Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
43. An application <strong>for</strong> a dispensation order might be made in a case where the<br />
landlord has used the summary termination procedure but the tenant obtains a<br />
discharge order (see clauses 22 and 23).<br />
44. For example, if the six-month default period has expired by the time the<br />
discharge order is made, the landlord would be unable to serve a tenant default<br />
notice in respect <strong>of</strong> that tenant default (and would there<strong>for</strong>e be unable to make a<br />
termination claim). However, the landlord could apply to the court <strong>for</strong> a<br />
dispensation order to waive the time limits or the requirement to serve a tenant<br />
default notice on some <strong>of</strong> the individuals concerned.<br />
45. Another example <strong>of</strong> when this power might be used is where the landlord<br />
has discovered that there is a qualifying interest in the tenancy but has been<br />
unable to find an address or other contact details <strong>for</strong> the holder <strong>of</strong> that interest.<br />
46. Subsection (3) acknowledges that a landlord may bring a termination claim<br />
without having complied with one or more <strong>of</strong> the requirements prescribed by<br />
clause 4(1). The subsection reflects what will be the practical reality; namely that<br />
a court <strong>of</strong>fice, when issuing a claim, will not be able to establish whether a<br />
landlord has complied with the notice requirements. The landlord will have to<br />
apply <strong>for</strong> a dispensation order so as to regularise the claim retrospectively.<br />
47. Subsection (6) ensures that, where some or all <strong>of</strong> the requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
clause 4 are dispensed with, the clauses dependent on service <strong>of</strong> a tenant default<br />
notice are to be read subject to the order <strong>of</strong> the court.<br />
48. As there may not have been a tenant default notice served by the landlord,<br />
there may not be a deadline (see clause 6(2)(b) and (6)) after which the period<br />
<strong>for</strong> bringing a termination claim will begin to run. There<strong>for</strong>e, subsection (5)(a)<br />
provides that a dispensation order must state the date by which the landlord is<br />
entitled to bring a termination claim.<br />
Clause 9: The court’s power<br />
49. Subsection (1) confers a wide discretion on the court in a case where it<br />
finds that there has been a tenant default. Any order the court makes must be<br />
appropriate and proportionate.<br />
50. Subsection (2) lists the new orders that are available to the court under the<br />
new scheme (each <strong>of</strong> which is defined in clause 10 and then set out in more<br />
detail in clauses 12 to 17). Subsection (1) does not restrict the court to making<br />
one <strong>of</strong> those orders. It can make any other order otherwise available to it. Indeed,<br />
it may decide to make no order at all if, <strong>for</strong> example, it considers the default to be<br />
trivial.<br />
51. Subsection (3) sets out the factors the court should take into consideration<br />
when deciding what order to make. They are not ranked in order <strong>of</strong> importance.<br />
Not all factors will be relevant to all cases.<br />
52. Subsection (4) enables the court to require payments to be made or<br />
security to be provided. This power may be used against any party to the<br />
proceedings, not just the tenant.<br />
223