Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
unless he or she obtains a court order under that Act. Although there is an<br />
exception <strong>for</strong> a fixed-term tenancy which gives the landlord “a power to<br />
determine” it, the Act elsewhere provides that references to a power to determine<br />
a tenancy do not include a power <strong>of</strong> re-entry or <strong>for</strong>feiture <strong>for</strong> breach <strong>of</strong> a term or<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> the tenancy. 11<br />
161. Sub-paragraph (1)(d) refers to long residential tenancies continuing as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the security <strong>of</strong> tenure provisions in Schedule 10 to the Local Government<br />
and Housing Act 1989. In particular, paragraph 3 <strong>of</strong> that Schedule provides that<br />
such a tenancy, once continuing under the Schedule, can be terminated only in<br />
accordance with the Schedule. By implication, it cannot be <strong>for</strong>feited.<br />
162. Sub-paragraph (1)(e) refers to introductory tenancies and demoted<br />
tenancies under the Housing Act 1996. Sections 127 and 143D <strong>of</strong> that Act<br />
provide that the landlord cannot bring such tenancies to an end except in<br />
accordance with that Act.<br />
163. Sub-paragraph (2) deals with tenancies which are capable <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>feiture (and<br />
which there<strong>for</strong>e come within the scheme) but in respect <strong>of</strong> which there is already<br />
another mechanism <strong>for</strong> termination in the case <strong>of</strong> a breach <strong>of</strong> covenant.<br />
164. Sub-paragraph (2)(a) refers to section 29(4)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Landlord and <strong>Tenant</strong><br />
Act 1954. This section enables the court to terminate a business tenancy where<br />
the landlord opposes its renewal on certain specified grounds, including the<br />
tenant’s breach <strong>of</strong> covenant.<br />
165. Sub-paragraph (2)(b) refers to section 82(1A) <strong>of</strong> the Housing Act 1985,<br />
which provides <strong>for</strong> possession orders and demotion orders to be made on the<br />
ground <strong>of</strong> a breach <strong>of</strong> a tenant’s covenant. Proceedings <strong>for</strong> those orders already<br />
exist alongside <strong>for</strong>feiture.<br />
166. Sub-paragraph (2)(c) refers to the Agricultural Holdings Act 1986. Case law<br />
suggests that a tenancy under that Act can be <strong>for</strong>feited so long as the landlord<br />
complies with the notice periods under that Act. 12<br />
167. Sub-paragraph (3) preserves the operation <strong>of</strong> Schedule 1 to the Sexual<br />
Offences Act 1956. That Schedule entitles the landlord to determine a tenancy<br />
where the tenant has been convicted <strong>of</strong> using the demised premises as a brothel<br />
and has not acceded to the landlord's request that he or she assign the tenancy.<br />
Such a case may or may not involve a breach <strong>of</strong> covenant. Indeed, use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
premises as a brothel may be authorised by the tenancy. But even where it is not,<br />
the termination will not be on the ground <strong>of</strong> the breach but on the ground <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tenant’s refusal to assign.<br />
168. Paragraph 2 confers power to amend the Schedule by adding, changing or<br />
removing references to enactments or to categories <strong>of</strong> tenancy (and, where<br />
necessary, to make consequential amendments to the statute book). Power to<br />
amend primary legislation would usually be subject to the affirmative procedure in<br />
11 Housing Act 1988, s 45(4).<br />
12 Parry v Million Pigs [1981] 2 EGLR 1.<br />
236