17.08.2013 Views

camp ripley and arden hills minnesota army national guard training ...

camp ripley and arden hills minnesota army national guard training ...

camp ripley and arden hills minnesota army national guard training ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Birds per Plot<br />

4.00<br />

3.50<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

Figure 23. Camp Ripley selected songbird average birds per<br />

plot, 2000-2009.<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

To investigate the reason for the decline in red-eyed vireo numbers the first consideration was<br />

the potential impact of changes in the quantity <strong>and</strong>/or quality of available habitat. Although habitat<br />

alteration may impact small segments of a population, its impact on individual species throughout<br />

Camp Ripley is difficult to determine. For example, timber harvest has the potential to benefit or<br />

negatively impact ovenbirds <strong>and</strong> red-eyed vireos on Camp Ripley. Because they require<br />

unfragmented forest types <strong>and</strong> near complete canopy cover, clearcuts could negatively impact both<br />

species. Thinning or selective tree harvest has the potential to favor ground nesting ovenbirds by<br />

leaving most of the canopy cover <strong>and</strong> opening up the forest floor; this same forestry practice may<br />

negatively impact red-eyed vireos by removing understory nesting sites. Other changes in habitat due<br />

to increased use of prescribed fire in wooded areas, mechanical removal of subcanopy woody plant<br />

species, <strong>and</strong> range development on Camp all have the potential to impact available red-eyed vireo<br />

habitat.<br />

To determine if habitat alterations were responsible for the significant decrease in red-eyed<br />

vireo numbers on Camp Ripley a subsample of permanent songbird plots was selected. First, only<br />

forest habitat songbird plots surveyed in 2009 were selected, <strong>and</strong> then those plots with the highest<br />

total number of red-eyed vireos from 2000-2009. Finally, to try to eliminate other factors that may<br />

have contributed to the decline, only plots in areas that had not been altered or disturbed (timber<br />

harvest, range development etc) in recent years were selected. The purpose of choosing these plots<br />

was to determine if plots with a high density of red-eyed vireos on unaltered plots exhibited this<br />

decline. The results show that even those plots with the greatest number of red-eyed vireos in<br />

undisturbed sites exhibited a similar decline (Figure 24). Other factors that were considered were the<br />

impact of nest parasitism by brown headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater), however the number of<br />

cowbirds per plot has not changed significantly since 2000 (Figure 24). Observer error or changes in<br />

Page 37<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

Red-eyed vireo<br />

(Vireo olivaceus)<br />

Brown-headed cowbird<br />

(Molothrus ater)<br />

Yellow-throated vireo<br />

(Vireo flavifrons)<br />

2009 Conservation Program Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!