.5(1). A notice would also be required prior to the landlord exercising self-help<br />
by what we called “unilateral recovery <strong>of</strong> possession”.<br />
4 CP, para 12.7(5). Derivative interests are discussed in Part 6.<br />
5<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> residential property let on a tenancy, but in no other case, the claimant must<br />
file a copy <strong>of</strong> their particulars <strong>of</strong> claim with the court <strong>for</strong> service on anyone entitled to claim<br />
relief against <strong>for</strong>feiture (including a mortgagee): Civil Procedure Rules, Practice Direction<br />
55, para 2.4.<br />
6 Draft Bill, cl 4.<br />
56