Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(7) Any other matter<br />
5.127 It would be impossible to set out a comprehensive list <strong>of</strong> factors that might be<br />
relevant to any given circumstances. It is there<strong>for</strong>e necessary to empower the<br />
court to take into account any factor that it considers relevant. 91<br />
THE LEASEHOLD PROPERTY (REPAIRS) ACT 1938<br />
5.128 The Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 provides certain tenants with<br />
additional protection from <strong>for</strong>feiture where the breach <strong>of</strong> covenant complained <strong>of</strong><br />
is a covenant to put or keep premises in repair. The operation <strong>of</strong> the 1938 Act<br />
and the mischief it was enacted to deal with have been explained in Part 4. 92<br />
5.129 The CP provisionally proposed that the statutory termination scheme would<br />
incorporate a “repairs regime” modelled on the 1938 Act. 93 This regime would<br />
apply to tenancies with three or more years unexpired and granted <strong>for</strong> a term <strong>of</strong><br />
more than seven years. A tenant <strong>of</strong> such a tenancy served with a tenant default<br />
notice complaining <strong>of</strong> a tenant default that is a breach <strong>of</strong> a repairing covenant<br />
would be able to serve a counter-notice. The counter-notice would require the<br />
landlord to obtain the leave <strong>of</strong> the court be<strong>for</strong>e making a termination claim. The<br />
grounds <strong>for</strong> leave would replicate those in the 1938 Act.<br />
5.130 For the reasons discussed in Part 4, we no longer intend to proceed with the<br />
provisional proposal that the repairs regime should be initiated by a tenant<br />
serving a counter-notice to the landlord’s tenant default notice. This is<br />
unnecessary because, unlike the current law, a tenancy may only be terminated<br />
by an order <strong>of</strong> the court (unless the summary termination procedure is used,<br />
which will not be possible under the repairs regime that we now recommend). 94<br />
5.131 This modification to the CP’s provisional proposal is essentially procedural. We<br />
do not, however, intend to modify the substantive proposal that the protection<br />
af<strong>for</strong>ded to tenants who come within the scope <strong>of</strong> the 1938 Act should be<br />
replicated as far as possible under the statutory termination scheme.<br />
5.132 We recommend that, where a tenancy (other than an agricultural tenancy) 95<br />
was granted <strong>for</strong> at least seven years 96 <strong>of</strong> which at least three years are<br />
unexpired, 97 and there has been tenant default that is a breach <strong>of</strong> a<br />
covenant to put or keep the whole or part <strong>of</strong> the demised premises in<br />
repair, 98 the court may not make any order unless: 99<br />
91 A similar catch-all provision is found in the grounds on which the court may grant a<br />
landlord leave to proceed with <strong>for</strong>feiture under the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938.<br />
92 Para 4.83 and following.<br />
93 CP, para 12.5(8).<br />
94 See Part 7.<br />
95 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 1(2).<br />
96 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 4(1)(c).<br />
97 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 1(1)(d).<br />
98 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 1(1)(b).<br />
99 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 2(1).<br />
102