20.08.2013 Views

A Respectable Occupation: - University of Hertfordshire Research ...

A Respectable Occupation: - University of Hertfordshire Research ...

A Respectable Occupation: - University of Hertfordshire Research ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

continuation <strong>of</strong> the business. Doubtless some <strong>of</strong> the subjects discussed in<br />

this thesis developed an interest in their father‘s medically related work and<br />

took the apothecaries‘ assistant‘s examination so as to be able to work as a<br />

dispenser. They would then have been in a position to assist in the family<br />

business as a dispenser, thereby avoiding the cost <strong>of</strong> employing a third party<br />

dispenser. A chemist and druggist would have been able to employ a<br />

similarly qualified son or daughter in his business. But in neither case<br />

would these children have been able to succeed their fathers in the practice<br />

or business unless they subsequently qualified respectively as a doctor or a<br />

chemist and druggist.<br />

Among the apothecaries‘ assistants surveyed in this thesis, we have a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> relevant examples. Ellen Howell, Dora Notley, Caroline Horsley,<br />

Amy Coles and Bertha Nix were assistants who could have been employed<br />

in their fathers‘ medical practices, but it is not possible to say whether they<br />

were or not. Ethel Gayton was employed as a dispenser in the North<br />

Western Hospital <strong>of</strong> the Metropolitan Asylums Board where her father was<br />

the medical superintendent. Lilian Kennard and Constance Bradbury were<br />

both daughters <strong>of</strong> medical men, but were working as dispensers away from<br />

home. Mabel Voight, Alice Brookes and Louisa Brookes were the daughters<br />

<strong>of</strong> chemists and druggists. Both Alice and Mabel might have been employed<br />

as dispensers by their fathers, but Louisa Brookes has no recorded<br />

employment in 1901. Ada Taylor and Clara Lloyd could both have been<br />

dispensers in their fathers‘ businesses and both had brothers who were<br />

chemists and druggists and who would have succeeded their fathers. This<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!