Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Parliament. However, since this power is strictly limited, clause 33(2) provides <strong>for</strong><br />
a lower level <strong>of</strong> scrutiny (though see the notes on clause 33 in this respect).<br />
169. Note also the amendments made by Schedule 6 to some <strong>of</strong> the enactments<br />
mentioned in this Schedule.<br />
Schedule 2: <strong>Tenant</strong> default: special cases<br />
170. This clause makes certain exceptions and qualifications to the definition <strong>of</strong><br />
tenant default contained in clause 2(1).<br />
171. Paragraphs 2 to 5 amend sections 167, 168 and 169 <strong>of</strong> the Commonhold<br />
and Leasehold Re<strong>for</strong>m Act 2002 to take account <strong>of</strong> the Bill.<br />
172. Paragraph 6 makes special provision <strong>for</strong> determining when a covenant to<br />
pay rent is to be treated as breached. The question whether a breach <strong>of</strong> the<br />
covenant is a tenant default will then depend on whether or not the covenant is<br />
excepted under clause 2.<br />
173. Paragraph 6 does not apply in relation to a long lease <strong>of</strong> a dwelling (as<br />
defined by section 38 <strong>of</strong> the Landlord and <strong>Tenant</strong> Act 1985) by virtue <strong>of</strong> subparagraph<br />
(5). It allows <strong>for</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> rent within any grace period provided <strong>for</strong> in<br />
the tenancy. It is usually the case that the tenancy will provide that the tenant<br />
must pay rent within so many days <strong>of</strong> the rent falling due. In the absence <strong>of</strong> any<br />
such provision, the covenant will be treated as breached if the rent is not paid<br />
within a period <strong>of</strong> 21 days from the date the rent becomes due.<br />
174. Sub-paragraph (1) is prompted by the common law principle that nonpayment<br />
<strong>of</strong> rent does not give rise to a <strong>for</strong>feiture unless a <strong>for</strong>mal demand is made<br />
<strong>for</strong> the rent or the tenancy (as is <strong>of</strong>ten the case) dispenses with the need <strong>for</strong> such<br />
a demand. Under the scheme, no <strong>for</strong>mal demand is necessary unless it is<br />
expressly required by the terms <strong>of</strong> the tenancy.<br />
175. Paragraph 7 deals with the condition implied by law into every tenancy that<br />
the tenant must not prejudice his landlord’s title by denying or disclaiming it.<br />
Breach <strong>of</strong> this implied condition will not be a tenant default and so a landlord will<br />
not be able to take termination action in respect <strong>of</strong> it. However, if the tenancy<br />
contains an express covenant not to deny the landlord’s title, breach <strong>of</strong> that<br />
covenant will be a tenant default (unless the covenant is excepted).<br />
176. Paragraph 8 makes special provision <strong>for</strong> unlawful assignments (that is,<br />
assignments made in breach <strong>of</strong> covenant).<br />
177. Where there is an unlawful assignment, the first step will be to determine<br />
under clause 2 whether breach <strong>of</strong> the covenant against assignment is a tenant<br />
default. Assuming that it is, the question then is who committed the breach.<br />
Clause 2 refers to breach by the tenant (or a person who has guaranteed the<br />
tenant’s obligations under the tenancy). By clause 29(3), “tenant” means the<br />
current tenant, who did not <strong>of</strong> course commit the breach. The landlord will not be<br />
entitled (on an assignment <strong>of</strong> the whole) to take termination action against the<br />
<strong>for</strong>mer tenant who was responsible <strong>for</strong> the assignment <strong>for</strong> the very reason that he<br />
or she is no longer the tenant. Sub-paragraph (2) there<strong>for</strong>e provides that the<br />
breach <strong>of</strong> the covenant against assignment is to be treated as a breach by the<br />
237