15.08.2013 Views

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

Termination of Tenancies for Tenant Default - Law Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(7) Any other matter<br />

5.127 It would be impossible to set out a comprehensive list <strong>of</strong> factors that might be<br />

relevant to any given circumstances. It is there<strong>for</strong>e necessary to empower the<br />

court to take into account any factor that it considers relevant. 91<br />

THE LEASEHOLD PROPERTY (REPAIRS) ACT 1938<br />

5.128 The Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938 provides certain tenants with<br />

additional protection from <strong>for</strong>feiture where the breach <strong>of</strong> covenant complained <strong>of</strong><br />

is a covenant to put or keep premises in repair. The operation <strong>of</strong> the 1938 Act<br />

and the mischief it was enacted to deal with have been explained in Part 4. 92<br />

5.129 The CP provisionally proposed that the statutory termination scheme would<br />

incorporate a “repairs regime” modelled on the 1938 Act. 93 This regime would<br />

apply to tenancies with three or more years unexpired and granted <strong>for</strong> a term <strong>of</strong><br />

more than seven years. A tenant <strong>of</strong> such a tenancy served with a tenant default<br />

notice complaining <strong>of</strong> a tenant default that is a breach <strong>of</strong> a repairing covenant<br />

would be able to serve a counter-notice. The counter-notice would require the<br />

landlord to obtain the leave <strong>of</strong> the court be<strong>for</strong>e making a termination claim. The<br />

grounds <strong>for</strong> leave would replicate those in the 1938 Act.<br />

5.130 For the reasons discussed in Part 4, we no longer intend to proceed with the<br />

provisional proposal that the repairs regime should be initiated by a tenant<br />

serving a counter-notice to the landlord’s tenant default notice. This is<br />

unnecessary because, unlike the current law, a tenancy may only be terminated<br />

by an order <strong>of</strong> the court (unless the summary termination procedure is used,<br />

which will not be possible under the repairs regime that we now recommend). 94<br />

5.131 This modification to the CP’s provisional proposal is essentially procedural. We<br />

do not, however, intend to modify the substantive proposal that the protection<br />

af<strong>for</strong>ded to tenants who come within the scope <strong>of</strong> the 1938 Act should be<br />

replicated as far as possible under the statutory termination scheme.<br />

5.132 We recommend that, where a tenancy (other than an agricultural tenancy) 95<br />

was granted <strong>for</strong> at least seven years 96 <strong>of</strong> which at least three years are<br />

unexpired, 97 and there has been tenant default that is a breach <strong>of</strong> a<br />

covenant to put or keep the whole or part <strong>of</strong> the demised premises in<br />

repair, 98 the court may not make any order unless: 99<br />

91 A similar catch-all provision is found in the grounds on which the court may grant a<br />

landlord leave to proceed with <strong>for</strong>feiture under the Leasehold Property (Repairs) Act 1938.<br />

92 Para 4.83 and following.<br />

93 CP, para 12.5(8).<br />

94 See Part 7.<br />

95 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 1(2).<br />

96 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 4(1)(c).<br />

97 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 1(1)(d).<br />

98 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 1(1)(b).<br />

99 Draft Bill, sch 4, para 2(1).<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!