Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
including a termination order, that is appropriate and proportionate<br />
in the circumstances; 31<br />
(3) unless such an order has effect, the proceedings on the termination<br />
claim will be stayed <strong>for</strong> three months from the day after the<br />
specified day; 32<br />
(4) the landlord may apply <strong>for</strong> the stay to be lifted on the ground that<br />
the tenant did not complete the specified action be<strong>for</strong>e the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the specified day; 33<br />
(5) if the court, on such an application, lifts the stay, it may make any<br />
order under the scheme that is appropriate and proportionate in the<br />
circumstances; 34 and<br />
(6) if the court dismisses an application to lift the stay, or no such<br />
application is made during the period <strong>of</strong> the stay, the proceedings<br />
on the termination claim shall come to an end. 35<br />
ORDERS FOR SALE<br />
5.48 Under the current law, a completed <strong>for</strong>feiture, where the court has not granted<br />
relief, results in the termination <strong>of</strong> the tenancy. Where the tenancy has a high<br />
capital value, typically a long residential tenancy or a commercial tenancy<br />
granted <strong>for</strong> a long fixed term, the tenant stands to lose a significant asset with no<br />
compensation. Any mortgagees or sub-tenants also stand to lose their potentially<br />
valuable interests in the tenancy, as these interests automatically terminate along<br />
with the <strong>for</strong>feited tenancy. 36 Meanwhile, the demised premises revert to the<br />
landlord far sooner than would have been the case had the tenancy run on <strong>for</strong> its<br />
full contractual term. The landlord is free to deal with the premises as he or she<br />
sees fit, typically by letting them to a new tenant or by selling the reversion,<br />
unburdened by the <strong>for</strong>feited long tenancy. The result is that the landlord may<br />
receive a significant windfall at the expense <strong>of</strong> the tenant and derivative interest<br />
holders. We consider this to be a defect in the current law.<br />
The CP’s provisional proposals<br />
5.49 The CP provisionally proposed that a court hearing a landlord’s termination claim<br />
would be able to make an absolute termination order, a remedial order or no<br />
order. 37 An absolute termination order would bring the tenancy and any interests<br />
which derive from it to an end, with all the potential unfairness we have just<br />
31 Draft Bill, cl 13(2).<br />
32 Draft Bill, cl 13(3).<br />
33 Draft Bill, cl 13(4).<br />
34 Draft Bill, cl 13(4).<br />
35 Draft Bill, cl 13(5).<br />
36 Subject to such independent right as they may have to claim relief.<br />
37 CP, para 12.6(2), (4) and (6). A number <strong>of</strong> additional orders could be made only on the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> the “derivative class”: CP, Part VII. These provisional proposals<br />
and our final recommendations are dealt with in Part 6.<br />
85