15.08.2013 Views

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.12 We recommend that the court should be entitled, on application by the<br />

landlord, to make an order dispensing with the requirement to give a tenant<br />

default notice where it thinks it just and equitable to do so. 7<br />

THE DEFAULT PERIOD<br />

4.13 It is <strong>for</strong> the landlord to decide whether or not to take termination action in<br />

response to the tenant default. However, it would not be reasonable <strong>for</strong> the threat<br />

<strong>of</strong> a termination claim to hang over a tenant’s head indefinitely. Once the landlord<br />

has knowledge <strong>of</strong> the facts which constitute a tenant default that is actionable<br />

under the statutory scheme, the landlord should have a limited period <strong>of</strong> time to<br />

respond to that default by giving the tenant a tenant default notice. As we have<br />

explained above, 8 waiver will no longer have any part to play in regard to the<br />

scheme. We recognise that waiver may currently provide the tenant with a<br />

defence against <strong>for</strong>feiture where the landlord has acted ambivalently in relation to<br />

the tenant. We consider that the requirement that the landlord give a tenant<br />

default notice to the tenant expeditiously (that is, “use it or lose it”) will be an<br />

important protection <strong>for</strong> the tenant under the scheme.<br />

The CP’s provisional proposals<br />

4.14 We explained in the CP our view that the opportunity to serve a pre-action notice<br />

(now tenant default notice) should not be open-ended. At some stage after<br />

becoming aware <strong>of</strong> a particular tenant default, the landlord should no longer be<br />

able to rely on that default to take termination action. We provisionally proposed<br />

that the notice must be served within six months <strong>of</strong> the landlord obtaining<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the tenant default. 9<br />

4.15 The CP suggested that the default period should run from the day on which the<br />

landlord first knew the facts constituting the tenant default. 10 However, it did not<br />

make any attempt to define what should constitute knowledge <strong>for</strong> these<br />

purposes.<br />

4.16 The CP proposed that where the tenant default is a breach <strong>of</strong> a continuing<br />

obligation, such as a covenant to keep premises in good repair, to insure them or<br />

not to use them <strong>for</strong> a particular purpose, the default period should run from the<br />

date when the breach was last continuing. 11 Such obligations are broken anew<br />

every day on which the want <strong>of</strong> repair, failure to insure or prohibited use<br />

continues, thereby providing a continually recurring ground <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>feiture.<br />

4.17 The CP further proposed that the landlord and tenant should be able to extend<br />

the default period by agreement. This might be appropriate where the landlord<br />

and tenant are negotiating to resolve their differences. The landlord may be<br />

reluctant to take the step <strong>of</strong> serving a tenant default notice while negotiations that<br />

may lead to a settlement continue but would not want to lose the opportunity to<br />

7 Draft Bill, cl 8.<br />

8 Para 3.105 and following.<br />

9 CP, para 12.5(2).<br />

10 CP, para 12.5(2).<br />

11 CP, para 12.5(2).<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!