Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
specified in the notice is taken by the date specified and the landlord’s<br />
reasonable costs are paid 39 that would be the end <strong>of</strong> the matter. An Option B<br />
notice would make it clear that, whether or not the tenant takes the specified<br />
remedial action, the landlord intends to make a termination claim on the grounds<br />
set out in the notice.<br />
4.53 An example <strong>of</strong> a pre-action notice was provided at Appendix B to the<br />
Consultation Paper. This was merely an indication <strong>of</strong> how the notice might look<br />
and was not intended to represent the final word as to its <strong>for</strong>m and contents. The<br />
precise <strong>for</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the notice will be a matter <strong>for</strong> secondary legislation.<br />
4.54 Most consultees who responded on this point were in favour <strong>of</strong> the provisional<br />
proposals made in the CP. There was, however, some dissent and we have<br />
taken the opportunity to reconsider this provisional proposal. We have come to<br />
the conclusion that to require the landlord to indicate whether or not he or she<br />
intends to make a termination claim if the tenant default is remedied will add<br />
unnecessary complexity to the notice procedure. We do not there<strong>for</strong>e intend to<br />
proceed with this aspect <strong>of</strong> our provisional proposal.<br />
4.55 Under our recommended scheme, the tenancy continues following the service <strong>of</strong><br />
a tenant default notice (and will continue unless terminated by the court). As long<br />
as the tenancy is extant the tenant should be expected to per<strong>for</strong>m his or her<br />
obligations under it. The landlord, there<strong>for</strong>e, need not demand per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
obligations, including the tenant having to do whatever is necessary to put right<br />
the default; the tenancy continues so the tenant should observe its terms.<br />
4.56 We do not believe that this change will result in any increased danger that<br />
landlords will make a termination claim in circumstances where it is inappropriate<br />
to do so. The conduct <strong>of</strong> the landlord and the tenant must in any event be<br />
considered by the court when making any order under the scheme. We expect<br />
that, as in the current law, 40 the court <strong>for</strong>m on which landlords set out their claim<br />
<strong>for</strong> a termination order will be in prescribed <strong>for</strong>m. We intend that it will be<br />
designed in such a way that landlords will be able to indicate that, although their<br />
claim is <strong>for</strong> a termination order, a remedial order will satisfy their immediate<br />
demands. If a landlord exclusively seeks a termination order but the court<br />
decides that a remedial order (or indeed no order) is more appropriate, the<br />
landlord is liable to be penalised in costs. This should act as a deterrent to a<br />
landlord who might consider using the threat <strong>of</strong> a termination claim to intimidate<br />
his or her tenant whose default does not justify such action.<br />
4.57 We recommend that the tenant default notice:<br />
(1) must be in writing and in the prescribed <strong>for</strong>m; 41<br />
(2) must give particulars <strong>of</strong> the default (or defaults); 42<br />
39 Where the tenancy provides <strong>for</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> the costs <strong>of</strong> the notice.<br />
40 Form N119.<br />
41 Draft Bill, cl 4(2)(a).<br />
42 Draft Bill, cls 4(1)(a) and 6(1).<br />
65