15.08.2013 Views

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

may be made only with the consent <strong>of</strong> the party who holds the charge. There is<br />

no equivalent to subsection (4)(b) in this case.<br />

Clause 12: <strong>Termination</strong> order<br />

63. Clause 10(2) defines a termination order as an order that the tenancy is to<br />

be terminated. This clause then provides that the termination order must specify<br />

the day on which the tenancy is to come to an end. That day must be no more<br />

than six weeks after the order is made. However, if the court is satisfied that there<br />

would be exceptional hardship were the tenancy terminated within six weeks, it<br />

may postpone termination <strong>for</strong> up to twelve weeks from the date <strong>of</strong> the order.<br />

64. Subsection (4) provides that, where a termination order has effect, the<br />

tenancy comes to an end at the end <strong>of</strong> the day specified in the order <strong>for</strong><br />

termination. However, subsections (5) and (10) allow the tenancy to run on if, <strong>for</strong><br />

example, an appeal against the termination order is pending. Part 52 <strong>of</strong> the Civil<br />

Procedure Rules makes provision about the procedure on appeals.<br />

65. Possession is not an automatic consequence <strong>of</strong> a termination order.<br />

Subsection (6)(a) there<strong>for</strong>e gives the court power to make a possession order in<br />

favour <strong>of</strong> the landlord.<br />

66. Subsection (6)(b) enables the court to require the <strong>for</strong>mer tenant to make a<br />

specified payment to the landlord. This may include a payment in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

occupation or use <strong>of</strong> the premises by the <strong>for</strong>mer tenant until possession is given<br />

up.<br />

67. The current law holds that the <strong>for</strong>feiture <strong>of</strong> a tenancy brings to an end any<br />

interest derived from it, giving rise to the maxim that “the branches fall with the<br />

tree”. 6 Subsection (7) has similar effect in relation to termination orders under the<br />

new scheme. Note the reference to “any interest” (which is not limited to<br />

“qualifying interests” within the meaning <strong>of</strong> clause 30).<br />

68. Subsection (8) contains exceptions to subsection (7) in relation to existing<br />

statutory provisions.<br />

69. Subsection (9) widens the definition <strong>of</strong> “landlord” and “tenant” in order to<br />

take account <strong>of</strong> the fact that, once a termination order is made, the tenancy will<br />

cease to exist and there will, strictly speaking, no longer be a landlord or tenant.<br />

Clause 13: Remedial order<br />

70. Clause 10(3) defines a remedial order as an order requiring the tenant to<br />

take specified action to remedy the tenant default. The order must specify the day<br />

by which the tenant is to complete the action.<br />

71. Subsection (2) allows the landlord to apply to the court during the period in<br />

which the tenant is to take the specified action and seek a termination order on<br />

the basis that the tenant will not complete that action be<strong>for</strong>e the end <strong>of</strong> the period.<br />

6<br />

Great Western Railway v Smith (1876) 2 Ch D 235, 253; Viscount Chelsea v Hutchinson<br />

[1994] 2 EGLR 61.<br />

225

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!