15.08.2013 Views

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

including a termination order, that is appropriate and proportionate<br />

in the circumstances; 31<br />

(3) unless such an order has effect, the proceedings on the termination<br />

claim will be stayed <strong>for</strong> three months from the day after the<br />

specified day; 32<br />

(4) the landlord may apply <strong>for</strong> the stay to be lifted on the ground that<br />

the tenant did not complete the specified action be<strong>for</strong>e the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the specified day; 33<br />

(5) if the court, on such an application, lifts the stay, it may make any<br />

order under the scheme that is appropriate and proportionate in the<br />

circumstances; 34 and<br />

(6) if the court dismisses an application to lift the stay, or no such<br />

application is made during the period <strong>of</strong> the stay, the proceedings<br />

on the termination claim shall come to an end. 35<br />

ORDERS FOR SALE<br />

5.48 Under the current law, a completed <strong>for</strong>feiture, where the court has not granted<br />

relief, results in the termination <strong>of</strong> the tenancy. Where the tenancy has a high<br />

capital value, typically a long residential tenancy or a commercial tenancy<br />

granted <strong>for</strong> a long fixed term, the tenant stands to lose a significant asset with no<br />

compensation. Any mortgagees or sub-tenants also stand to lose their potentially<br />

valuable interests in the tenancy, as these interests automatically terminate along<br />

with the <strong>for</strong>feited tenancy. 36 Meanwhile, the demised premises revert to the<br />

landlord far sooner than would have been the case had the tenancy run on <strong>for</strong> its<br />

full contractual term. The landlord is free to deal with the premises as he or she<br />

sees fit, typically by letting them to a new tenant or by selling the reversion,<br />

unburdened by the <strong>for</strong>feited long tenancy. The result is that the landlord may<br />

receive a significant windfall at the expense <strong>of</strong> the tenant and derivative interest<br />

holders. We consider this to be a defect in the current law.<br />

The CP’s provisional proposals<br />

5.49 The CP provisionally proposed that a court hearing a landlord’s termination claim<br />

would be able to make an absolute termination order, a remedial order or no<br />

order. 37 An absolute termination order would bring the tenancy and any interests<br />

which derive from it to an end, with all the potential unfairness we have just<br />

31 Draft Bill, cl 13(2).<br />

32 Draft Bill, cl 13(3).<br />

33 Draft Bill, cl 13(4).<br />

34 Draft Bill, cl 13(4).<br />

35 Draft Bill, cl 13(5).<br />

36 Subject to such independent right as they may have to claim relief.<br />

37 CP, para 12.6(2), (4) and (6). A number <strong>of</strong> additional orders could be made only on the<br />

application <strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> the “derivative class”: CP, Part VII. These provisional proposals<br />

and our final recommendations are dealt with in Part 6.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!